Can you tell me where it says Enoch died? From what I read.. "He was no more cause God took him"The bible says Enoch died not seeing
the promises. The bible says no regular
man has been into heaven.
What does the book of enoch say?
Upvote
0
Can you tell me where it says Enoch died? From what I read.. "He was no more cause God took him"The bible says Enoch died not seeing
the promises. The bible says no regular
man has been into heaven.
What does the book of enoch say?
That argument can be made.. However, looks pretty certain that He is talking about a certain scripture, not a concept... to me anyway.Right.
He could be teaching a concept, that when putting many verses and teachings from the OT together, one could see and understand that humans will be like angels in the resurrection.
he doesn’t necessarily have to be quoting a specific verse.
I don't think that anyone is saying that Enoch was His source.I voted no.
Jesus was before the world began. Enoch was not HIS source.
As a side note I think Paul's teaching on the resurrected body is cohesive with "like the angels of God"
How many times is this been proven to be true?
his audience were the Sadducees who accepted only the Pentateuch as scripture. He may have been quoting something everyone was familiar with and broadly accepted but if he quoted outside of the Pentateuch and presented it as scripture it would have been rejected by the Sadducees and called out, instead it says he silenced them.I don't think that anyone is saying that Enoch was His source.
I think they are saying that Christ is quoting something that HE considers scripture that is known to His audience... and telling them what it says.. Quite possible words that Enoch wrote and those listening to Christ were well aware and familiar with it.
Can you tell me where it says Enoch died? From what I read.. "He was no more cause God took him"
If Enoch did not die - if he were changed to immortality - and thus continued to walk with God, then his days would have been more than three hundred and sixty-five years.
I don't get the sense He was quoting anything just answering the ignorance of those trying to trap Him.I don't think that anyone is saying that Enoch was His source.
I think they are saying that Christ is quoting something that HE considers scripture that is known to His audience... and telling them what it says.. Quite possible words that Enoch wrote and those listening to Christ were well aware and familiar with it.
Jesus Himself said: "No man hath ascended
up to heaven,but he that came down from
heaven, even the Son of man" (John 3:13)
So, Enoch still didn't die. God took him. Just like Elijah didn't die but was taken.That Enoch was not found because God took him,
or "translated" him. The primary meaning is to
"convey to another place ... transfer". It does
not say he went to heaven at that time.
Jacob died his body was "carried over"
This same Greek word is rendered
"carried over" in Acts 7:16.
After Jacob died his body was "carried over"
- transported, translated - to Sychem where
he was buried!
Moses died and was buried by God.
God removed Moses - God translated
him - and he was not found either.
"all the days of Enoch were three hundred
sixty and five years"
If Enoch did not die - if he were changed to immortality - and thus continued to walk with God, then his days would have been more than three hundred and sixty-five years.
-
Enoch is included by Paul in ( Hebrews 11:1-12)
among the fathers who obtained a good report
through faith; but"these all , having obtained
a good report through faith, received not the
promise" (Heb. 11:39).
"These all [including Enoch] died in faith."
-
Enoch lived only three hundred and sixty-five.
Clearly Enoch died a premature death
I believe Lamech, a descendant of Cain:
"I have slain a man to my wounding, and
a young man to my hurt..... (Gen. 4:23-24).
The "man"was Cain, the "young man"was
Enoch, [who died young compared to others.
Enoch walked with God. Furthermore, he
prophesied of the coming of Christ to execute
judgment and to convict the ungodly (Jude 14-15). a "preacher of righteousness"( II Peter 2:5).
I believe Lamech (by himself or with a mob)
stilled Enoch's voice by murder. God allowed
Enoch to be martyred. But He would not permit
his body to be desecrated or publicly displayed.
God took him physically away from the people, just as He later took Moses. And God buried each so well that neither has ever been found since!
-
The "hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot
lie, promised before the world began" (Titus 1:2).
Paul's saying that Enoch "should not see death"
It is not in the past tense, that he "did not see"
death - but that he "should not see death."
The death which Enoch should escape must be the second death which will never touch those who are in the first resurrection (Rev. 20:6).
Enoch and all the worthies of old will receive the
promise of eternal life at the return of Christ,
the same time Christians obtain it (Heb. 11:40)
-
Colossians 1:13: the Father "hath delivered
us from the power of darkness, and [ hath
translated us] into the kingdom of his dear Son."
He was removed (translated) from the ways of the world and lived three hundred years according to God's ways so that he might inherit eternal
life at Christ's return, and should not suffer the second death.
What then of Elijah?
So, Enoch still didn't die. God took him. Just like Elijah didn't die but was taken.
Enoch is included by Paul in ( Hebrews 11:1-12)
among the fathers who obtained a good report
through faith; but"these all , having obtained
a good report through faith, received not the
promise" (Heb. 11:39).
"These all [including Enoch] died in faith."
-
Enoch lived only three hundred and sixty-five.
Clearly Enoch died a premature death
How do you square that with verse 5 of this passage?
By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. - Heb 11:5 NKJV
Paul's saying that Enoch "should not see death"
It is not in the past tense, that he "did not see"
death - but that he "should not see death."
He Was Translated [or moved and buried by God]μετετέθη Was Translated G3346 V-API-3S τοῦ G3588 T-GSM μὴ Not G3361 PRT-N ἰδεῖν To See G1492 V-2AAN θάνατον Death,
The verb is in the Aorist tense - point-action, usually in the past. True of TR, Nestle, SBL text forms. I see nothing subjunctive about it.
I don't see this as a satisfactory resolution of "he did not see death". But to each his own.He Was Translated [or moved and buried by God]
The second death will not touch him.
Would that not conflict with Jesus HimselfI don't see this as a satisfactory resolution of "he did not see death". But to each his own.
We have to consider the context of Scripture when evaluating these verses. The writer of Hebrews had just explicitly stated that Enoch did not experience death. When he then says "all these died..", it is reasonable to conclude that he is referring to the others he had just listed, with Enoch being an exception.Would that not conflict with Jesus Himself
said: "No man hath ascended up to heaven,
but he that came down from heaven, even
the Son of man" (John 3:13)
Enoch is included by Paul in ( Hebrews 11:1-12)
"These all [including Enoch] died in faith."
Psalms 89:48 (KJV)
What man is he that liveth, and shall not see death? shall he deliver his soul from the hand of the grave? Selah.
Well, firstly, Jude doesn't use the word 'scripture.' He doesn't even use 'written.' He just says this was prophesied by Enoch. If there was some oral tradition of a prophecy attributed to Enoch (or even one detailed in a now-lost written work), then it would hardly be implausible for a book that attributes itself to him to make use of it, meaning both it and Jude were relying on a mutual source.Except there was a written source at the time. Can you name any other 'scripture' at the time which was actually just some oral tradition?
You might consider that there isWe have to consider the context of Scripture when evaluating these verses.
Well, firstly, Jude doesn't use the word 'scripture.' He doesn't even use 'written.' He just says this was prophesied by Enoch. If there was some oral tradition of a prophecy attributed to Enoch (or even one detailed in a now-lost written work), then it would hardly be implausible for a book that attributes itself to him to make use of it, meaning both it and Jude were relying on a mutual source.
Granted, it's absolutely possible that Jude is in fact quoting the "Book of Enoch," but this is lending endorsement only to that portion, not the full thing. But to answer your question of 'some oral tradition,' this is exactly the explanation many give for Matthew 2:23.