Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As for the matter of losing salvation, I can quote one verse out of many others that say a Christian cannot lose his salvation. From the Book of John,
10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish,
neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
10:29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is
able to pluck them out of my Fathers hand.
10:30 I and my Father are one.
There are many people who want to argue that Christians can lose their salvation despite scripture such as the one I referenced above. In other words, they teach that one from day to another, Christians can lose their salvation, gain their salvation, and lose it again. They enjoy saying that no man or thing (Romans, Chapter 8) can separate us from the love of God, but we can take outself out of the love of God, i.e. out of the salvation of God. You have to be discerning in these times.
From your perspective, the Bible does not teach infant baptism, but from the perspective of Roman Catholicism and main-line Protestant theology, it does. Indeed, if I were to be placed into a debate on infant baptism in which the arguments could be based solely upon the Bible, I would be swimming upstream against a very strong current if I were to be on the side against infant baptism. Personally, I do not believe in infant baptism, but exclusively in the baptism of believers; and for that reason, I am a Baptist. However, that belief is based upon my personal experience and upon my observations as a Christian much more than it is upon the Bible. This is a Baptist forum, and therefore I shall not present the scriptural case for the baptism of infants, but I will say that anyone who is familiar with the New Testament knows for himself the Biblical foundation for belief in infant baptism, whether they agree with it or not. For those who are not familiar with the New Testament, I suggest that they study it. Furthermore, the basic teachings of Calvinism regarding Romans chapter five must be rejected if one is to come to the conclusion that the Bible does not teach infant baptism.
Numerous passages from the Bible pertinent to the doctrine of eternal security have been discussed in this thread, and it has been shown that not a single one of them teaches the doctrine of eternal security. Furthermore, it has been well documented that the doctrine of eternal security was given birth in the 16th century as a deductive conclusion based upon the false premise that God is absolutely sovereign. Simply saying that the Bible teaches the doctrine of eternal security when it has been shown that it does not does nothing to prove the assertion.
The Saint Joseph Edition of the New American Bible with the second edition of the New Testament (1986) has the following note on Romans 3:21-31,
These verses provide a clear statement of Pauls gospel, i.e., the principle of justification by faith in Christ. God has found a means of rescuing humanity from its desperate plight: Pauls general term for this divine initiative is the righteousness of God (21). Divine mercy declares the guilty innocent and makes them so. God does this not as a result of the law, but apart from it (21), and not because of any merit in human beings but through their forgiveness of their sins (24), in virtue of the redemption wrought in Christ Jesus for all who believe (22.24-25). God has manifested his righteousness in the coming of Jesus Christ, whose saving activity inaugurates a new era in human history.The same Roman Catholic Bible has the following note on Rom. 4:3,
Jas 2, 24 appears to conflict with Pauls statement. However, James combats the error of extremists who used the doctrine of justification through faith as a screen for moral self-determination. Paul discusses the subject of holiness in greater detail than does James and beginning with ch 6 shows how justification through faith introduces one to the gift of a new life in Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit.To state that Arminians teach salvation by works is either to willfully state a falsehood, or to demonstrate ones ignorance of Arminian theology.
There are many people who lack a Bible college or seminary education who want to argue all sorts of non-biblical doctrines and who claim that a Christian can lose his salvation one day and get it back the next, but the Bible teaches that once a man has lost his salvation, it is lost forever. Anyone who believes that God will continue to hold in His hand a Christian who has become an apostate needs to read what is written in Isa. 43 about the people in the hand of God. In v. 13, God says,
13. I am God, and also henceforth I am He;
there is no one who can deliver from my hand;
I work and who can hinder it?
However, Christians who read the rest of the chapter learn the fate of those very same people,
27. Your first ancestor sinned,
and your interpreters transgressed against me.
28. Therefore I profaned the princes of the sanctuary,
I delivered Jacob to utter destruction,
and Israel to reviling. (NRSV)
The very people whom God had held in His hand were given over by God to “utter destruction.”
let me count the TIMES : 0 !!!!!!!!!!I wonder how many times Paul lost his salvation since he never attained perfection.
Neither John Calvin or a Romish Pope died on the cross for man's salvation. It is Christianity we should be teaching and that comes from the Holy Bible, not from tradition or a Pope's thoughts on the scripture.
as I have stated and will state again for your sake, "Utter destruction" can mean alot of things except Hell. death can be a physical death and not a spiritual death, when ever death, or to die or dead is in scripture it is not always a spiritual death , however this utter destruction is referring to the nation/tribe of Jacob and they were allowed to be utterly destroyed as a tribe, this is nothing about salvation, my body can be utterly destroyed but my soul preserved. even in moses time when the golden calf was made God gave israel another chance as a nation/tribe. and Moses said if you want to follow God come over here, and if not stay where you are and the earth opened up and swallow up those they stayed, but again show me in the Bible where these people were cast into hell.
if the utter destruction that jacob received was damnation then please explain this one, Oh Lord how many times will I have to post this one verse?? :
1 Corinthians 5:5
5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
KJV
now seeing your misunderstanding of "UTTER DESTRUCTION" I still will hang onto to that what I have been promised that I will never perish, and That I am sealed until the day of redemption, oh yeah let's not forget that His Mercy endureths FOREVER !!!!!! Thank you Jesus for not leaving my Salvation up to me, PTL!!!!!! HALLELUJAH!!!!!
I wonder how many times Paul lost his salvation since he never attained perfection.
True Christian teaching comes from a true interpretation of the Bible. New and novel interpretations of the Bible are not to be trusted. Indeed, any interpretation of the Bible that was first conceived in the 16the century or later and which expressly contradicts the interpretation of the Bible for 1,500 year is the consequence of interpreting the Bible within the framework of a new and radically different culture.
People who believe in new and novel doctrines like the doctrine of eternal security would do well to study the factors that have caused them to interpret the Bible is a manner that expressly contradicts the interpretation of it by the very early Fathers of the Church who were native Greek speakers and who lived in the same Hellenistic culture as the Apostolic Christians.
Let us never forget that accurately interpreting literature is dependent upon a thorough and accurate understanding of the time, culture, and language in which it was written. Accurately grasping the social, political, and religious views of the author and his intended audience is essential to understanding what the author wished to convey to his readers; and accurately grasping these things is dependent upon a very detailed knowledge of the author’s vocabulary and phraseology. It is for these reasons that our pastor’s spend much of their lives studying the Biblical languages and the cultural and religious background of each of the books in the Bible lest they misunderstand them and inaccurately preach them to their congregations.
Utter destruction means utter destructionit does not mean that the tribes were utterly destroyed but the people making up the tribes were not. The Jews who were securely in the hand of God but became apostate, renounced their faith in the only true God, and worshipped and served deities of wood and stone are not going to spend eternity in heaven with the holy and righteous Godthey are going to spend eternity in hell; and so will Christians who become apostate.
The seal of which you write in your post is the seal of ownershipgiving the owner of the property thus sealed the right to retain, sell, lease, give away, or destroy the property. Gods mercy endures forever, but his mercy on each individual is conditional upon that individual remaining faithful to Him. We see this to be true time and again in the Old Testament, and from the Old Testament we are to learn a lesson regarding Gods mercy to us, and our responsibility to be faithful to God.
Romans 11:16. If the first piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are too.
17. But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree,
18. do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you.
19. You will say then, Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.
20. Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear;
21. for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.
22. Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God's kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. (NASB, 1995)
1 Cor. 10:1. For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud and all passed through the sea;
2. and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
3. and all ate the same spiritual food;
4. and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from a spiritual rock which followed them; and the rock was Christ.
5. Nevertheless, with most of them God was not well-pleased; for they were laid low in the wilderness.
6. Now these things happened as examples for us, so that we would not crave evil things as they also craved.
7. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written, THE PEOPLE SAT DOWN TO EAT AND DRINK, AND STOOD UP TO PLAY.
8. Nor let us act immorally, as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in one day.
9. Nor let us try the Lord, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the serpents.
10. Nor grumble, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the destroyer.
11. Now these things happened to them as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.
12. Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall. (NASB, 1995)
A very nice discussion indeed. I was raised Baptist ever since I came out of my moms womb. I didn't challenge my belief till meeting some wonderful people through the facility I attended college, and then some places I have been contracted to work. Quite frankly I do not know what to believe. I am no bible scholar, nor have I attended a theology school.
Some days I believe that my salvation is safe, and then others not so much. I am a sinner who believes in Jesus Christ, yet I fail every day. I am either scared to pray in front of people I work with, or I am fighting lust sometimes losing, trying to not commit idolatry with common habits, and the list goes on and on.
I always ask for forgiveness, but I still stumble, all while fearing for my soul.
PrincetonGuy from what I have read so far you are more the Armenian than most here, and you seem to be very knowledgeable. You said that if someone loses their salvation, they can never gain it back? How do we identify these people who have lost their salvation? I have a father who went to church as a child, was saved and baptized, but he doesn't go to church anymore, nor is he a spiritual leader of the house. If you were to ask him, he would profess his belief in Jesus, but if you didn't ask him you may not realize it. Has he lost his salvation?
I have meet many Armenians who believe that losing salvation is as simple as taking their eyes of the lord and sinning; I often wonder how someone can have peace while living in human body?
These verses are not saying that each one was baptized by the Holy Spirit unto Christ. They were one with Moses and went through the same trials as mentioned. No where does it say that every Hebrew became a child of God. Witness their actions in the desert. Do their actions look like a child of God. I don't think so.
Are you saying that the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church officials were correct? The writers of the Holy Bible knew what they were writing. It came from the Holy Spirit. The teachings were hijacked and tradition and opinions of the Roman Catholic leaders were taught. The Reformation restored the proper teachings of the Holy Bible that were taught in the beginning of the Church Age.
Utter destruction means utter destructionit does not mean that the tribes were utterly destroyed but the people making up the tribes were not. The Jews who were securely in the hand of God but became apostate, renounced their faith in the only true God, and worshipped and served deities of wood and stone are not going to spend eternity in heaven with the holy and righteous Godthey are going to spend eternity in hell; and so will Christians who become apostate.
The seal of which you write in your post is the seal of ownershipgiving the owner of the property thus sealed the right to retain, sell, lease, give away, or destroy the property. Gods mercy endures forever, but his mercy on each individual is conditional upon that individual remaining faithful to Him. We see this to be true time and again in the Old Testament, and from the Old Testament we are to learn a lesson regarding Gods mercy to us, and our responsibility to be faithful to God.
Romans 11:16. If the first piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are too.
17. But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree,
18. do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you.
19. You will say then, Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.
20. Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear;
21. for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.
22. Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God's kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. (NASB, 1995)
1 Cor. 10:1. For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud and all passed through the sea;
2. and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
3. and all ate the same spiritual food;
4. and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from a spiritual rock which followed them; and the rock was Christ.
5. Nevertheless, with most of them God was not well-pleased; for they were laid low in the wilderness.
6. Now these things happened as examples for us, so that we would not crave evil things as they also craved.
7. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written, THE PEOPLE SAT DOWN TO EAT AND DRINK, AND STOOD UP TO PLAY.
8. Nor let us act immorally, as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in one day.
9. Nor let us try the Lord, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the serpents.
10. Nor grumble, as some of them did, and were destroyed by the destroyer.
11. Now these things happened to them as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.
12. Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall. (NASB, 1995)
A very nice discussion indeed. I was raised Baptist ever since I came out of my moms womb. I didn't challenge my belief till meeting some wonderful people through the facility I attended college, and then some places I have been contracted to work. Quite frankly I do not know what to believe. I am no bible scholar, nor have I attended a theology school.
Some days I believe that my salvation is safe, and then others not so much. I am a sinner who believes in Jesus Christ, yet I fail every day. I am either scared to pray in front of people I work with, or I am fighting lust sometimes losing, trying to not commit idolatry with common habits, and the list goes on and on.
I always ask for forgiveness, but I still stumble, all while fearing for my soul.
PrincetonGuy from what I have read so far you are more the Armenian than most here, and you seem to be very knowledgeable. You said that if someone loses their salvation, they can never gain it back? How do we identify these people who have lost their salvation? I have a father who went to church as a child, was saved and baptized, but he doesn't go to church anymore, nor is he a spiritual leader of the house. If you were to ask him, he would profess his belief in Jesus, but if you didn't ask him you may not realize it. Has he lost his salvation?
I have meet many Armenians who believe that losing salvation is as simple as taking their eyes of the lord and sinning; I often wonder how someone can have peace while living in human body?
Have you compiled a list of quotes (with references) from the early church fathers who believed that salvation was conditional on continuing to believe?The teachings that distinguish Roman Catholic theology from Protestant theology were not conceived until well after the Council of Nicaea in the fourth century. We do not have any writings from this early period in which any passages in the Bible were interpreted to teach eternal security, but we do have many writings from this early period in which passages in the Bible were interpreted to teach conditional security. During the time between the Council of Nicaea and the 16th century, we have very numerous writings in which conditional security is taught, but we do not have any at all in which eternal security is so much as mentioned. If anyone of prominence had taught it, even if that persons writings had eventually become lost, we would expect to find a number of theologians arguing against that viewbut we do not. We do not find any extracanonical evidence of any kind that anyone interpreted any passage in the Bible to teach eternal security until the 16th century. Therefore, to say that the Reformation restored the proper teaching of the Holy Bible is incorrectwhat it did do is introduce to the Church five new and novel doctrines, all of which were given birth as a consequence of conclusions drawn through deductive reasoning based upon the faulty premise that God is absolutely sovereign. That premise is refuted by literally thousands of passages in the Bible, and until some Roman Catholic dissidents became outraged with the then current practices and teachings in the Roman Catholic and overreacted to them, that premise had not yet been conceived. Hence, the five new and novel doctrines that resulted from that premise had not yet been conceived.
Our earliest Baptist forefathers were Arminian in their theology until some Baptists heard these brand new doctrines that had been recently conceived by some men in Europe, and the doctrines very soon became so popular that they found their place in early Baptist confessions of faith. Since that time, the very large majority of Baptists have gradually come to reject as non-biblical one or more of these five doctrines that are know today as the Five Points of Calvinism. Personally, I reject all five of them for biblical reasons, and look forward to the day when all Baptists will reject all five of them for biblical reasons, and return to the teaching of the Ante-Nicene Church Fathers and the our earliest Baptist forefathers.
i think i may have lost my salvation reading this thread.