• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Does The Sun Really Exist?

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟96,195.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Presumably like everybody else they feel the effects from the environment - where else could the heat be coming from? And presumably they can distinguish between different types of heat.
Presumably.

The effect of heat tells me there is a cause, but it doesn’t tell me what the cause is. And since I’m blind, how can I ever know what the cause is?
I could be wrong - but while I know blind people may wonder what "colour" and "light" are like, I have yet to hear of cases where a blind person didn't know what the sun itself was.
I would say they know what heat is since that is their only experience. The cause of the heat to them would be unknown.
Incidently OP's question reminded me of something I read in a book: the psychologist Richard Gregory was describing the first time his patient, known as S.B. (a blind man who had his eyesight restored as an adult), saw a quarter moon. He was quite surprised - he said he had expected it to be wedge-shaped rather than a crescent.

Which, when you think about it, makes sense. After all, what does the quarter of a round cake look like?
So while he was blind his perception of the moon was wrong all along.

His perception of the sun could have been wrong too. :)
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟96,195.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sure, objects (like cameras, radars, etc) can "see" the sun, but alas, we can not with the naked eye.
No kidding...


2388408-man-looking-at-sunset-in-the-hotel.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Tomk80

Titleless
Apr 27, 2004
11,570
429
46
Maastricht
Visit site
✟44,082.00
Faith
Agnostic
Presumably.

The effect of heat tells me there is a cause, but it doesn’t tell me what the cause is. And since I’m blind, how can I ever know what the cause is?
By setting up experiments that tease out what the cause is. For example, the first thing would be to determine when you feel the warmth and when you don't. This would give you a fix on the direction of the source of the warmth. You could use instruments to further determine this direction, the same way we determine other sources of electromagnetic radiation like x-rays.

Basically, you start with the most basic observations and go from there, building on the previous observations and refining them.

I would say they know what heat is since that is their only experience. The cause of the heat to them would be unknown.
Of course it's not unknown to them. Because they can make use of the knowledge acquired by other persons.

So while he was blind his perception of the moon was wrong all along.
Certain aspects of his perception were wrong.

His perception of the sun could have been wrong too. :)

Again, parts of it, yes.
 
Upvote 0

QueSi

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2013
1,511
41
Mississippi
✟2,027.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Wiccan_Child said:
I know, but QueSi claimed that you can't see something by any light it emits by itself, you can only see something by the light it reflects. Yet, clearly, we can see those objects by their emission spectra alone.

Being a particle physicist, that's not quite right. When atoms absorb light as heat, they oscillate more in all degrees of freedom; though this includes spinning, the energy actually goes more into vibration than anything else.

As well, the reason they begin to glow is actually due to their stronger and more frequent collisions with their neighbours, giving their electrons energy. These electrons drop back down, releasing that energy as a photon. The hotter the object, the bigger the drop, the more energetic the photon. That's why things begin to glow when hotter, from red to yellow to white, giving way to blue.

If the sun stopped putting off light, could it be seen with the naked eye?
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,474
806
73
Chicago
✟140,871.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Not at all. The OP states that the person is blind, and asks how we would convince such a person that the Sun exists. It never for one second ruled out giving them back their sight. The full text of the OP is:

"If I was born blind, how would you prove to me or convince me that the sun exist?"

The easiest way to prove to a blind person that the Sun exists, is to make them no longer a blind person. Where, in the OP, is the solution to the hypothetical forbidden to be a cure to the aforementioned blindness?

That is what I said, you violated the premise of the question. That is illegal. You are not answering the question.
 
Upvote 0

QueSi

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2013
1,511
41
Mississippi
✟2,027.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
juvenissun said:
That is what I said, you violated the premise of the question. That is illegal. You are not answering the question.

Making a blind person see proves to them that the sun exists, how does that answer violate the premise of the question? What laws or rules were established that they broke?
 
Upvote 0

freezerman2000

Living and dying in 3/4 time
Feb 24, 2011
9,525
1,221
South Carolina
✟54,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Making a blind person see proves to them that the sun exists, how does that answer violate the premise of the question? What laws or rules were established that they broke?

It makes to much sense...therefore invalidating their stance on the subject.:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0