Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"

Oncedeceived · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
Dawkins and Crick aren't here. You are. And you have claimed that design exists. You have provided no evidence. Do so. This is not complicated.

IF you don't agree with Dawkins and Crick then fine. Your denial is fine, just don't claim I have the burden.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
IF you don't agree with Dawkins and Crick then fine. Your denial is fine, just don't claim I have the burden.

What, exactly, is it you think he needs to prove?

crjmurray · Jul 7, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
IF you don't agree with Dawkins and Crick then fine. Your denial is fine, just don't claim I have the burden.

You do because you've made a claim. YOU have made a claim. YOOOU.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
You do because you've made a claim. YOU have made a claim. YOOOU.

Either it's a troll job or she really expects us to prove a negative.

crjmurray · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
Either it's a troll job or she really expects us to prove a negative.

Lil of both.

Oncedeceived · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
What, exactly, is it you think he needs to prove?

That design seen in life forms is an illusion as he claims.

Oncedeceived · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
You do because you've made a claim. YOU have made a claim. YOOOU.

Nope.

Oncedeceived · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
Lil of both.

Neither.

crjmurray · Jul 7, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
Nope.

So you've made no claims in this thread?

justlookinla · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
I don't accept design, so it's non sequitur as far as I'm concerned. Now, if you'd like me to consider your claim of design, I'd be happy to consider evidence you may have.

On the other hand, still no evidence for illusion of design.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

justlookinla said:
On the other hand, still no evidence for illusion of design.

Still no evidence of design, either.

bhsmte · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
Dawkins and Crick aren't here. You are. And you have claimed that design exists. You have provided no evidence. Do so. This is not complicated.

Not complicated, but if you can't do it and don't want to be exposed and instead rest your case on appearance (which is subjective) than you ignore this request and keep saying someone else has the burden.

And this is all repeated, with a straight face.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

Oncedeceived said:
That design seen in life forms is an illusion as he claims.

What kind of evidence would you expect?

bhsmte · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
So you've made no claims in this thread?

I can't wait for the answer to this one. Or should I say, non answer.

justlookinla · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
Still no evidence of design, either.

The design elements of complexity, functionality and purpose are present in numerous examples in the human body.

Unless you wish to offer evidence those are just illusions of design.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

justlookinla said:
The design elements of complexity, functionality and purpose are present in numerous examples in the human body.

Unless you wish to offer evidence those are just illusions of design.

What is design, again?

justlookinla · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
What is design, again?

What is evasion, again?

bhsmte · Jul 7, 2015

HitchSlap said:
What is design, again?

Whatever they declare to be design, is design.

HitchSlap · Jul 7, 2015

justlookinla said:
What is evasion, again?

I'd like to answer your question, but you'll need to define design for me.

Oncedeceived · Jul 7, 2015

crjmurray said:
So you've made no claims in this thread?

Nope.

Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"

Senior Veteran

PROUDLY PRIMATE

The Bear. Not The Bull.

PROUDLY PRIMATE

The Bear. Not The Bull.

Senior Veteran

Senior Veteran

Senior Veteran

The Bear. Not The Bull.

Regular Member

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Newbie

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Newbie

Regular Member

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Regular Member

Newbie

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Senior Veteran

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency