• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do you agree with these statements?

Pavel Mosko

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2016
7,236
7,320
58
Boyertown, PA.
✟816,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single


I think I agree with all of that, but I'm interested in what your going to do with it. It's quite common to equate how an individual species can adapt vs. the actual Evolution of that species into a new species.

A great case in point the famous story of the moths of London, back in the days of the Industrial Revolution. Those moths were white to start out, but with mass pollution, the white moths became eaten by the birds and gradually the dark colored moths took over. But you know what, at some point the factories of the area went away, and so did that kind of mass level of pollution and the whole color of the moths had to shift back back to the original white color again....
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,217
10,104
✟282,654.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
How do you account for ring species?

Aside: It wasn't London.
 
Upvote 0

Pavel Mosko

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2016
7,236
7,320
58
Boyertown, PA.
✟816,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
How do you account for ring species?

Aside: It wasn't London.

Ah I didn't know that term, but was actually thinking about salamander cases earlier which apparently is one.

Sure there is something to that.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Neither of those characterisations are reasonable.

Israel had incredible preparedness and intelligence and Germany was massively overextended and unprepared for the environments they fought in.

So in the case of Germany you don't think the fittest were defeated?
 
Upvote 0

Pavel Mosko

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2016
7,236
7,320
58
Boyertown, PA.
✟816,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
@Shemjaza

lol I'm still trying to figure out how the convo got on the Israel and WWII.

I will agree with Carl on Israel etc. If you look at battles, and wars etc. Israel was way way out numbered compared to Germany. Most of the time, on the Western front Germany was facing a 5:1 ratio against them on the ground, while Israel on the other hand was facing something like a 30:1 disadvantage in some of their battles. Israel was in a position where they had to do everything right, as well as have some luck / divine intervention, plus have lots of and lots of aid from the US.. to survive.

But the 30 to 1, ratio is very impressive. It is very hard defending something like a well built fortress with those kind of odds let alone a field of sand dunes.... which is what Israel managed to do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We got onto this topic because the logical thesis of the survival of the fittest does not work out in History because there are forces at play that defy logic. For this reason evolution is not real because outcomes depend on more than what is physically seen.
 
Upvote 0

Pavel Mosko

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2016
7,236
7,320
58
Boyertown, PA.
✟816,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single

lol

yeah I went back and read the old posts, seemed a bit of a non-sequitur.

In terms of fittest, Israel was very fit as far as professionalism etc. but they definitely should not have won some of those battles and wars even if they had superior tech, training and tactics. There comes a time where there just are two many folks to deal with. And especially in those tank battles! For crying out loud Sherman tanks in WWII could prevail against the superior German Tigers and Panthers with 5 to 1 or greater odds most of the time in a pitched battle by bum rushing the enemy and shooting them in the rear at close range.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Pavel, I think you meant the allies not Israel in your first sentence...
 
Reactions: Pavel Mosko
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
To be fair, I have seen strong evidence of the survival of the fittest flying over Africa and seeing that the tribal wars resulted in the survival of the fittest and most intelligent winning tribal wars and getting the best land. The Bemba from Malawi are such a people and are sought after to work in the Mines of South Africa. They are strong and sharp and from the air it shows, with very prolific farming within their borders. I had the privilege of teaching a Bemba, electronics in Zambia. His hobby was ball room dancing.

However as i have pointed out - it is not always the more capable that win the battles.
 
Reactions: Pavel Mosko
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,217
10,104
✟282,654.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Then it's just as well that the early example of a sound-bite, 'survival of the fittest', is a poor encapsulation of evolutionary theory. In fairness it has misled a fair number of evolutionists, though not near as many as the misguided creationists. If you had studied the field you would be aware of this.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,143
✟349,282.00
Faith
Atheist
Is the idea that instances of triumph over seemingly impossible odds are a refutation of evolution because... miracles?

That's an argument?
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I think it is relevant to ask what training you have in recognising morphological patterns in the fossil record. I so ask.
Morphology across species in the fossil record does not occur, how can someone be trained. To observe a mechanism that does not occur in the fossil record?

Your desperately trying to convince me that angiosperms, did not just suddenly appear in the fossil record. They evolved gradually?

"Unfortunately, there are no simple explanations for the diversity and ecological dominance of the flowering plants. "Very probably no single theory can explain the massive rise of the angiosperms" admits Berendse.
(The abominable mystery: How flowers conquered the world)
 
Reactions: Tone
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is the idea that instances of triumph over seemingly impossible odds are a refutation of evolution because... miracles?

That's an argument?

That depends on your rules of argument...
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
No it doesn't.
Yes it does.

It is impossible to propose that any mutation can be a random mutation. The simple reason is that it is impossible to know if random events are even possible.

That kind of vocabulary (random) is not justified.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟438,205.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have also studied the History and philosophy of science and soon learned that the rules of argument excluded the possibility of absolutes.

Such rules of argument postulate that objective truth is beyond our grasp and all thinking is merely relative.

Therefore I like to point out that at times that the facts of history do not always support our analysis of 'reality' because we have a flawed philosophical starting point.
 
Reactions: klutedavid
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Why deny something that the fossil record merely does not confirm in all cases?
Because you are convinced that Speciation is the mechanism. An abrupt appearance of species is not a gradual transition.
in some cases has been relatively well confirmed in the fossil record and at the present time there is no credible alternative explanation for the emergence of species.
If there is, at this time, no credible alternative to speciation. Does that then mean that the concept of the evolution of species is therefore correct?
Still, to remain unconvinced of it is not unreasonable. Outright denial requires further information.
I have seen the evolution of scientific ideology over a very long time. I also understand why these ideologies exist and how they are generated.

I can very safely argue that the scientific paradigm is a flawed paradigm.
 
Reactions: Tone
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The fact that it is beyond science to examine the 'metaphysical' does not mean it does not exist.
I object to the usage of the term 'metaphysical'. Given that we cannot establish the definition of a 'natural' world.

Who has been generating these ideas, this terminology.
 
Reactions: Tone
Upvote 0