MoonLancer
The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Ah creationists at their finest. If anyone was wondering whats the harm, we need look no further.
Upvote
0
Not true.
Prior to Darwin, Creationists knew the Earth was a sphere.
"The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV, 800 B.C.
After Darwin, Evolutionists started to think the Earth was flat:
Citation needed.
I already proved how every Hindu and Greek on Earth in the 4th century B.C. knew the Earth was a sphere.
"The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV, 800 B.C.
Nonsense.
I already demonstrated this to be false.
So why are you trying to rewrite the Vishnu Purana?You can't rewrite history.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It isn't peer-reviewed and it is edited by 14 year olds.I even told you where to find the source of my quote (I can't directly link due to lack of forum privileges). Go on wikipedia, go to the page titled 'flat earth'. It's not hard. Eesh.
evolutionists? the flat earth society is a bunch of creationists.Not true.
Prior to Darwin, Creationists knew the Earth was a sphere.
"The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV, 800 B.C.
After Darwin, Evolutionists started to think the Earth was flat: The Flat Earth Society
lol no you didn't, you proved that there are people and texts that show different views of the world.Citation needed.
I already proved how every Hindu and Greek on Earth in the 4th century B.C. knew the Earth was a sphere.
try first century ad."The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV, 800 B.C.
lol no you didn't, you just deny stuff you don't like. the very fact that you think that providing a bunch of quotes constitutes an argument proves one thing.Nonsense.
I already demonstrated this to be false.
FYI: repeating a blatantly wrong quote doesn't change that it is wrong.So why are you trying to rewrite the Vishnu Purana?
"The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV
FYI in order to get a PhD in history it is necessary to rewrite history.
you would be 100% wrong about wikipedia, enyclopedia britannica said it is just, if not more reliable than EB is. you really think people don't check the sources for wiki? that they don't make a huge effort to be correct?Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It isn't peer-reviewed and it is edited by 14 year olds.
"The orb of the Earth is seen...." -- Vishnu Purana, Book I, Chapter IV
Read it and weep.
LOL.evolutionists? the flat earth society is a bunch of creationists.
You have no proof.if anything i've seen AoS you never change your views no matter how much proof is presented to you that you are wrong.
Blatant flame.you love to wallow in your carefully created ignorance.
Why have you declared war on history?lol no you didn't, you proved that there are people and texts that show different views of the world.
you cherry-picked various quotes that prove nothing other than you don't have a clue what the hindus and greeks thought.
You have no evidence.that would be found in greek mythology and hindu mythology, not random philosophers and texts that weren't written till the 1st century ad, which makes sense, given they imported greek texts.
Try Vedic Period.try first century ad.
The original version must have written during the later Vedic period (800bce
You mean like everyone else? Welcome to planet Earth.lol no you didn't, you just deny stuff you don't like.
You have no evidence and no logical argument.the very fact that you think that providing a bunch of quotes constitutes an argument proves one thing.
namely that you have no argument.
LOL.FYI: repeating a blatantly wrong quote doesn't change that it is wrong.
i weep only at the shallowness of your arguments and claims. as i said repeating yourself doesn't make your argument any stronger.
LOL.
Citation needed.
Anyway that still doesn't prove that ancient creationists thought the Earth was flat when in fact they did not.
from: About the Flat Earth SocietyThe modern age of the Flat Earth Society dates back to the early 1800s, when it was founded by Samuel Birley Rowbotham, an English inventor. Samuel Rowbotham's Flat Earth views were based largely on literal interpretation of Bible passages.
evidence of what? greek mythology says the earth was an egg you just said i was wrong, you provided no evidence i was wrong, you just gain-sayed me.You have no proof.
You have presented no evidence.
that isn't a flame its an observation, you gainsay anything that you don't believe.Blatant flame.
why are you so disingenuous?Why have you declared war on history?
hard to refute someone with no evidence to begin with, all you have are a bunch of random quotes and extrapolation.You have no evidence.
if you are going to make such shallow anti-intellectual snipes, how about quoting the whole thing?Try Vedic Period.
According to your infallible Holy Scriptures: Vishnu Purana - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
do we have the original? no we have one from later and its not even agreed on.H. H. Wilson considers the Vishnu Purana to be one of the oldest of the Puranas, and dates it to the first century BCE,[2] though Gavin Flood dates it later to the fourth century CE.[3]. The original version must have written during the later Vedic period (800bce-300bce); but in its present form, it may have been edited or recomposed during the Gupta era (300CE-500CE).
nope, just in your mind.You mean like everyone else? Welcome to planet Earth.
what evidence do i need? i posted links to greek and roman,celtic, norse mythology, and they all say they believed in a flat earth.You have no evidence and no logical argument.
oh yes i know.As somebody pointed out to me yesterday, Agonaces is most likely a very dedicated Poe. Go on Google and type in "bad astronomy agonaces". Click on the first link called "I have arrived as a skeptic". Read and enjoy.
Enjoy what a moron Phil Plait is: http://www.christianforums.com/t7495506/As somebody pointed out to me yesterday, Agonaces is most likely a very dedicated Poe. Go on Google and type in "bad astronomy agonaces". Click on the first link called "I have arrived as a skeptic". Read and enjoy.
nope, where is your logic now huh? huh? i DISAGREE WITH YOU, WHAT NAO?LOL.
So the orb of the Earth isn't seen?
Sorry, I didn't realize you are a Flat-Earther.
Looks like I have nothing more to add.
drivel from someone who needs to go take a few astronomy classes.Enjoy what a moron Phil Plait is: http://www.christianforums.com/t7495506/
I haven't declared war on history.then you didn't bother to LEARN about them did you lol.
Any would be a good start. You have none.what evidence do i need?
So why do you use Wikipedia, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein for proof?using philosophers for proof AoS, is a fallacy, its a fallacy of composition.
go look it up.
The last place I'd go to actually learn about astronomy is an astronomy class.drivel from someone who needs to go take a few astronomy classes.
who has? your statement about the flat-earth society is WRONG, just accept that they are creationists.I haven't declared war on history.
i've given you evidence before, you just plain reject it.Any would be a good start. You have none.
your claim is that the greeks and the hindus knew the earth was round what is your evidence? philosophers, and a late term religious text that wasn't even part of mainstream belief, and you then say that that is evidence for your claim.So why do you use Wikipedia, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein for proof?
wow virtually nothing you wrote is relevant to what i said.The last place I'd go to actually learn about astronomy is an astronomy class.
"... the chief object of education is to unlearn things." -- G.K. Chesterton, philosopher, All Things Considered, 'An Essay on Two Cities', 1908
"Unlike the current belief in the field that observations can be discarded according to whether they fit a theory, I submit that the observations in fact are the known laws of physics." -- Halton C. Arp, astronomer, 1987
"If you want to find evidence refuting Big Bang Theory, just point a telescope at the sky!" -- Tom Van Flandern, astronomer, 1993
"Observations in science are the primary and ultimate authority." -- Halton C. Arp, astronomer, 1998
A predictable fundy response from someone with faith in Scientism.wow virtually nothing you wrote is relevant to what i said.
who knew someone could post such a ream of irrelevant drivel, and still thinks that constitutes an argument.
edit: then again whats to expect from a person who swallows anything written by the fringe? solely because they ARE fringe at that?