ARBITER01
Legend
- Aug 12, 2007
- 14,682
- 2,097
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Republican
That actually may be the case - one of my favorite teachers claims that he doesn't think they were saved yet until later in Acts.
& some of the proof he used was that they didn't understand nearly anything Jesus was saying.
Even the parables, Jesus had to explain it all to them.
If you remember, the parables were veiled truth - the problem is, it was still veiled to them & they were Jesus' own.
I think the veil might have been lifted for them later on. Just speculation, we can't honestly know & that's why I don't think it's needs harsh debate.
Nobody can prove either side of that one, different scriptures can lend support to each side.
You make a good point on this also, and your right, it should not have a lot of debate on it.
The point of bringing it up in this thread was really to show that water was not the source towards receiving anything from GOD in the way of salvation. John the baptist pointed folks towards Jesus and His immersion into The Holy Spirit as the true immersion of repentance, that John's was only water as symbolic of the true spiritual one to be from Jesus.
We got into a little debate about when that immersion "into" the forgiveness of our sins was able to happen from Jesus, but the real point here was the difference between the symbolic and the spiritual presented in the scriptures.
Upvote
0