I highly suspect you don't know what you're talking about.
It's also poor reasoning:
1) Sex is for procreation
2) No other meaning can be derived
3) Therefore, without procreation sex is meaningless
The problem with your argument is in the second premise, since many have found meaning in sex outside of procreation. Hence why I have a vasectomy, but still love having sex. lol
I think you're conflating human sexuality, physiological sex, sex, and sexual reproduction.
I know what you said... and once again, you're completely wrong.I DID NOT SAY SEX
I SAID SEXUALITY - you don't need SEXUALITY for pleasure. The only thing you need it for is procreation.
I know what you said... and once again, you're completely wrong.
Human sexuality by definition isn't necessarily about procreation
What you're talking about here is physiological sex and sexual reproduction. Not sexuality.Of course it is.
Why on earth would the sexes come about if not as different roles in reproduction.
It's their raison d'etre.
What you're talking about here is physiological sex and sexual reproduction. Not sexuality.
Physiological sex:
Sex - Wikipedia
Sexual reproduction:
Sexual reproduction - Wikipedia
Sexuality:
Human sexuality - Wikipedia
These are all different topics you keep conflating, which was my original point.
Incorrect, without philological sex, procreation is meaningless... not sexuality. I feel like we're going in circles, do more research.
"Sex" (an action) is not the same as "sex" (a form of individual).
The reason, I ask because it said we are no longer given in marriage and we are like angels. So are just stop being sexual brings? Sex is big part of being human after all. Your input brothers and Sister in Christ.
Danny
4. A Detailed Description of Dr. Eby's Spirit Body
.......
"Lord Jesus, why am I now a neuter? I was a man."
Jesus replied:
"Yes, Dick, you were always a man, a child of God who returned our love by telling others of the good news about me. Remember? You read in my book the very first order I gave to Adam and Eve? 'Be fruitful and multiply!' I told them to replenish the Earth, not heaven. Again I told the Sadducees (who did not believe in a resurrection) that they 'knew not the scriptures' when they speculated about wives in heaven. I explained that after the resurrection all would be like angels who do not marry nor raise families. Everything in heaven is created or re-created into perfection! It is all in my book. None other is truth!" (Dr. Richard Eby, near-death
.com/science/articles/richard-eby-and-secomd-coming-of-christ.html#a04
Gender is a part of our identity. Theres no reason to believe it won't carry over to the next life. To think God will strip us of our genitals, of our identity and make us like the angels is absurd. He wants a family of sons and daughters not another set of angels.
Gender is a part of our identity. Theres no reason to believe it won't carry over to the next life. To think God will strip us of our genitals, of our identity and make us like the angels is absurd. He wants a family of sons and daughters not another set of angels.
On the other hand Adam and Eve had to repopulate the earth......
not heaven.
Why would God make sex pleasurable... what you're saying isn't logical.
If you're actually suggesting that Christianity teaches married couples can't take pleasure in sex, I think that would be the last straw for me... I mean, that really takes the cake
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?