Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

[KWCrazy]

Sorry KW, you'll have to do better than that. I suggest that you start by correcting your misconceptions regarding evolution.

Are you rejecting the claim of common origins now; of original progenitors?
It's YOUR lie, not mine. I was never gullible enough to believe it.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Scientific theories are proclaimed as indisputable fact all the time, that is until they are disproved by the newest and latest discovery.

Proclaimed by whom? The scientists, or the media?

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Are you rejecting the claim of common origins now; of original progenitors?
It's YOUR lie, not mine. I was never gullible enough to believe it.

No, I'm rejecting your strawman, and suggesting that you correct your misconceptions before embarrassing yourself further.

 

[amariselle]

For example?

You don't think that believing the universe and the earth and everything in it came from absolutely nothing takes faith?

 

[amariselle]

Proclaimed by whom? The scientists, or the media?

Scientists.

 

[Archaeopteryx]

You don't think that believing the universe and the earth and everything in it came from absolutely nothing takes faith?

Who said that it came from absolutely nothing?

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Scientists.

That isn't true at all. Scientists don't tend to proclaim their findings as "indisputable fact."

 

[KWCrazy]

If you are saying I ever said humans evolved into daffodils I'd have to call you a liar.
The ToE SPECIFICALLY claims a common original progenitor; or do you wish to re-define evolution?

 

[Archaeopteryx]

If you are saying I ever said humans evolved into daffodils I'd have to call you a liar.
The ToE SPECIFICALLY claims a common original progenitor; or do you wish to re-define evolution?

No, I'm saying that you don't know what you're talking about and that your understanding of evolution is too poor to have a productive conversation.

 

[amariselle]

Who said that it came from absolutely nothing?

Oh plenty of people have. Where do you think it all came from?

 

[joshua 1 9]

You didn't bother to read my post, since absolutely nothing you wrote had anything to do with it.

I had twelve posts to respond to and I only got to a few of them.

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Oh plenty of people have. Where do you think it all came from?

I don't know.

 

[amariselle]

That isn't true at all. Scientists don't tend to proclaim their findings as "indisputable fact."

And yet many do.

 

[amariselle]

I don't know.

Fair enough.

 

[Archaeopteryx]

And yet many do.

No, that's what religious people tend to do. Scientists are typically quite cautious when presenting their findings, urging the need for further study.

 

[joshua 1 9]

What does any of that blurb have to do with the question of the authorship of the Bible?

Yes

 

[Archaeopteryx]

Fair enough.

And for that matter, no one knows.

 

[TLK Valentine]

I had twelve posts to respond to and I only got to a few of them.

You claimed you got to mine... in fact, you accused me of doing what you yourself are now admitting to.

Matthew 7:5, anyone?

 

[amariselle]

No, that's what religious people tend to do. Scientists are typically quite cautious when presenting their findings, urging the need for further study.

Not always, this is why some creationists have argued back so strongly, because scientific views have been claimed as absolutely factual.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Scientists.

For example?