LivingWordUnity
Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
I've heard about at least one Pope in history that allegedly held to a heresy before he was elected, but the story goes that he renounced the heresy at the time he became the Pope. And there have been antipopes in history (someone who claimed to be the Pope when he wasn't validly elected). If a Pope was validly elected in the first place then that doesn't change. And although a validly elected Pope is protected by the Holy Spirit from teaching heresy, this protection from error only applies when he is teaching formally and definitively from the chair of Peter on a matter of Christian faith and/or morals. And I think that limit implies that at other times it could be possible for him to either teach error or privately believe in it. But if a Pope holds a heretical belief while going through the process of getting elected, and he lies about his beliefs in order to get elected it seems like that would invalidate his election like how a marriage can be annulled based on deception going into it. If a man is elected this way only God would know that he secretly held a heretical belief unless he had let someone else in on his secret.Out of curiosity say if a cardinal is elected pope who try as he might he just can not believe jesus was the son of god.. would that pope still be valid?
Last edited:
Upvote
0