What would you tell someone who asked you what they needed to do to be saved?
Explain to me how, according to your beliefs, everyone can be without excuse for not glorifying God as God and being thankful to Him (implying the ability to do so) while, at the same time, some are not able to confess their sins and put their faith in Christ as their Lord and Savior?
Perhaps a legal example would help:
Suppose an invalid borrowed money from you on the promise that he would repay you from his father's inheritance at his father's death.
The invalid has contracted a just debt, which he is responsible to pay.
But suppose when the invalid comes into the inheritance, a con artist cons him out of the whole inheritance before his debt is paid, and the con artist is no where to be found. The invalid is still responsible for his just debt, although he is unable to pay.
The principle here is that
responsibility to pay is not based in ability to pay, but in what is justly owed.
The same is true spiritually. Responsibility to obey God is not based on man's ability to pay God, but on what man justly owes God.
God is the center of the universe, not man (
Isa 45:9, Jer 18:6). He has a right to obedience from man (
Lk 17:10) and, therefore, obedience is justly owed to him. Man's
impotency does not release him from that just debt, because man's responsibility does not issue from his
ability to pay, but from what he justly
owes God.
How does it makes sense that someone is able to choose whether or not to glorify God and be thankful to Him, but can't choose whether or not to confess their sins and put their faith in Christ?
They can't choose either one, but that
impotency does not remove the obligation of their just debt to do so.