no it is not dishonist if the critisims are valid.
one is not required to post an opinion.
Sent from my tablet using CF
but they could not have, it's impossible as I have posted.
unless random chemistry can create 100% right handed nucleotides?
No offense, Grady, but if there are real scientists who study and do research in this field for a living that state that this Miller Experiment (whatever that was) shows that indeed it is possible, then I tend to believe them over you .... again, no offense.
Who said DNA evolved in a primordial soup? And even if they did, how does that connect to human DNA evolving now?
This is all kind of a moot point. Who said DNA evolved in a primordial soup?
last hero has openly showed disbelief of the primordial soup theory, but maybe you missed that conversation,
here are the posts:
Yeah, what does this have to do with me? I have no idea whether the primordial soup theory is true or not ... and I am certainly no expert in this particular subject; in fact, my limited understanding is that there are few definitives when it comes to the beginning of life question.
all I was doing was showing you where we were at in the conversation that just ended because He denied the soup theory as a possibility, then you stated otherwise, so I reposted my original posts because you said you trust school textbooks over me, (which is fine)
I used you as an example of a lack of belief in the primordial soup theory, I hope you don't mind.[/QUOTE
Can't say I've ever heard of 'primordial soup theory'.
last hero is known for criticising but not coming out open with his own views, which is as best dishonest.
There's nothing dishonest about that. I don't have to tell anyone anything about my life.
Can't say I've ever heard of 'primordial soup theory'.
Actually I didn't say that I trust school textbooks, but, rather, the professional scientists who perform the experiments and have the requisite expertise in the related fields.
But the schools are still teaching water as a possible embryo for life, (primordial soup).
What schools? Out of what textbooks?
do you know of a lot that still support the primordial soup theory?
It's easy to grasp and thats why it's still popular.
I don't know of any in particular .... but, again, this is not my field of study...
so I take it scantily clad women are your thing?
yeah classic art is another story, we have to put up with their nakedness, but no one elses.
What's "to put up with? Its art. The beauty of nature.
Are you admitting that you are the one with the dirty mind, who looks at art "with lust in your heart"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?