Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't consider myself a Homo sapiens.
Paul warns us not to.
So you are a Homo erectus? Or perhaps a Australopithecus afarensis, that smile looks like one.I don't consider myself a Homo sapiens.
Paul warns us not to.
Kind = genus.
Unbelievers' reality consists only of things "under the sun."Reality care not of your opinion.
I don't consider myself a Homo sapiens.
Paul warns us not to.
Trip me then, and I'll stop using it.Jolly good. So now creationists can start using the same terminology everybody else uses - until somebody trips them up over it, and then they will insist that genus and kind are not synonyms.
Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,Paul knew a lot about twenty first century biology, didn't he? I don't remember seeing him mention σοφος ανθροπος in his writings anywhere. In fact I don't remember him talking about biological species at all.
Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
What does "Homo sapiens" mean in English?
By that standard, are you wise?homo sapientia? It means human wisdom.
By that standard, are you wise?
Unbelievers' reality consists only of things "under the sun."
PZ later speaks about editing and how he further explained Ray's questions, that never made it.Yeah, I missed PZ Meyers. But if Ray Comfort attempted to show up Meyers I would immediately suspect creative "editing".
Again, a man with a track record of misrepresenting/misinterpretting science who focuses on some "observation" gambit as a critique of science is not going to get much time from me. Considering that it is a disingenuous point at best and it is being leveraged to misrepresent science.
Observation is important in science, but that means observation of the DATA. You don't have to see the individual molecules react to characterize the chemical reaction. You don't have to see the crime committed to solve it through forensics.
I strongly agree with the words you used.AV1611VET said:Right
Right
I know what Ray said
I've watched the video several times
Ray
made a serious mistake
telling me the truth about God
Mr. Comfort is an idiot
Watch the video
Embarrassing, isn't it?
Of course,
I might be lousy at
science
QED
PZ later speaks about editing and how he further explained Ray's questions, that never made it.
Nobody really takes Ray seriously, do they?
Appears so.Certainly no one with education in most of these topics. But what is worrisome is that many Creationists and evangelicals love his stuff.
His "take down" of atheists was risible at best. His mischaracterization/misinterpretation of science is scary. It's sad that too many people lack an interest in learning such that they would ever investigate the topics Ray is dishing out for them.
That they are more favoured by Lady Luck than you? Perhaps their prayers are more powerful than yours? There's no skill in the game, it's 100% luck of the roll.I might be lousy at Chutes & Ladders, but what does that say for those I beat?
Would you say that about Backgammon?There's no skill in the game, it's 100% luck of the roll.
Even though the video is not available, enough people have pointed out that its Ray Comfort, resorting to his trick of asking questions to drunk college students on march break.This guy wasted evolutionists and made them go 404.
What ???Even though the video is not available, enough people have pointed out that its Ray Comfort, resorting to his trick of asking questions to drunk college students on march break.
And then editing their reply in post production.
Comfort is nothing if not dishonest
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?