Then you've changed the context of the discussion.
No, I'm simply putting it in a differently light, albeit one you're loathe to discuss because it makes your arguments look ridiculous.
I agree.
But I don't think slaughtering the ill is the answer.
I prefer to teach them how to stop paining.
First: I'm not saying that slaughtering the ill is the answer. I'm saying that it's inhumane to deny people the right to die. If I have the right to live, who are you to say I don't have the right to die?
Second: I mean this nicely - not every English word will sustain an "ing" ending. Cancer and pain are not verbs, and can't be used as such. (Nouns don't get "ing" endings.)
Third: You keep claiming it's possible to simply not experience pain. Here you claim you have the ability to teach this. Would I be wrong to guess that you're actually affiliated with the website you linked earlier that touts the ability to teach people exactly what you're talking about?
So, you measure the value of life by money/materialism.
Many of us don't.
I said no such thing, and I'll appreciate it if you refrain from insulting me. I said that I thought it was cruel to saddle someone you love with a huge debt. Maybe you think you're worth ruining the rest of someone else's life. I, on the other hand, do not value my life so highly that I will ruin someone else's simply to gain a few more hours, days, months, or even years.
See, I'm not the one being materialistic. I'm the one saying that my life is not for sale. I'm the one saying that no amount of money is worth exchanging for more or less life. I'm the one saying that I do not value my life over the burdens of others.
It is compassionate to refuse to extend your own life at the expense of others.
You may not value others this highly, but don't try to twist it into some perverted thing.
That would also justify the slaughter of about 90% of the world's population.
I respectfully disagree with your materialistic view.
As I said before, kindly stop being insulting. And no, you're using a strawman argument again - it doesn't "justify the slaughter of about 90% of the world's population".
Please try to use something resembling logic, okay?
Not enough money/profit in it.
So long as it's profitable.
You're not honestly going to try to argue that there's no money in avoiding pain, are you?