If yes, why would he create some human just to let them parish in Hell. Let's try and focus mostly on the doctrine of Election.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They limit God in their denying Him to be One that rewards.There is a difference between knowing and choosing. We make our own choices. God in His fore-knowledge knows what decision we will make. That is NOT Him choosing.
The problem with both Calvinism and Arminianism in this question is they both limit God to being subject to our flow of time, and to our understanding of logic.
My answer would be similar... God knows who will choose Him because He exists outside of time and knows the end from the beginning. He actually DRAWS a man unto Himself (John 6:44) but we still have to choose (Deuteronomy 30:19). I disagree (respectfully) with @Daniel9v9 as I think we can comprehend this one for the reason I just shared. All of the things that mark time, the rotation of the earth (a day) the orbit of the moon (a month) and orbit of the earth around the sun (a year) and all the division we can make between them (hours, minutes, seconds) are all things God created... but He existed BEFORE that. He is outside of time and therefore knows who will and will not choose Him. We are, from THAT perspective, predestined but not in the sense of some being create to live and some to be tortured for eternity for nothing within their power... but simply because He foreknows as He exists beyond time.There is a difference between knowing and choosing. We make our own choices. God in His fore-knowledge knows what decision we will make. That is NOT Him choosing.
The problem with both Calvinism and Arminianism in this question is they both limit God to being subject to our flow of time, and to our understanding of logic.
My answer would be similar... God knows who will choose Him because He exists outside of time and knows the end from the beginning. He actually DRAWS a man unto Himself (John 6:44) but we still have to choose (Deuteronomy 30:19). I disagree (respectfully) with @Daniel9v9 as I think we can comprehend this one for the reason I just shared. All of the things that mark time, the rotation of the earth (a day) the orbit of the moon (a month) and orbit of the earth around the sun (a year) and all the division we can make between them (hours, minutes, seconds) are all things God created... but He existed BEFORE that. He is outside of time and therefore knows who will and will not choose Him. We are, from THAT perspective, predestined but not in the sense of some being create to live and some to be tortured for eternity for nothing within their power... but simply because He foreknows as He exists beyond time.
The message from Yeshua was repent (Matthew 4:17) and from Peter (Acts 2:38) which means we have to turn away from sin and turn to God and His ways... for the remission of sins. If you desire to believe that we play no part in this, go ahead. But, while God alone does the saving, God expects action from us. And seeing we are not saved yet (we still decay and die, get disease, are exposed to sin and other unrighteousness, war, famine, etc.) then we do apparently have some role to play.Many in our day hold to the idea of "choosing God", but I think this is a very dangerous belief - it's even something that has been rejected as a heresy by the early church, but somehow it's crept back in.
Perhaps seemingly harmless, but here are some implications of "choosing God":
1. We are dead in sin and unable to work or approach any spiritual thing by our own nature or strength. Like a dead thing we can't choose or work. Certainly not to resurrect ourselves.
2. God reveals Himself to us, and as you say, draws us to Him. We can only know about God through His deliberate self-revelation.
3. Only God alone works salvation and saves us. We don't save ourselves. Salvation is entirely a gift from God.
If we could choose, or even say "yes" to God, that means that Jesus works 99% of the salvation and we do 1% by saying "yes" to salvation. This then leads to the 1% being the ultimate deciding factor that outweighs Christ's works and merits - this is far from what Scripture teaches. This is entering Semipalagian realms, the heresy mentioned.
Put short, we don't first love God, but God first loved us. 1 John 4:19
The sum of this problem is called Crux Theologorum - the 'cross of the theologian' - why God saves some and not others (or why He saves anyone)
This lays it out well:
http://www.stpaulslutheranchurch.net/cruxtheologorum.html
We make our own choices.
Except for the fact that:And in our own choices, apart from the grace of God, no one will choose God.
Many in our day hold to the idea of "choosing God", but I think this is a very dangerous belief - it's even something that has been rejected as a heresy by the early church, but somehow it's crept back in.
Perhaps seemingly harmless, but here are some implications of "choosing God":
1. We are dead in sin and unable to work or approach any spiritual thing by our own nature or strength. Like a dead thing we can't choose or work. Certainly not to resurrect ourselves.
2. God reveals Himself to us, and as you say, draws us to Him. We can only know about God through His deliberate self-revelation.
3. Only God alone works salvation and saves us. We don't save ourselves. Salvation is entirely a gift from God.
If we could choose, or even say "yes" to God, that means that Jesus works 99% of the salvation and we do 1% by saying "yes" to salvation. This then leads to the 1% being the ultimate deciding factor that outweighs Christ's works and merits - this is far from what Scripture teaches. This is entering Semipalagian realms, the heresy mentioned.
Put short, we don't first love God, but God first loved us. 1 John 4:19
The sum of this problem is called Crux Theologorum - the 'cross of the theologian' - why God saves some and not others (or why He saves anyone)
This lays it out well:
http://www.stpaulslutheranchurch.net/cruxtheologorum.html
If yes, why would he create some human just to let them parish in Hell. Let's try and focus mostly on the doctrine of Election.
My answer would be similar... God knows who will choose Him because He exists outside of time and knows the end from the beginning. He actually DRAWS a man unto Himself (John 6:44) but we still have to choose (Deuteronomy 30:19). I disagree (respectfully) with @Daniel9v9 as I think we can comprehend this one for the reason I just shared. All of the things that mark time, the rotation of the earth (a day) the orbit of the moon (a month) and orbit of the earth around the sun (a year) and all the division we can make between them (hours, minutes, seconds) are all things God created... but He existed BEFORE that. He is outside of time and therefore knows who will and will not choose Him. We are, from THAT perspective, predestined but not in the sense of some being create to live and some to be tortured for eternity for nothing within their power... but simply because He foreknows as He exists beyond time.
Except for the fact that:
Romans 12:3b God has allotted to each a measure of faith.
So everyone has that grace available when the Father draws us.
The verse that was brought up Romans 12:3, is that an argument for Previent Grace, (or whatever they call it)Wasn't that Moses speaking to the Israelites about obeying the Mitzvot? Specifically, obeying or not obeying God's Law given to Moses?
If yes, why would he create some human just to let them parish in Hell. Let's try and focus mostly on the doctrine of Election.
Yes, however, the choice included life or death and I used it only to show choice. There are others I can use, many of them, but my point was simply to show both predestination and free will exist in Scripture. To choose one over the other, in some cases pitting one against the other, is unprofitable.Wasn't that Moses speaking to the Israelites about obeying the Mitzvot? Specifically, obeying or not obeying God's Law given to Moses?
The verse that was brought up Romans 12:3, is that an argument for Previent Grace, (or whatever they call it)