"Embedded Age" Requires Fake Fossils

[AV1611VET]

If it isn't obvious now, I answered a post that answered my post with a pointless statement about what evolutionists believe. Who cares what they believe? I answered it truthfully, that "evolutionists believe it is true". Then somebody started telling me to prove it LOL! It's like a circus here

What is being done to you is what I do when someone mentions "Yahweh."

I usually chime in with, "Who is Yahweh," since I believe "Yahweh" is a name coined by Lucifer.

Sometimes it sparks a dance party -- sometimes not.

 

[AV1611VET]

Or just acknowledge you pulled your statement out of left field.

Then I've been 'pulling it out of left field' for over nine years now.

 

[bhsmte]

Then I've been 'pulling it out of left field' for over nine years now.

You said it.

 

[AV1611VET]

They have always been two separate theories.

Okay, thanks.

 

[AV1611VET]

You said it.

Yup -- I sure did.

I started over nine years ago.

 

[Loudmouth]

Either way -- they are considered two different doctrines.

They are considered to be two theories, not doctrines.

 

[AV1611VET]

They are considered to be two theories, not doctrines.

Biblically, they are referred to as "sought-out inventions," "philosophies," and "endless genealogies."

 

[Loudmouth]

Biblically, they are referred to as "sought-out inventions," "philosophies," and "endless genealogies."

The Bible is really good at twisting words and meanings. Makes you wonder who wrote it.

 

[AV1611VET]

The Bible is really good at twisting words and meanings. Makes you wonder who wrote it.

Nope -- the Devil makes YOU wonder who wrote it.[VERSE=Genesis 3:1,KJV]Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?[/VERSE]

 

[dad]

I didn't say it did. What does any of this have to do with what I DID post??
This is my post;

"I'm unable to handle a conversation very long with Christians who claim God age-embedded fossils to fit their unscriptural theology.
Probably about as long as I can handle an evolutionist pushing his religion of spontaneous life erupting and morphing on it's own...
I'd rather preach Christ "

Then, all the sudden, somebody started telling me to prove evolution... "forehead slap"

years ago they disassociate devolution with the first lifeforms hey claim, because it ishogwash, and can't be proved. Now they mock people who state the obvious about what evolution is really about,if they don't make that distinction. They are basically trying get to make you sound dumbfounded including that first life as part of evolution fyi.

 

[Loudmouth]

Nope -- makes YOU wonder who wrote it.

Who is said to twist words?

And I have a feeling that, even if unbelievers didn't think It twisted words and meanings, they would still wonder who wrote it.

Unbelievers agree with believers. Men wrote it.

 

[crjmurray]

years ago they disassociate devolution with the first lifeforms hey claim, because it ishogwash, and can't be proved. Now they mock people who state the obvious about what evolution is really about,if they don't make that distinction. They are basically trying get to make you sound dumbfounded including that first life as part of evolution fyi.

You alright?

 

[HitchSlap]

You said it.

It's my opinion he's pulling it from somewhere else.

 

[Nic Samojluk]

Who is the universe in charge of?

The universe is in charge of someone older than the universe. And BTW, the universe is older than the date of the Big Bang. The evidence is in!

Ref.: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html

“Previous research had estimated that the Milky Way galaxy's so-called "Methuselah star" is up to 16 billion years old. That's a problem, since most researchers agree that the Big Bang that created the universe occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. …”

Ref. http://www.space.com/20112-oldest-known-star-universe.html

 

[Nic Samojluk]

Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life.

From soup to cells — the origin of life

“Evolution encompasses a wide range of phenomena: from the emergence of major lineages, to mass extinctions, to the evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospitals today. However, within the field of evolutionary biology, the origin of life is of special interest because it addresses the fundamental question of where we (and all living things) came from. …”

Ref.: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/side_0_0/origsoflife_01

If tomorrow experts were to succeed in creating life from non-living matter, would you still argue that the origin of life is not an integral part of the theory of evolution?

 

[HitchSlap]

From your linky:

"Put all of those ingredients together and you get an age of 14.5 billion years, with a residual uncertainty that makes the star's age compatible with the age of the universe," said Bond. "This is the best star in the sky to do precision age calculations by virtue of its closeness and brightness."

The universe is in charge of someone older than the universe. And BTW, the universe is older than the date of the Big Bang. The evidence is in!

Ref.: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html

“Previous research had estimated that the Milky Way galaxy's so-called "Methuselah star" is up to 16 billion years old. That's a problem, since most researchers agree that the Big Bang that created the universe occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. …”

Ref. http://www.space.com/20112-oldest-known-star-universe.html

 

[Nic Samojluk]

Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life.

Miller/Urey Experiment

“By the 1950s, scientists were in hot pursuit of the origin of life. Around the world, the scientific community was examining what kind of environment would be needed to allow life to begin. In 1953, Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey, working at the University of Chicago, conducted an experiment which would change the approach of scientific investigation into the origin of life. …”

Ref.: http://people.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/Exobiology/miller.html

 

[Nic Samojluk]

So then, God's priority places your Oldsmobile ahead of children suffering and starving? Is this the god you worship?

I have concluded that your alleged concern for the children and the unborn is merely a sham. If you were truly interested in them, you would not criticize a man who has devoted a couple of decades on behalf of the pro-life "ad honorem"—without any compensation.

 

[Nic Samojluk]

You don't do well with disagreement, do you?

I have no problem with disagreements, but not so well with unfair repeated put downs.

 

[HitchSlap]

I have concluded that your alleged concern for the children and the unborn is merely a sham. If you were truly interested in them, you would not criticize a man who has devoted a couple of decades on behalf of the pro-life "ad honorem"—without any compensation.

SR makes a salient point, and you choose to ignore it? In no way did he criticize or disparage your charitable work. He simply made the point that your car repair takes precedence over children who suffer and starve on a daily basis.
Shame on you for claiming mea culpa.