Does Science Agree With the Bible?

[dad]

They didn't have any research dealing with pregnant mothers prior to the approval of the drug in European markets.

But with research came the ability to easily kill millions of the babies in the mothers.

 

[dad]

I mean the evidence that humans share a common ancestor ..

Only your religion suggests that, due to a now purposeful misreading of evidences.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Hey, when the King returns, people can kiss so called science goodbye forever. Won't see Pauli no more.

They work hard to collect all the natural evidence. Ecc 22 26 "For to a person who is good in His sight He has given wisdom and knowledge and joy, while to the sinner He has given the task of gathering and collecting so that he may give to one who is good in God's sight. This too is vanity and striving after wind".

 

[dad]

Do you still think the Bible is your God?

Pr 30:5 - Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.

Mt 4:4 - But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

By the way, kids, Jesus quoted the last verse to Satan himself Personally. His message and Saran's are clear.

 

[dad]

They work hard to collect all the natural evidence. Ecc 22 26 "For to a person who is good in His sight He has given wisdom and knowledge and joy, while to the sinner He has given the task of gathering and collecting so that he may give to one who is good in God's sight. This too is vanity and striving after wind".

They collect it and then sully, and stain, and corrupt it with their belief system. They know not truth.

 

[joshua 1 9]

They collect it and then sully, and stain, and corrupt it with their belief system. They know not truth.

They try to explain the evidence, but they do not know God so they do not have His wisdom, knowledge and understanding.

 

[Loudmouth]

Pr 30:5 - Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.

Is Solomon your God?

 

[dad]

They didn't have any research dealing with pregnant mothers prior to the approval of the drug in European markets.

Herod sent in soldiers to kill the babies. Pharaoh tossed them to the crocs. There have been something like (depending of the stats we look at) a billion and a half babies mercilessly burned butchered hacked to pieces, or otherwise murdered since say, 1970, no?

That Satanic wonton destruction of the innocents took research aplenty.

 

[Loudmouth]

They try to explain the evidence, but they do not know God so they do not have His wisdom, knowledge and understanding.

So when you say something that is completely wrong about nature, what does that say about your knowledge?

 

[dad]

They try to explain the evidence, but they do not know God so they do not have His wisdom, knowledge and understanding.

They desperately try to explain evidence only in the dark light of their belief set, religiously, fanatically, godlessly, wickedly.

 

[dad]

Is Solomon your God?

You believe in Solomon?? How about Noah? Tell us what we can believe in Scripture or not now will ya?

Did God fill the temple with smoke and His presence and light the sacrifices, and give more wisdom to Solomon than other men ever had up to that time?

 

[Loudmouth]

Herod sent in soldiers to kill the babies. Pharaoh tossed them to the crocs. There have been something like (depending of the stats we look at) a billion and a half babies mercilessly burned butchered hacked to pieces, or otherwise murdered since say, 1970, no?

That Satanic wonton destruction of the innocents took research aplenty.

What in the world are you talking about?

 

[Loudmouth]

They desperately try to explain evidence only in the dark light of their belief set, religiously, fanatically, godlessly, wickedly.

When the evidence is against you, all you seem to be able to do is call people names. Go figure.

 

[Michael]

Those who know Him know He really really really created it all. Others who a limited understanding of God and His word have either chosen to disbelieve it, or have never really looked into it.

Gah, you're still debating *if* rather than *when*! Oy Vey.

 

[The Cadet]

Hey, when the King returns

There's a terrible Elvis joke in here somewhere. Can anyone help me fish it out? Anyone?

 

[durangodawood]

There's a terrible Elvis joke in here somewhere. Can anyone help me fish it out? Anyone?

Today is Elvis' birthday!

 

[Loudmouth]

There's a terrible Elvis joke in here somewhere. Can anyone help me fish it out? Anyone?

Pink Cadillac in the sky? Elvis and the Four Horseman? Put the Grace back in Graceland?

 

[loveofourlord]

There are plenty of fossils of sea creatures well above sea level. Plenty of fossils where animals were violently and quickly buried. Lots of

There are plenty of fossils of sea creatures well above sea level. Plenty of fossils where animals were violently and quickly buried.

The account of the flood also suggests massive reconstruction of the earth's surface. Forming mountains, and changing the topography considerably.

Like I said earlier, we can argue over how evidence supports the flood (or doesn't), but neither of us were there. So, we both have to take our beliefs on faith.

yeah FOSSILS, you know, not seashells, but stone impressions of seashells and such, when we find shells laying ontop of mountains as they would if they were 4500 or so years old then lets talk.

 

[bhsmte]

The walls came down from an Earthquake. There is a sermon written by John Wesley that shows God is the cause of Earthquakes. But really what I had in mind was the work by Planck and Einstein and others. They base their science on God. So we need to look at some of their quotes and some of what they wrote in their books. The science you support and believe in would not exist if it were not for Christians. As Planck said: It is not by accident that the greatest thinkers were and are Christians. This maybe a good place to start: http://nobelist.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/50-nobelists.pdf

Was that sermon done scientifically?

 

[Astrophile]

It is true that fundamentalists can be as hopeless as atheists when it comes to crass literalness, but they are both pretty hopeless. I can certainly recognise figures of speech which are still in use today, such as ends of the Earth.

If we could go back in time and ask the people who wrote the Bible 2000 and more years ago what shape the Earth is and whether it is stationary or in motion, do you think that they would reply that it is nearly spherical and that it is in orbit around the Sun?