- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,999
- 52,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Present company excluded?If you did attempt to go and get a PhD from scratch it would at least keep you more constructively occupied for the next ten years than posting the oceans of total drivel on the internet that you are going to spend your time doing instead.
I stopped here:
"With the advent of Darwins theory of evolution, and the billions of years which were postulated as necessary for that alleged process to be achieved (cf. Jastrow 1977, 112), the religious community, ever mesmerized by the speculations of science, came to the stark realization that the biblical record of earth history could never be harmonized with the escalating theories of geologic dogmatism."
The estimate for the age of the earth has nothing to do with Darwin's theory of evolution. Also, I have no idea what "escalating theories of geologic dogmatism" means. How does dogma, which must remain the same, "escalate?"
This is rhetorical garbage. Next.
Most mutations are deleterious or neutral. The ones that are benevolent are rare, but they do exist. They do not, however, create new genetic information
From fish to amphibian, and amphibian to mammal, increased complexity...
If you did attempt to go and get a PhD from scratch it would at least keep you more constructively occupied for the next ten years than posting the oceans of total drivel on the internet that you are going to spend your time doing instead.
How about I go have my picture taken next to Richard Dawkins instead?Don't forget... 783... 784... 785.. Hey everyone! Look at me and be in awe of my post count! Doesn't that make me special!
I can think of a better example.I am often surprised by those that reject evolution and their lack of knowledge upon the subject
For example.....
I can think of a better example.
Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
LOL ... looks like either way I'm a liar.
Jesus is omniscient -- that means He knows all about evolution -- and He rejects evolution.? I do not understand the idea you are trying to propagate...
Jesus is omniscient -- that means He knows all about evolution -- and He rejects evolution.
That's good enough for me.
It's a secret.Where exactly in the Bible did Jesus reject evolution?
Jesus is omniscient -- that means He knows all about evolution -- and He rejects evolution.
That's good enough for me.
It's a secret.
It was Jesus Who created Adam & Eve in the first place ... so He would certainly know, wouldn't He?Circular logic
A religion which occurred far after evolution rejects what came before it so you will reject it on the basis of it saying so.
That's okay ... it looks like you're getting plenty of help from another source.Well, shucks -- I knew there'd be trouble when I left my Bible Decoder Ring in my other pants.
It was Jesus Who created Adam & Eve in the first place ... so He would certainly know, wouldn't He?
It was Jesus Who created Adam & Eve in the first place ... so He would certainly know, wouldn't He?
Circular logical fallacy again. Jesus says he is god in the New Testament so you say he created Adam in the past although no such mentioning is in the Tawrat.
I really wish to know why on a logical level you reject evolution. I myself can quote the Qur'an all day long to you and it would mean nothing
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?