The distinction is bogus, as I stated. God wants us to be saved. That is his will. However, he does not force us to accept him.
If you say the distinction is bogus, then your accusation against Calvinists is nonsensical.
Here is what you said:
If God wills all men to be saved, Calvinists must believe in universal salvation.
Help me out, Calvinists.
God wills all men to be saved, or God wants all men to be saved, same thing...
And of course Calvinists have been helping point out to you that we dont believe God forces people to be saved. So your insistence just shows your ignorance of Calvinism...
How is the meaning different?
3For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
3This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, 4who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
3This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.
Ive already explained the difference in earlier posts...but of course, see the response below...
But certainly not everything God wills or desires is conditional based on man's response.
So what? I never made such a claim.
So in other words you are saying Luke 22:22 was Gods will that Jesus be crucified. That the plan for crucifixion was NOT conditional on mans response. Which means that you are in agreement with Calvinism.
Now we go back to 1 Tim 2:4 where God wants/wills/desires all men to be saved. Will every single person be saved?
If you say yes, then you are clearly a universalist. If you say no, then you are making a distinction between Gods will or Luke 22:22 and Gods want/will/desire of 1 Tim 2:4....just like Calvinists.
Calvinists believe that God judges with partiallity applying no regard to man's merit or repentance.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
Calvinists hold to Matthew 16:27:
[FONT="]For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father's glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what he has done.[/FONT]
Calvinists believe that God chooses those that he will save and rejects those whom he will damn.
Yes, you at least got this one right. Gods wrath already rests on all of mankind. Romans says that unbelievers are already condemned. God however in His grace and mercy has chosen and called those that He will save.
Calvinists believe in unconditional election.
Based on Romans 8:29-30
29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30 And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.
Predestined - called - justfied - glorified. That is a very tight - and Biblical - sequence set forth by Paul...
Why are Calvinists always denying their doctrine, or avoiding the logical flaws in their doctrine?
Why not admit the flaws and move on to a more biblical Christianity?
First of all, critics of Calvinism ought to get their facts straight about Calvinism. Its very easy to dismiss someone who distorts what they criticize. Its ironic when the critic is insisting on beliefs that Calvinists themselves dont hold. Second, critics of Calvinism ought to be respectful. Those who come across as disrespectful, rude and arrogant are also easily dismissed. Third, those who only offer anti-Calvinist arguments without alternatives are airing empty words. Its as if they are afraid of putting forth their own view in case it might be criticized.
But of course, the worst thing a critic of Calvinism can do to affirm a Calvinists own view is to ignore the Scripture and questions set forth in counter argument by Calvinists.
LDG