Why did YOU reply to MY post, "Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life."
What did you expressing that have to do with my post?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Embedded Age" Requires Fake Fossils
- Thread starter Loudmouth
- Start date
- Status
Why did YOU reply to MY post, "Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life."
What did you expressing that have to do with my post?
Are YOU following this thread? I never made that claim. You need to keep track of who you are talking to.
Upvote
0
And that distance verify's time.
Yup! Just like gravity. Just a theory. I'm not going to go through it because I know you have been explained the difference between general layman's theory and a scientific theory a gizillion times. If you wish to play ignorant to what a scientific theory is and describes, that's your problem.
An understanding of basic spectroscopy would go a long way in helping you understand that you struck out with a straight pitch and curve ball. Simply put, specific light waves of the electromagnetic spectrum are absorbed at specific wave-lengths, which identifies the specific isotope, molecule, or compound. In the case of the SN1987A, it was the gamma-ray portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that was being observed. What was measured were individual isotopes and their concentration with respect to time and distance which reveals their lifetime (decay rate). I utilized the same process as a professional chemist for over 25 years. The only difference being that the part of the electromagnetic spectrum I utilized in measurements was between the infrared and ultraviolet wavelengths, rather than the gamma-ray portion, what I was measuring. The chemistry and physics are the same.
Upvote
0
I didn't say it did. What does any of this have to do with what I DID post??
This is my post;
"I'm unable to handle a conversation very long with Christians who claim God age-embedded fossils to fit their unscriptural theology.
Probably about as long as I can handle an evolutionist pushing his religion of spontaneous life erupting and morphing on it's own...
I'd rather preach Christ
"Then, all the sudden, somebody started telling me to prove evolution... "forehead slap"
Upvote
0
Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
Do you feel I am being unkind to you? Perhaps I should spell out my points for you.
1. It makes little sense for God to be more concerned about a car that won't run, than the millions of much more needy of his people on this planet that could better use his help.
2. It is, in any case, must more likely that the car started that one time without God's help, regardless of the diagnosis of the auto mechanic. That is, assuming that he meant it was virtually impossible to get the car to turn over, rather than very unlikely to get it to turn over in its condition at the time.
I hope that clarifies my position on your story. I certainly do not mean to be unkind, but rather realistic.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,587
- 52,504
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Winepress, your remark was ... to me ... an innocent one.
But, as I learned when I first joined this site, evolutionists have detached abiogenesis from evolution and made them two separate doctrines.
They now consider the idea that {abiogenesis can't explain evolution} a PRATT.
Thus the old adage: "Evolution can explain survival of the fittest, but it can't explain arrival of the fittest" has been effectively neutralized.
Upvote
0
bhsmte
Newbie
I didn't say it did. What does any of this have to do with what I DID post??
This is my post;
"I'm unable to handle a conversation very long with Christians who claim God age-embedded fossils to fit their unscriptural theology.
Probably about as long as I can handle an evolutionist pushing his religion of spontaneous life erupting and morphing on it's own...
I'd rather preach Christ
Then, all the sudden, somebody started telling me to prove evolution... "forehead slap"
Read again, your post #1314 and maybe that will clear things up for you.
Then, if you could, explain and support what you meant by the statement you made in post #1314.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,587
- 52,504
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
If it isn't obvious now, I answered a post that answered my post with a pointless statement about what evolutionists believe. Who cares what they believe? I answered it truthfully, that "evolutionists believe it is true". Then somebody started telling me to prove it LOL! It's like a circus here
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,587
- 52,504
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
bhsmte
Newbie
Oh, it is quite obvious what is going on.
You made a claim, you say it is truthful that "evolutionists believe it is true" and yet, you have no desire to support your claim?
Asking you to support your claim makes it a circus? I would think, people randomly making wild claims without supporting them, would be more like a circus?
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
