Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How about this...
Not all Soldiers are ignorant, Stan. I serve consciously for my country and certainly we disagree about war and issues like that but I do not think I am ignorant. It is arrogant to think you have the monopoly on a proper world view.
What makes being a Soldier noble is the notion that you are ready to sacrifice your life for another person just as a policeman or a fireman. Isn't that noble?
If it isn't, why not?![]()
Apart from anything else, some of us have loved ones in the forces.
I know your question was specifically about modern day soldiers, but what about soldiers from earlier time periods?
Too broad a question. But I'll take WW2 as an example, and I do have respect for the people who fought the Nazis. But the key difference was we were under attack.
So it would have been fine with you if the Nazis exterminated the Jews, Gypsies, Gays, 'Defectives' and Slavs as long as they let us alone?
So the British were wrong to fight the American colonies since they (the British) were not under attack?
No. But then the Nazis exterminated millions of people, and is not comparable to any modern day regime that I know of, certainly not the Ba'ath party or Taleban regime.
Is Pol Pot modern? On a percentage basis there are several modern regimes that at least rival Nazi Germany.
Kurds might look at the Regime of the Ba'ath party quite differently htan you do. But there are not so many Kurds, so I guess they don't matter.
Yeah, guess who used a veto when the UN security council demanded actions against the massacre of the Kurds in 1988. (And guess who supplied the weapons used to kill them, now that we're at it.)20 years too late to start using that as an excuse for invading.
Yeah, guess who used a veto when the UN security council demanded actions against the massacre of the Kurds in 1988. (And guess who supplied the weapons used to kill them, now that we're at it.)
More to the point, why any of that would make me respect the modern day soldiers who are over there now, I have even less of an idea.
Once again, you're showing ignorance by buying into everything the media is saying about Iraq. Would you have respect for someone who sacrificed their life, in order for another to live? Would you respect the one, who took a life in order to save 5? 10? 15+?
I have to admit, I have none.. or very little.
The peacekeepers perhaps,
but 98% of the others, I'm afraid not. And this is coming from someone whose parents were both in the army. I just don't see why anyone would so want to become part of the machinery of the state. Especially not one fighting in the BS wars that Britain and other western countries currently shame themselves in.
Everyone likes to say how we should respect people who are out there fighting for our freedom, but lets face it, all the people I know who joined the army are there because they spent 10 years messing around at school instead of knuckling down. So I guess the thought of playing around with guns and killing innocent people is probably quite appealing to these sorts.
So if someone comes home in a body bag... well that is an occupational hazard I'm afraid. I feel a little bit of sympathy for people who get maimed and lose their legs and stuff, as I would for any human being who ends up like that, but I'm afraid you reap what you sow.
I have problems with thinking in terms of "respect" (or lack thereof) when it comes to anonymous crowds.
That said, I must admit that I personally have little understanding for anyone who thinks of organized state-sponsored mass killing in an alleged "us vs. them" scenario as a legitimate means of problem solving, and even less for those who engage in it or join an organisation that serves this purpose.
I just don´t get it.
Whose lives exactly are the modern day soldiers saving in Iraq?
According to jmersville, as well the German and Pol Pot´s soldiers were noble in that they were willing to lay down their lives.Is Pol Pot modern? On a percentage basis there are several modern regimes that at least rival Nazi Germany.
I feel for the family and friends of soldiers who come back in body bags, or end up having to give up their lives to become full time carers for the maimed, but lets be fair, it isn't me who puts them through that, and my criticism isn't going to change a whole lot. The only thing I can recommend is not to turn on the TV, listen to the radio, pick up a newspaper or browse the internet.
I realise all these comments are cold, and if they upset you I apologise, but sometimes you have to tell it like it is. Sure, I place most the blame on the leaders but I don't think anyone, including our troops, are beyond criticism. And to exonerate the very people who make it happen from guilt, is wrong. The old, "they are only doing their job" routine doesn't quite sit well with me.