Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm familiar with this game.(staff edit)
He did better than I.3. He fell asleep at Ephesus.
Wow. Awesome testimony, thanks!I agree with your theory. Personal testimony shows that Annihilationism is often used as a halfway house on the road to recovery:
Here's an extract from the testimony of a young worship leader. The full testimony is here: The Holocaust Called Hell
Thanks. That's worth discussing. Tell us more.God's own will is that all are saved. Damnation is a concept originally invented by fallen angels (such as lucifer), so that evil exists.
Someone in this video presentation below said that with the increasing interest in Annihilationism, eventually the discussion would be between Annihilationism and Ultimate Redemption. (something to that effect) From which came our "gateway" and "halfway house" comments. (I think)
Agree.I think it's inevitable. The idea of God as Torturer is not sustainable in the long term...
Unfortunately, I am no expert in this. Yet, maybe we need to ask ourselves why we become concerned about negative subjects such as hell. My humble answer is that we are tempted by evil angels. Christ Himself did not escape such temptations. One could quote Bible passages such as:Thanks. That's worth discussing. Tell us more.
Interesting that the concept of "hell" is of equal importance in both Christianity and Satanism.
Even within the church I see the threat of hell used as spiritual extortion to control well-meaning believers.Hell is their weapon against honest and simple people/Christians who see God as an All-Good, uncomplicated Power, Full of Humility and Positivity.
Are you saying that the 2nd resurrection occurred with the 2nd coming of Christ in 70 AD in Jerusalem, or was it worldwide?But there was another, 2nd resurrection to come, which Paul had to explain at some length in the "rapture" text of 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. That particular 2nd resurrection event had not yet happened when Paul wrote 2 Timothy 2:14-18, and was the one Paul was anticipating in those verses.
More Augustine nonsense!I think it's inevitable. The idea of God as Torturer is not sustainable in the long term, even though it's lasted 1,500 years or so since Augustine popularised it. I don't think many people actually believe in ECT anyway but just think they're supposed to otherwise they'll be called a heretic, and they've not heard of universalism other than, again. that it's a heresy. It's the advent of the Internet that's changing things. It seems that the Internet is doing a better job at the moment in educating people about Christianity and its history than the church is.
More Augustine nonsense!
My ¢¢, Below are quotes from three Jewish sources; the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, 1972 Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud. Which to date have not been, and I am convinced cannot be, disputed.
The correct Biblical term is not "eternal conscious torment" it is "eternal punishment." If you have a problem with that talk to Jesus, He said it.Even within the church I see the threat of hell used as spiritual extortion to control well-meaning believers.
Especially in a situation where the believers are taught that salvation is through the church.
Therefore, excommunication means eternal conscious torment in the afterlife with no hope of escape.
What terrifying power they wield against their followers.
Don't like it? Trying proving your claims.More indisputable early 1900's and seventies encyclopedic nonsense with an interesting and varied typographical emphasis that somehow contrives to make it even worse!
Rome has not gone away; Rome canonized the Christian Bible; for the next 200 years Rome used a Paganised version of Christianity to motivate it's troops fighting mostly among itself; 490 AD the Roman Church confiscated the remains of Rome and continued as a union of Church and State until Napoleon put the Pope in prison and separated the Church and State; the English language uses Roman script, the clock face on Big Ben uses Roman Numerals; the signs of Rome are everywhere; Rome has not gone away, it squirms around a lot, changes form.I don't sit in any one camp, Sparow. Those "little bits from all over the place" are the fragments of truth that each of the camps has recognized. All I am attempting to do is to combine all these bits of truth from the various camps into one homogenous whole that will agree with scripture 100%. Everyone posting on this forum has at least something that I can be in unity about.
The reason why I can claim that Daniel's entire image was already destroyed and turned to dust back in AD 70 is that the five components that made up that image have disappeared: everything from the head of gold which composed Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian kingdom, down to the "clay" of the people of Israel blended with the "iron" of the Roman empire. All the elements composing this image were crushed to dust TOGETHER in one blow by Christ the "rock" back in AD 70, because this final, blended mixture of Israel and Rome ended during the AD 66-70 era.
Isaiah once labeled the people of Israel as "CLAY" in Isaiah 64:8. "But now, O Lord, thou art our father; WE ARE THE CLAY, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand." This "CLAY" of the people of Israel was never supposed to align with the pagan religions and start collaborating with the pagan kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, or the Roman empire. But by the time the Roman Republic had developed into the (iron) Roman empire, Israel had turned into an "iron / clay" mixture with Rome that never really bonded together very well. It was an unstable unity that broke apart during the Jewish rebellion against Rome starting in AD 66.
But the vision of this broken image reduced to powder represents more than the governmental structure of these five kingdoms that was turned into dust in the AD 66-70 era. Behind those ancient pagan kingdoms, the Satanic realm had operated behind the scenes, trying its best to frustrate God's plans for the redemption of the nations. (Daniel recognized a couple of these wicked angels and called them "the Prince of Persia, and the "Prince of Greece" who were fighting against the angelic messenger who was giving visions to Daniel.)
God had plans to destroy those wicked "Princes" over the nations, as well as Satan himself. This destruction of the entire Satanic realm took place by the close of AD 70. God had once promised the "anointed cherub", Satan, that he would be burned up to ashes upon the earth, so that he would exist no more (Ezekiel 28:18-19). And that was fulfilled in the first century, as promised to the Roman believers in Romans 16:20. "And the God of peace shall crush Satan under your feet SHORTLY..."
Evil has had more than once source, ever since the Fall in Eden. The evil that resides in the hearts of mankind before conversion is presently capable of creating mayhem and disaster for their fellow man, even without the presence of any demonic or Satanic assistance . You are correct that Paul once said that Satan was "the God of this world" who once held power over the kingdoms of this world, as Satan once boasted to Christ during the wilderness temptation.
But what was true at the time Paul wrote that statement is no longer true. Christ confiscated all the "many crowns" of those "kingdoms of the world" when He destroyed Satan to ashes in AD 70, and He is presently wearing all those "many crowns". He is ruling, even "in the midst of His enemies", because "the kingdom of God is within" us believers. We carry the kingdom power of the Holy Spirit within us everywhere we go among the unbelievers of this world. The kingdom of God is a mobile thing - not related to a physical temple on earth any longer.
You aren't connecting this statement about "THE resurrection" with Paul's other writing about two different resurrection events in 1 Corinthians 15:20-23, one of which Paul said had already happened. The error of Hymenaus and Philetus was in teaching that there was supposed to be ONE and ONLY ONE resurrection, and that the "First resurrection" of "Christ the First-fruits" and the Matthew 27:52-53 saints raised that same day was the only bodily resurrection event that the saints could ever expect to take place. Others like Hymenaus and Philetus (and the Sadducees) were teaching that there was NO resurrection of the dead to be expected in the future for the first-century believers.
In one sense, Hymenaus and Philetus were right that a resurrection was past already. That AD 33 "First resurrection" of Christ and the resurrected 144,000 "First-fruits" Matthew 27:52-53 saints was indeed "PAST ALREADY". But there was another, 2nd resurrection to come, which Paul had to explain at some length in the "rapture" text of 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. That particular 2nd resurrection event had not yet happened when Paul wrote 2 Timothy 2:14-18, and was the one Paul was anticipating in those verses.
I believe it is permissible to post this answer in this Controversial Christian Theology section. The answer is that the 2nd resurrection event was not only worldwide in its effects, but it also took place from Jerusalem. The glorified, resurrected Son of Man bodily descended upon the Mount of Olives opposite Jerusalem's eastern gate with a literal earthquake on AD 70's Pentecost day, at evening time (Zechariah 14:4-7). A deep layer of landslide rubble broken loose from the Mount of Olives' crest is still lying in the Kidron Valley today as a result of that earthquake.Are you saying that the 2nd resurrection occurred with the 2nd coming of Christ in 70 AD in Jerusalem, or was it worldwide?
All of that information is immaterial when it comes to the PAST destruction of Daniel's entire image composed of those five elements, which image was crushed into dust during the AD 66-70 Great Tribulation period. Daniel's image made of various metals and clay concluded on the timeline with the combination of Israel as the CLAY blended with the IRON of the Roman empire in the image's feet and toes. This particular blended union has not existed since the AD 66 rebellion against Rome was launched. What you are wanting to do is to elongate just the feet and toes section of that symbolic image to be multiple times as long as the other upper parts of the image. This makes for an unnatural, unrealistic portrayal of a human figure.Rome has not gone away; Rome canonized the Christian Bible; for the next 200 years Rome used a Paganised version of Christianity to motivate it's troops fighting mostly among itself; 490 AD the Roman Church confiscated the remains of Rome and continued as a union of Church and State until Napoleon put the Pope in prison and separated the Church and State; the English language uses Roman script, the clock face on Big Ben uses Roman Numerals; the signs of Rome are everywhere; Rome has not gone away, it squirms around a lot, changes form.
Not true.the symbolism of Daniel's image, which was intended to be compared with the normal dimensions of a human figure.
Even if you don't acknowledge a certain set amount of time periods for each of those kingdoms to operate, there is no denying that the blended union of the "clay" as the nation of Israel with the "iron" of the Roman empire did not last beyond the AD 66-70 Zealot rebellion. It can't get any more definite than Isaiah 64:8 proclaiming about his own people the Israelites that "WE are the CLAY..."Not true.
You say yourself that image was a symbol; it was not designed to give time periods for those Empires.
OK.From that Mount of Olives location, the holy angels with the returning Christ gathered ONLY the resurrected righteous "from the four winds of heaven" around the globe, who returned with Him to heaven. . . . All these gathered, resurrected righteous ones of that 2nd resurrection event on AD 70's Pentecost day converged in that one Jerusalem location and were taken to heaven from there, to "meet the Lord together in the air".
Where did their souls go?Hades was then emptied of the souls of the wicked dead doomed to destruction,
I believe this has been the case since the Lord's resurrection.All righteous souls at their physical death are now immediately "present with the Lord".
The souls of the wicked who had died up to that point were destroyed in that AD 70 judgment. We are told that we are to fear him who is able to destroy both body AND soul in hell (Matthew 10:28).Where did their souls go?
Yes, agreed. Ever since AD 33 and Christ's resurrection and ascension, the souls of the righteous were then able to enter heaven and be "present with the Lord". I believe that particular resurrection day in AD 33 was the point which Revelation 14:13 referred to when it said: "...Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord FROM HENCEFORTH..." There is a notable transition change in this "HENCEFORTH" term. A special blessing was ushered in that had not existed before then.I believe this has been the case since the Lord's resurrection.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?