Cop out. Got it, you don't have an answer.
Why don't you reply in the thread I just started. I'm guessing you won't because you don't really have an answer. You want to hide behind 623 post.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Cop out. Got it, you don't have an answer.Not up to me to do your research for you.
You don’t want to do your research, am I’m the one coping out? I don’t think so. Now, if you want me to reply, what is the thread and where is it located?Cop out. Got it, you don't have an answer.
Why don't you reply in the thread I just started. I'm guessing you won't because you don't really have an answer. You want to hide behind 623 post.
Did you not read my example of the metaphor with the "top dog"? Can't you see how questions of "why/how/when it happened" makes no sense to ask?How did the fall happen? When did the fall happen? Why did the fall happen?
Do you know why you won't answer the question? YOU CAN'T.
You see, I can. I can read Genesis 3
How about this "the land flowing with milk and honey".. do you think challenging that demands an answer as to when/how/why did it happen"? come on -57, you can't be serious here.Cop out. Got it, you don't have an answer.
Why don't you reply in the thread I just started. I'm guessing you won't because you don't really have an answer. You want to hide behind 623 post.
You are the fools because you are simply pressing on your lack of academical knowledge and making your own claims that the Bible supports you when an amount of evidence and basic reasoning disputes you.I guess it all depends on who the rushing fools are and what they believe.
God says that the wise will be shown to be foolish...
The YEC view, or the "theological Evolution" view..is a simple basic fact that some believe the bible as it is and some believe men know better..
Who are the fools? Would angels tread down that path of spontaneous changes in plants and animals.. for millennia?
I doubt it.
As I said, no bible believer. In case this is news most churches are in apostasy and unbelief. When you cited the various churches, and I clarified I meant bible believers you should have clued in.That is highly false because i've given links from protestant, catholics, and even creation.org.
Totally clueless and off target then. Ok. The Zodiak does not hover over houses.Astronomers paid more attention to the House of the Zodiac in which a star appeared, and other details like the timing and where the moon and sun happened to be.
I meant believers in the bible and God of the bible. Today the word christian is meaningless. That includes believing in Jesus by the way, the Jesus I know created all things. The jesus that christian evos believe in is unknown to me...or the bible!Another false claim on your part. No, you did not say “bible believers.” You said “believers.” Last time I checked Christians are believers.
You don’t want to do your research, am I’m the one coping out? I don’t think so. Now, if you want me to reply, what is the thread and where is it located?
Top dog has nothing to with AdamDid you not read my example of the metaphor with the "top dog"? Can't you see how questions of "why/how/when it happened" makes no sense to ask?
The only reason why you claim "I can't answer" is because you don't know the meaning of the word, therefore you can't determine when an answer is given. Why are you being so obnoxious that you refuse to look up the word "metaphor"?
Unless you provide theologians, apologists and apologetic websites to back up your statement here then you are making stuff up.As I said, no bible believer. In case this is news most churches are in apostasy and unbelief. When you cited the various churches, and I clarified I meant bible believers you should have clued in.
Totally clueless and off target then.
Believe what you like, we already had a sample of what you believe.Unless you provide theologians, apologists and apologetic websites to back up your statement here then you are making stuff up.
Oh? You know what they assumed...how? They sure didn't find the house Jesus was in by assuming anything, they were led there. By the way the house was not in Bethlehem perhaps...You are. You don't understand what the Magi had found. They assumed, from whatever the new star indicated in astrological terms, that meant Bethleham.
You are the fools because you are simply pressing on your lack of academical knowledge and making your own claims that the Bible supports you when an amount of evidence and basic reasoning disputes you.
By understanding that its not a scientific language, but the writers thought differently, like people in their era.How do you read the words of Genesis and NOT take away a six literal day creation. Then, reading further, have it confirmed in later scripture?
Not sure why Eve should not be a real person, but taking her from one side of a man is not something you must believe to be literal. It represents something - closeness to man and primacy of man.So the correction is that we should not believe Eve was real and taken from a man by God, and believe that man descended from simple life forms, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?