Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
The really humorous element in science right now is that areas of study are supplying more and more evidence of design. Science is science and we always want it to follow the evidence.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The really humorous element in science right now is that areas of study are supplying more and more evidence of design. Science is science and we always want it to follow the evidence.Lol, thanks ID for making real science better.
Your motto could be: ID - Making science better one claim at a time!
The really humorous element in science right now is that areas of study are supplying more and more evidence of design. Science is science and we always want it to follow the evidence.
As much as you would like to forget it, the evidence is that life forms and the systems within them are designed for a purpose. This evidence is throughout all of nature and recognizable as design.And yet no one can provide evidence for design. Or a criteria for determining said design. That doesn't sound very scientific.
As much as you would like to forget it, the evidence is that life forms and the systems within them are designed for a purpose. This evidence is throughout all of nature and recognizable as design.
And yet no one can provide evidence for design. Or a criteria for determining said design. That doesn't sound very scientific.
You keep saying that..... but no evidence is presented. Nor have you presented HOW you determined that design exists. So...ya know, do that. And the conversation will move forward.
Rocket science is ID. We automatically assume the appearance of something to be true unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. You can't even do science without making this assumption. The universe we know exists in our own mind.ID is not rocket science, you only need the appearance of something to be true in your own mind. No definition is necessary and no reliable test, it is just there.
It ain't science either.
Rocket science is ID. We automatically assume the appearance of something to be true unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. You can't even do science without making this assumption. The universe we know exists in our own mind.
The design with a purpose is the evidence. Why don't you get that? Evidence is the overwhelming feature of design with a purpose in all living things and the universe too. That evidence has to be explained, even Dawkins understands that. He knows that the evidence must be explained and explained by natural processes and so he creates a story to explain it. You believe it, so much in fact that you have forgotten the reason he needed an explanation in the first place.You keep saying that..... but no evidence is presented. Nor have you presented HOW you determined that design exists. So...ya know, do that. And the conversation will move forward.
Bingo! You can't even do science without working within that assumption.Rocket science is ID. We automatically assume the appearance of something to be true unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. You can't even do science without making this assumption. The universe we know exists in our own mind.
The design with a purpose is the evidence. Why don't you get that?
Evidence is the overwhelming feature of design with a purpose in all living things and the universe too. That evidence has to be explained, even Dawkins understands that. He knows that the evidence must be explained and explained by natural processes and so he creates a story to explain it. You believe it, so much in fact that you have forgotten the reason he needed an explanation in the first place.
The design with a purpose is the evidence. Why don't you get that? Evidence is the overwhelming feature of design with a purpose in all living things and the universe too. That evidence has to be explained, even Dawkins understands that. He knows that the evidence must be explained and explained by natural processes and so he creates a story to explain it. You believe it, so much in fact that you have forgotten the reason he needed an explanation in the first place.
Because it's not true. The ability of a trait to perform a function or serve a purpose does not mean design. It may look designed to you but that does not make it so. Organisms do not look designed to me because I am not aware of any evidence of design. Just the assertion that "this appears designed to me, therefore it was designed". This is why I am asking for actual evidence and a criteria for determining that evidence. I created an entire thread on it.
I don't care what Dawkins has to say. I'm asking for evidence of design.
As much as you would like to forget it, the evidence is that life forms and the systems within them are designed for a purpose.
This system is more complex than any man-made IC systems.
So you deny that there is no appearance of design in molecular systems, the cell, no appearance in life anywhere?Because it's not true. The ability of a trait to perform a function or serve a purpose does not mean design. It may look designed to you but that does not make it so. Organisms do not look designed to me because I am not aware of any evidence of design. Just the assertion that "this appears designed to me, therefore it was designed". This is why I am asking for actual evidence and a criteria for determining that evidence. I created an entire thread on it.
Whoops, missed this. So you don't care what Dawkins says. Fine, who's work do you feel is more influential in your estimation?I don't care what Dawkins has to say. I'm asking for evidence of design.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?