. . . Also, you have not looked at the definition of shamad (destroy) as it is used in Psalm 37:38 and Psalm 92:6-7.
You can't hand wave the definition of shamad away like you are attempting to do with the Greek word apollumi.
Here are several verses where shamad does not mean the destruction which you claim occurs at the final judgment.
Genesis 34:30 And Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, Ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites: and I being few in number, they shall gather themselves together against me, and slay me; and I shall be destroyed, [שָׁמַד/shamad] I and my house.
Leviticus 26:30 And I will destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you.
Numbers 33:52 Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places:
Deuteronomy 1:27 And ye murmured in your tents, and said, Because the LORD hated us, he hath brought us forth out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] us.
Deuteronomy 2:12 The Horims also dwelt in Seir beforetime; but the children of Esau succeeded them, when they had destroyed [שָׁמַד/shamad] them from before them, and dwelt in their stead; as Israel did unto the land of his possession, which the LORD gave unto them.
Deuteronomy 2:23 And the Avims which dwelt in Hazerim, even unto Azzah, the Caphtorims, which came forth out of Caphtor, destroyed [שָׁמַד/shamad] them, and dwelt in their stead.)
Joshua 7:12 Therefore the children of Israel could not stand before their enemies, but turned their backs before their enemies, because they were accursed: neither will I be with you any more, except ye destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] the accursed from among you.
Joshua 11:14 And all the spoil of these cities, and the cattle, the children of Israel took for a prey unto themselves; but every man they smote with the edge of the sword, until they had destroyed [שָׁמַד/shamad] them, neither left they any to breathe.
2 Samuel 14:7 And, behold, the whole family is risen against thine handmaid, and they said, Deliver him that smote his brother, that we may kill him, for the life of his brother whom he slew; and we will destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] the heir also: and so they shall quench my coal which is left, and shall not leave to my husband neither name nor remainder upon the earth.
2 Samuel 14:11 Then said she, I pray thee, let the king remember the LORD thy God, that thou wouldest not suffer the revengers of blood to destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] any more, lest they destroy my son. And he said, As the LORD liveth, there shall not one hair of thy son fall to the earth.
2 Samuel 14:16 For the king will hear, to deliver his handmaid out of the hand of the man that would destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] me and my son together out of the inheritance of God.
1 Kings 15:29 And it came to pass, when he reigned, that he smote all the house of Jeroboam; he left not to Jeroboam any that breathed, until he had destroyed [שָׁמַד/shamad] him, according unto the saying of the LORD, which he spake by his servant Ahijah the Shilonite:
1 Kings 16:12 Thus did Zimri destroy [שָׁמַד/shamad] all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the LORD, which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet,
You are committing the fallacy of illegitimate totality transfer. You can't take one subdefinition of a word and insist that the word means that, and only that, in every place it is used. You HAVE to look at the context. Your presupposition of eternal conscious torment in hell is influencing your reading of scripture. Please make some attempt to look at the issue objectively.
Men cannot "destroy" other men and things in
the sense you claim God does the unrepentant at the final judgment. When men shamad e.g. idols and paintings that is different than the shamad you claim God exercises at the final judgment. To argue otherwise that is the lexical fallacy "illegitimate totality transfer."