No, I'm only going to multiply it by 2 at most. I live in a large metro area and protestant churches stopped meeting Sunday nights decades ago, with maybe one service mid-week, so that's two total.
You're joking, right? That doesn't even happen in small churches, much less the ones you describe that are so big they supposedly meet 4 times per week. No, that's what all the assistant pastors do, with each assistant getting their own secretary.
I'll pass on the book since I'm sure he doesn't explain how he can show up to 'work' at 10 am, take a 90 minute lunch, and leave at 4 pm while having such a heavy burden of so much responsibility on his shoulders.
If pastors ever form a union, you might be qualified as their bargaining representative. Did you ever belong to a union?
Even if all the things you describe were true and legitimate full-time job functions, the pastor is still going to complain about not enough volunteer service from others while he gets paid for everything he does. Maybe we should divide the pastor's salary by each hour he puts in, then pay the volunteers that much per hour.
Then he'll get up and complain about the complainers, which means he's no better than they are cause he's complaining. But that's another topic. It all falls under the heading of 'what's good enough for you isn't good enough for me' hypocrisy.
I'll take it that your answer to my original post is a resounding NO, even though you never actually answer the question, it's pretty obvious. Are you a pastor? Is there one in your family? Why the bias? Why the support of hypocrisy?