It is some really serious stuff, ViaCrucis.... Sadly many Christians seem to think they can eat/drink anything they want, as long as they pray over it....somehow praying over it is going to make something unhealthy - healthy. But it doesn't work that way... For the most part, you can go to most any church and the people in the church are as sick and unhealthy as the people who are in the world... WHY? Because they eat like those in the world. God is no respecter of persons...if we choose to eat like the world then we can expect to be sick like the world...
Wine sometimes means GRAPE JUICE in the Bible, and sometimes it means ALCOHOL. Two very different things called by the same name....makes it a little confusing sometimes!
There is something wonderful about Lutheran sarcasm.Seeing as I don't want to go to Hell, perhaps you could help me with this question.
What diet should I be on in order to be a True Christian(TM)? Should I do the Atkins? Should I avoid red meat altogether? Should I only eat green vegetables?
Since I want to go to heaven when I die, and since my body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, and thus to not take care of my body means I'm not on the road to Heaven, then this seems like some really serious stuff I should consider.
I'm overweight, obese even. Is my soul at risk for eternal damnation? Which also begs the question, why does God hate fat people? Or is it because Jesus only died for the physically fit? I'm a bit confused.
I ate some pizza the other day, I assume that definitely scored me low on the divine brownie point level.
I was about to have an ice cold Coca Cola, but seeing as it contains high fructose corn syrup and caffeine, I suppose I should rethink that--it will put my eternal soul in jeopardy after all.
And perhaps at this point you are able to see why conflating the temple language of St. Paul with physical fitness is of course absurd (it isn't what he means) and also why attempting to delineate a person's eternal destiny to matters of physical health to be wholly abominable.
Unless of course you really do want to explain to me why the Gospel doesn't apply to obsese people like myself. In which case I'm all ears. By all means, here's a shovel, you're welcome to keep digging a hole with it.
-CryptoLutheran
Perhaps you could explain how ancient bronze and iron age people living in the ancient near east were able to prevent the pressed juices of grapes from fermenting without pasteurization and refrigeration. Two technologies that did not exist until the end of the 19th/beginning of the 20th century.
Because here's what happens: I squeeze some grapes and get the juice. In the air all around me are natural yeasts that will settle in the juice, those yeasts will start to convert the natural sugars into alcohol. That means wine happens without human intervention, it requires human intervention to stop the natural fermentation process, and that can only happen by obstructing the growth of the yeast, such as by pasteurizing it; and secondly by keeping it sufficiently cold will inhibit potential further microbial growth.
Without these modern technologies, nature happens.
They no more drank grape juice in the Bible than I have a pet pink unicorn.
-CryptoLutheran
All great points. I don't believe the pasteurization of grape juice happened until 1869. So I can't see them drinking grape juice in Biblical times.ViaCrucis said:Perhaps you could explain how ancient bronze and iron age people living in the ancient near east were able to prevent the pressed juices of grapes from fermenting without pasteurization and refrigeration. Two technologies that did not exist until the end of the 19th/beginning of the 20th century. Because here's what happens: I squeeze some grapes and get the juice. In the air all around me are natural yeasts that will settle in the juice, those yeasts will start to convert the natural sugars into alcohol. That means wine happens without human intervention, it requires human intervention to stop the natural fermentation process, and that can only happen by obstructing the growth of the yeast, such as by pasteurizing it; and secondly by keeping it sufficiently cold will inhibit potential further microbial growth. Without these modern technologies, nature happens. They no more drank grape juice in the Bible than I have a pet pink unicorn. -CryptoLutheran
Yes, for sure! Alcohol destroys brain cells...The Bible says, "If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him. God's temple is holy. And you are that temple." 1 Corinthians 3:17.
The Herd Principle
A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.
"In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we know, kills brain cells. But naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first.
In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers.
Cliff Clavin (Cheers)
BTW if I get a particularly bad flu, I will take the version of NyQuil with alcohol over the alcohol-free version. It helps me sleep better and induces drowsiness.OGM said:...a lot of that going on! As far a drinking alcohol goes...I don't drink it because I had to drink NyQuil for several weeks straight when I was 6 years old. Back then it was 25% (50 proof). I had the flu and the doctor prescribed it, accidentally. After that I didn't like the taste of alcohol. That being said...I don't have a problem with people drinking responsibly. Besides, Jesus turned the water in to wine, not grape juice. So I can't see a glass of wine being sinful.
All great points. I don't believe the pasteurization of grape juice happened until 1869. So I can't see them drinking grape juice in Biblical times.
As for non-alcoholic wine...you have to take normal alcoholic wine and extract the alcohol. Usually, it is done through distilling the wine to separate and remove the majority of the alcohol. Under U.S. Federal guidelines, non-alcoholic wine can still contain up to 0.5% of alcohol by volume.
It would be very expensive trying to remove ALL of the alcohol from a wine...even in 2014. Hence the 0.5% allowance.
My point is that I feel it is IMPOSSIBLE for all of this alcohol-free grape juice to be floating around 2000 years ago. Between the climate and the technology of the day...how?
As I explained earlier I don't drink because I just don't have a taste for alcohol. But even I can tell you that Jesus didn't turn the water in to the equivalent of WELCH'S GRAPE JUICE. The Bible said he turned it in to wine. I am going with that.
It only seems to be in modern Western cultures that people drink purely for the sake of drinking. Around the Mediterranean alcohol has traditionally only been consumed along with food. Having a full stomach dramatically reduces the rate at which alcohol is absorbed into the bloodstream as well as physically limiting how much alcohol can go into the stomach. Plus I'm unclear where this idea that wedding banquets lasted a week comes from. Do you have anything to back up that assertion?I understand where you are coming from, MoreCoffee.... I don't believe that when Jesus turned water into "wine" that it was alcoholic wine...I believe it was grape juice. Weddings back then lasted a week. Can you imagine people drinking for a week straight and it not turning into a drunken brawl??? Never....Jesus would not officiate at something like that....
No. Wine means wine.Wine sometimes means GRAPE JUICE in the Bible, and sometimes it means ALCOHOL. Two very different things called by the same name....makes it a little confusing sometimes!
Just interested in your thoughts.
We are defiled by what we do and say, which reflects the condition of our hearts. We are not defiled by having a bacon cheeseburger and a beer.
I admire those who stick to keeping away from alcohol and to eating a clean and healthy diet. But let's not delude ourselves into thinking that wine isn't alcoholic. There is no exegetical, historical, or scientific reason to think that wine in the Bible is anything other than alcoholic wine. That only comes from a doctrinal bias being read back into the Scriptures.
Does being a Teetotaler Make One a Better Christian?
I came back to this thread thinking that I had been entirely too harsh in my last post, as I wrote it with a knee-jerk reaction to what I perceived as grotesque moralism.
However then when I come across this, I'm not entirely sure that I was being too harsh.
This is a deeply troubling theology encapsulated in your posts that goes far beyond legalistic teetotalism.
Here are the things I expect to hear from my pastor on any given Sunday morning:
Jesus Christ, crucified and risen from the dead, for us.
If my pastor decides to play nutritionist and dietician and bogart the sermon toward such ends, I'm finding a new church.
Especially if that pastor has decided to be a quack dietician which seems to be prevalent these days in certain fringe circles of Christendom.
Here's the thing, if I want to down a giant plate of nachos, I can. And all wonky weirdos who are out there talking about how to "eat spiritual" are blowhards that I not only don't have to listen to, I have a spiritual obligation as a Christian to reject and ignore for the sake of the spiritual health of the Church.
Which is all to say, if I had a plate of greasy nachos and an ice cold beer right now, it would be going in my belly. And it would be nobody's business but mine, and my conscience before God would be clear. Because there are actual and real sins, drinking a beer and eating nachos? Not sins.
And I have no intention of allowing myself to be judged by the sorts of people St. Paul mentions in Colossians ch. 2.
-CryptoLutheran
Grape juice was impossible prior to the invention of pasteurization about 100 years ago. Grapes begin to ferment on the wine. New wine is even more alcoholic than aged wine.I understand where you are coming from, MoreCoffee.... I don't believe that when Jesus turned water into "wine" that it was alcoholic wine...I believe it was grape juice. Weddings back then lasted a week. Can you imagine people drinking for a week straight and it not turning into a drunken brawl??? Never....Jesus would not officiate at something like that....
Wine sometimes means GRAPE JUICE in the Bible, and sometimes it means ALCOHOL. Two very different things called by the same name....makes it a little confusing sometimes!
Just interested in your thoughts.
"pledged to total abstinence from intoxicating drink,"
Ok, i had to look it up and found this from the linked site:
Online Etymology Dictionary
A question:
What is a "better" Christian. IS there such a thing?
Yes, for sure! Alcohol destroys brain cells...The Bible says, "If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him. God's temple is holy. And you are that temple." 1 Corinthians 3:17.
As Christians, our bodies are the temple of God and it is our responsibility to take care of our bodies...
Drinking socially is the first step towards becoming an alcoholic...and like you said...every instance of drunkenness in the Bible is associated with someone committing some pretty bad sins...
Alcohol and Christianity DON'T go together...never have and never will....Yes, there are some who want to think they can have their alcohol and still be on the road to Heaven...but sooner or later, they will find out they were wrong...I just hope they find out before it is too late...