- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,718
- 52,527
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
And I've spent the last few posts showing you where you're wrong.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've spent the last few posts showing your standards are illogical and contradictory ...
No the universe is not inside a black hole for the simple reason space-time outside beyond a black hole's event horizon is static not expanding where as the universe is.If you estimate the total mass of the Universe and calculate its Schwarzchild Radius, you'll realize this Radius is well within the known boundary of the Universe.
What that means is the Universe we know, or at least, most of it, including ourselves exist inside an extremely large black hole roughly the size of our Universe.
If you want to know what's inside a black hole, look no further and pinch yourself, that's you! But as silly scientists go, they can't predict what goes inside the black hole, it is the region of space where physics don't make sense...... At the scale of the Universe, we begin to deal with the "macroscopic" version of quantum mechanics. Our universe could even be somebody else's atom.
.....Why many things in our Universe, don't make sense....that's because it's inside a really huge black hole! OR we are just really really tiny and we don't even know it!
Good question. We can touch, smell, see, experience and do stuff with the reality we live in. Not so much with Dark Energy.
Saying God did it is not a satisfactory answer as you haven't shown how God did it while your standards remain logically inconsistent as you haven't provided any counterarguments to suggest they are.And I've spent the last few posts showing you where you're wrong.
Saying God did it is not a satisfactory answer as you haven't shown how God did it while your standards remain logically inconsistent as you haven't provided any counterarguments to suggest they are.
You must suffer from selective blindness or a lack of basic comprehension skills.Suit yourself.
I'm not going over all this again.
I corrected a big mistake you made (see Post 127), and I don't feel like going over all this again.
We know neutrinos exist with abundance in the 5% of the Universe. Their mass is known and even spin. Knowing the kind of stuff that I read in Wiki, most of which I have no idea what they are talking about, it's clear that neutrinos are well studied and defined. So I can't say that neutrinos are invisible to us. Far from it.What about neutrinos? Are they "real"? You can't do anything with them. You can't experience them, touch them, or see them.
We know neutrinos exist with abundance in the 5% of the Universe. Their mass is known and even spin. Knowing the kind of stuff that I read in Wiki, most of which I have no idea what they are talking about, it's clear that neutrinos are well studied and defined. So I can't say that neutrinos are invisible to us. Far from it.
It's my understanding that dark matter and dark energy is still hypothetical, at least in their makeup. And that it's their negative gravity force that tells us they fill 95% of the Universe. I claim no authority on this at all. It's just amazing to me that our physical world makes up such a small percentage of the Universe.It really felt like you were talking about using ones "senses". Before they were detected, neutrinos were "identified" by their missing nature impacting other things (like neutron decay). Dark matter and dark energy are detected by the same sort of indirect methods.
No the universe is not inside a black hole for the simple reason space-time outside beyond a black hole's event horizon is static not expanding where as the universe is.
The universe's singularity more resembles a white hole which is a time reversed black hole where nothing can enter the event horizon but emits signals from the inside to outside the horizon.
I think you missed the point.Was the once upon a time our reality that we are living in?
What about today? What's going on now where there are electrons.
I think you missed the point.
The fact that dark energy and dark matter is not understood by us does not mean those things are real. It is just the same as the fact that there was once a time when we did not understand electrons, or even know about them. Yet electrons were still part of reality at that point.
Here are the problems with your model.Most of the matter falling into a black hole is ejected away. And our "location" inside our 'black hole universe' is possibly near one of the "ejection" points (South or North Pole).
Space-time curvature is utterly convoluted at these regions that everywhere we look, we see the "ejection zone". So we think the Universe is expanding but what we're seeing are simply all kinds matter being ejected out and away from our black hole home.
Since our 'black hole home' is a really really big one, things don't get "spaghettified" when they reach its Event Horizon, they just fall in fully intact and then fall out unscratched. It doesn't have an accretion disc either simply due to its incredible size....My point is, everything will look "normal". We won't see evidence of this giant black hole because it doesn't possess many of the features of a "normally" sized black hole.
AKA Will Ferrell.
I've not said that they are not real. Can you point towards how we in our everyday lives interact with dark energy and dark matter? I sure can't.I think you missed the point.
The fact that dark energy and dark matter is not understood by us does not mean those things are real. It is just the same as the fact that there was once a time when we did not understand electrons, or even know about them. Yet electrons were still part of reality at that point.
I've not said that they are not real. Can you point towards how we in our everyday lives interact with dark energy and dark matter? I sure can't.
Here are the problems with your model.
When an object or observer reaches a black hole’s event horizon and passes through it is curtains and can never reemerge.
This can be explained with a Minkowski space-time diagram.
The observer’s present time and location is where the observer’s past and future light cones meet.
The region inside the past light cone is where events have occurred in the observer’s past and events which will happen in the observer’s future fall inside the future light cone.
As the observer approaches the event horizon the light cones narrow due to gravitational time dilation and when it passes inside the event horizon at r = rₛ the time like and distance like terms in the Schwarzschild metric are interchanged.
Geometrically the light cones “tip over” and the singularity is in the observer’s future light cone and the event horizon is in the observer’s past light cone.
To travel back towards the event horizon requires the observer to travel back into his past which needless to say is impossible.
This eliminates the idea of the universe existing inside the event horizon of a giant black hole as your matter is ejected outwards to the event horizon and therefore into the past.
The other issues with your model is when we observe matter ejected from supermassive black holes in the form of quasars and galaxies with active galactic nuclei (AGN) an accretion disk is necessary.
As the material from the accretion disk approaches the event horizon it is heated up to millions of degrees K due to friction and the conversion of gravitational potential energy into heat.
Matter is ionized along with the creation of X-ray and gamma ray photons.
Ionized matter can have sufficient kinetic energy to never reach the event horizon and is ejected as jets the dimensions of which depend on the thickness of the accretion disk.
Since the ejected matter travels through space time it is subject to the laws of special relativity where it cannot exceed the speed of light.
Yet galaxies with redshifts exceeding z = 1.46 have recession velocities exceeding the speed of light and therefore are not ejected through space-time.
Instead galaxies are being carried along by space-time expansion known as the Hubble flow where the speed of light is not an upper limit.
All of those things are detectable, are they not?This discriminant (not in our everyday lives) also applies to neutrinos, gamma rays, mesons, muons, and cosmic rays, yet all of these things are real.
I'm sitting here wondering how a person would detect dark matter and dark energy in the realm of "ordinary matter" as @sjastro described in post 86?You could also say similar things for the strong nuclear force. Sure it interacts with the components of the nuclei in the atoms of your molecules (holding them together), but you don't notice it and you'd need an nuclear physics experiment to detect even the effects.
If anyone hasn’t been paying attention to the point of outright ignoring it would be you.You did not pay very careful attention to some of the things I wrote but that's alright.
A black hole the size of the Universe is going to pretty big obviously. So big the lines of gravity at the Event Horizon (EH) is going be virtually parallel even with "lines" that are many light years apart.
What that means is despite the incredible gravity at the EH, the ones acting to compress matter would be so little, it won't even factor in. Tidal forces are also going to be incredibly little, no 'spaghettification' of matter will ever occur.
With almost negligible compression and tidal forces. there won't be an accretion disc present in universe-sized black holes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?