• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do seekers find? Or do only "founders", seek?

Status
Not open for further replies.

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
holdon said:
Yes, I believe that God is "heartsick and frustrated" in a certain sense.
No, I don't believe He is powerless at all.
Yes, I believe He cannot get what He wants so much...
No, don't believe He is at the mercy of the men. Rather men are at the mercy of Him...

So now you're backing off of what you said? You agreed He was powerless to change things, now you say He is not powerless.

Of course, you know I do not conceive of God as you do. My Bible reveals Him to be the Sovereign Lord of the Universe, who accomplishes all of His Will, and is in complete and total control of all that has been, is or will be. Nothing happens that is not exactly as He has both foreordained and purposed, and He makes even the wrath of men accomplish His Will perfectly. Nothing takes Him by surprise, he has not had to execute a "plan B" because man frustrated Him or caused His Will to fail.

He has given men the power to choose, but men have corrupted that ability, as God ordained to show forth His Glory in the redemption of the Elect, and the reprobation of the damned. God knows every choice of every man to the end of time, and has incorporated all of those choices, made freely by men but foreknown by Him, into His Plan and Purpose in such a way that the man's choice is not constrained, nor is God's Will not accomplished. He is not frustrated, nor is He disappointed, He certainly is not beholden to any man.
 
Upvote 0

holdon

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2005
5,375
97
67
✟6,041.00
Faith
Christian
nobdysfool said:
You agreed He was powerless to change things
Where? Produce the reference where I said that or be held in contempt of forum rules. Or learn how to debate.
now you say He is not powerless.

Of course, you know I do not conceive of God as you do. My Bible reveals Him to be the Sovereign Lord of the Universe, who accomplishes all of His Will, and is in complete and total control of all that has been, is or will be.
Like whether I put sugar in my coffee or not? See Gen. 1:29, 2:16. No, He is not in control of that. Nor whether I sin or not. He will not set me up to sin. Or do you think He does?
Nothing happens that is not exactly as He has both foreordained and purposed, and He makes even the wrath of men accomplish His Will perfectly. Nothing takes Him by surprise, he has not had to execute a "plan B" because man frustrated Him or caused His Will to fail.
Yeah, yeah. I know the music. God wanted the Fall, God wanted sin, God wanted evil, etc.... Error!
 
Upvote 0

Athanasian Creed

Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Solus Christus !!!
Aug 3, 2003
2,368
154
Toronto
Visit site
✟25,984.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
nobdysfool said:
... My Bible reveals Him to be the Sovereign Lord of the Universe, who accomplishes all of His Will, and is in complete and total control of all that has been, is or will be. Nothing happens that is not exactly as He has both foreordained and purposed,

So...even the "mistake of a typist" (as a leading Calvinist apologist attests) is God's doing and will right? I guess the World Wars and the Holocaust was what He both "foreordained and purposed" too right? So...that must make God the Author of sin too, since nothing happens, according to you (and Calvinism), without it being God's will, as you say " exactly as He has both foreordained and purposed"!:scratch::eek:

That is just so....WRONG and so UNSCRIPTURAL...it is plain REVOLTING!:(


Ray :(
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Athanasian Creed said:
So...even the "mistake of a typist" (as a leading Calvinist apologist attests) is God's doing and will right? I guess the World Wars and the Holocaust was what He both "foreordained and purposed" too right? So...that must make God the Author of sin too, since nothing happens, according to you (and Calvinism), without it being God's will, as you say " exactly as He has both foreordained and purposed"!:scratch::eek:

That is just so....WRONG and so UNSCRIPTURAL!:sigh:


Ray :(

even the most random event on earth (the lottery) is governed by The Lord.

Nothing is beyond either His will of permission or His will of Commission .


what IS unscriptrual is a God who sets things in motion then leaves the universe and human history to chance ........... that is deism !
 
Upvote 0

Athanasian Creed

Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Solus Christus !!!
Aug 3, 2003
2,368
154
Toronto
Visit site
✟25,984.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
cygnusx1 said:
even the most random event on earth (the lottery) is governed by The Lord.

Nothing is beyond either His will of permission or His will of Commission


Ah, so God doesn't 'commission' the sin or sinfulness of men but He allows it as part of His 'permissive' will? That doesn't sound like Calvinist teaching to me - when you get right down to it, Calvinism can't escape the fact that it's tenets make God the Author of sin since His will is sovereign and there is no such thing as free-will for either the elect or the reprobates?!:scratch:

WHY didn't God's "sovereign will" prevent sin from entering the world, in the first place?? And secondly, what is the reason Christians sin?? Is it also God's will that they sin as well?:scratch:


Ray:wave:
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Athanasian Creed said:
Ah, so God doesn't 'commission' the sin or sinfulness of men but He allows it as part of His 'permissive' will? That doesn't sound like Calvinist teaching to me - when you get right down to it, Calvinism can't escape the fact that it's tenets make God the Author of sin since His will is sovereign and there is no such thing as free-will for either the elect or the reprobates?!:scratch:

WHY didn't God's "sovereign will" prevent sin from entering the world, in the first place?? And secondly, what is the reason Christians sin?? Is it also God's will that they sin as well?:scratch:


Ray:wave:


what are you on about "it does not sound like Calvinism to me" ?????????????????????????:confused:

How many times must posters inform other posters to get a first hand knowledge of this subject before they begin burning a million straw ,,,, donkeys ????

had you done some homework on this you wouldn't have blundered.

here let this quote help enlighten you , notice carefully that it is based on the a Calvinist confession of Faith



GIRS syllabus index: Survey Studies in Reformed Theology
Theology Proper index: Theology Proper
Theology Proper - Lesson 4
The Decrees of God
by Pastor Bob Burridge ©1997

God's decrees do not lead to Fatalism
Christians often have a hard time understanding what separates two very different views about what directs all things toward their certain outcome. The one is fatalism and the other is the concept called predestination.
The difficulty comes from two influences at work in our fallen nature. The one is a desire to imagine that the individual, not anything outside of him, has ultimate control of his own destiny. And there is a revulsion against the concept of a personal and sovereign God who is beyond our full comprehension.
The idea of personal control of all things leads to the one extreme which denies that the end of all things has any determined element to it. Pure naturalism dominates the thinking of Western culture in our present era. Physical laws and human choices are seen as the controlling factors for the direction of events in history.
But there has also been a long persisting understanding that there is something more moving all things toward a fixed goal. So to preserve the second prejudice against the control of a personal God some have accepted the view of fatalism.
Thankfully, the believer is not left to speculate upon such things from within his own human prejudices. He has a Bible which records God's own words clearly ruling out the uncertainty of events, and at the same time marking the difference between his sovereign control and the pagan idea of fatalism.
Fatalism views god as nothing more than the workings of natural or unknown impersonal forces which make all things come out in some predetermined way. The Stoic called it Destiny. One scholar explained fate by imagining man as a water-beetle caught in a torrent of water. He may struggle, or he may let himself be swept along in peace simply accepting his doom. If we see God's providence as nothing more than fate, then the best we can hope for is to resign ourselves to the horrors that may lie ahead, and be swept along by blind destiny.
That is not the biblical picture of God's providence. Fate is like the workings of a machine without reason or purpose. The God of Scripture acts personally to carry out his plan to a specific, known goal by directing all things for his own glory and for the blessing of his people.
The Bible makes it clear that God brings about everything he determines should happen. Nothing can occur that will ruin his plan. Psalm 115:3, Psalm 135:6 and Job 42:2 are among the passages that make this point. Even acts of sin and evil are permitted to occur so that they be used to serve God's end. While this does not make evil to be good, it shows that evil is never beyond God's control. God may control evil without being said to cause it. Evil condemns the rebel but is employed to reveal more of the glorious perfections of God (see Genesis 50:20, Acts 2:23 4:27-28). The personal nature of God gave Job the courage to say, "Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him!" (Job 13:15)
There is no heresy greater than that which reduces the loving work of our Sovereign God to mere natural forces at work blindly. We are created in his image as persons, not as machines. We act and think and choose. We alone are responsible for our sin. But, as for the good we do, our faith, repentance and obedience, God alone provides the ability. He gives life to our fallen hearts, turns us by his Holy Spirit and gives us a new nature that impels us to do good. Yet even in his work of grace, we come as persons made willing, not as machines or as rebels screaming and kicking against his redeeming love.
The biblical position is not the same as fatalism. Fate drags us to an irrational destiny with no purpose and does not consider us as real persons. Predestination has a good purpose and is designed by a loving God to reveal his own glory and to produce benefits for his people. The biblical doctrine treats us as persons who participate as real beings who reflect the sovereign work of God on our hearts. The biblical teaching does not let us blame God for our rebellion, yet it will equally not let us take credit for our restoration or for the good we do.
In 1904 Dr. B. B. Warfield wrote an article for the Presbyterian magazine explaining the difference between the biblical doctrine of predestination and the pagan teaching called fatalism. He ended his article with a story that illustrates something of the difference between blind, mechanical fate and the workings of a personal and sovereign God:
"There is a story of a little Dutch boy, which embodies very fairly the difference between God and Fate. This little boy's home was on a dyke in Holland, near a great wind-mill, whose long arms swept so close to the ground as to endanger those who carelessly strayed under them. But he was very fond of playing precisely under this mill. His anxious parents had forbidden him to go near it; and, when his stubborn will did not give way, had sought to frighten him away from it by arousing his imagination to the terrors of being struck by the arms and carried up into the air to have life beaten out of him by their ceaseless strokes. "One day, heedless of their warning, he strayed again under the dangerous arms, and was soon absorbed in his play there -- forgetful of everything but his present pleasures. Perhaps, he was half conscious of a breeze springing up; and somewhat in the depth of his soul, he may have been obscurely aware of the danger with which he had been threatened. At any rate, suddenly, as he played, he was violently smitten from behind, and found himself swung all over at once, with his head downward, up into the air; and then the blows came, swift and hard! O what a sinking of the heart! O what a horror of great darkness! It had to come then! And he was gone!
"In his terrified writhing, he twisted himself about, and looking up, saw not the immeasurable expanse of the brazen heavens above him, but his father's face. At once, he realized, with a great revulsion, that he was not caught in the mill, but was only receiving the threatened punishment of his disobedience. He melted into tears, not of pain, but of relief and joy. In that moment, he understood the difference between falling into the grinding power of a machine and into the loving hands of a father.
"That is the difference between fate and predestination. And all the language of man cannot tell the immensity of the difference."
(Benjamin B. Warfield, 1887-1921)
The Decrees of God
"The decrees of God are, his eternal purpose, according to the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass." (Westminster Shorter Catechism, question #7)
The Extent of the Decrees
Nothing in the universe can be considered to be exempt from God's decrees. While events in the universe can be thought of as conditioned upon other events, it is never accurate to say that any of God's decrees are conditioned upon something not decreed. That would make the condition more absolute in determining the course of events than God. If any single influence is a condition external to God's decrees then he could not control with absolute certainty the outcome of his universe toward his intended end. That conditioning issue would have ultimate sovereign control and would contradict clear statements of God's word.
The approach we will follow in this study will be to enlarge upon what is revealed in Scripture about God's decrees while ruling out some of the common objections raised against this doctrine. Often by correcting misconceptions we are forced to reduce what we believe to the simplest statement based upon biblical fact alone. One of the most common struggles in understanding this doctrine is the presence of evil in God's universe and the free actions of intelligent creatures. If God has foreordained all that comes to pass so that there is no uncertainty that his decrees will be carried out exactly as he intended them, then how does this relate to sinful acts which are admittedly present?
God Is Not the Author of Sin
All the actions of created intelligences are not merely the actions of God. He has created a universe of beings which are said to act freely and responsibly as the proximate causes of their own moral actions. When individuals do evil things it is not God the Creator and Preserver acting. If God was the proximate cause of every act it would make all events to be "God in motion". That is nothing less than pantheism, or more exactly, pandeism. The Creator is distinct from his creation. The reality of secondary causes is what separates Christian theism from pandeism.
God Cannot Sin
Sin is an action or desire contrary to God's moral principles. The Westminster Shorter Catechism, in answer to question #14, defines sin as, "any want of conformity unto, or transgression of, the law of God."
It would contradict God's revealed nature to imagine that he does not accomplish what he wants done, or that he does things contrary to what he wants done. By definition that would be sin and God cannot sin.
1 John 1:5 "...God is light, and in Him there is no darkness at all." James 1:13 "...God cannot be tempted by evil"
James 1:17 "Every good thing bestowed and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation, or shifting shadow."
It is impossible that God, as revealed in Scripture, should choose to do anything contrary to his own desire or nature. God cannot have a "split personality" where he is at odds with himself.
God is Sovereign Over All His Creation
In the previous chapter of the confession concerning God's nature it was shown that God does maintain absolute control over all things. This idea will be taken up further in our study of God's Providence. In this present section we are concerned primarily with his control of the moral actions of persons in his creation.
God is able to prevent men from sinning. For example, God speaking to Abimelech concerning Abraham's wife said ...
Genesis 20:6 "I also kept you from sinning against Me; therefore I did not let you touch her."
God is also able to use the sins of His creatures to accomplish His decrees. When Joseph's brothers conspired to kill him and sell him into slavery it is said...
Genesis 45:7-8 "God sent me before you to preserve for you a remnant in the earth, and to keep you alive by a great deliverance. Now, therefore, it was not you who sent me here, but God; and He has made me a father to Pharaoh and lord of all his household and ruler over all the land of Egypt." Genesis 50:20 "And as for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result to preserve many people alive."
Elsewhere in the Bible the same principle is taught...
Psalm 76:10 "for the wrath of man shall praise Thee;" Acts 14:16 "in the generations gone by He permitted all the nations to go their own ways;"
Psalm 106:15 "so He gave them their request"
Though sin is able to be restrained by God, and though he obviously permits it, he always employs it for his ultimate glory. However sin is never said to be produced by God, and sin is never said to be condoned by him. Sin remains that which is contrary to the moral principles of God.
Since the mind of God is not divided into parts (there are no parts to know something detached from anything else he knows) the decrees relating to sin and evil are not separate things from his overall plan for the universe. Everything is altogether and eternally inclined toward his ultimate plan of glory and good. This indivisible plan is revealed to us in individual parts because that is the way we finite beings come to understand things. Systematic knowledge is only a characteristic of the creature. To divide up the divine mind into such compartments is to degrade the unified and perfect nature of God. Therefore to see sin as an act of God would put him in rebellion against himself. This is inconsistent with the self revealed nature of God and is self contradictory.
All That Is, Exists for God's Glory.
God made all things to declare his nature and glory.
Colossians 1:16 "for in Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities - all things have been created through Him and for Him."
Some things manifest the riches of God's glory:
Romans 9:23 "He did so in order that He might make known the riches of his glory upon vessels of mercy, which he prepared beforehand for glory"
Some things manifest God's wrath:
Romans 9:22 "What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction?"
God, in creating the best kind of universe for making his attributes and glory known, made a universe that would include sin and evil. That does not make evil "good". It does not follow logically. The Scriptures teach that God is not the author of sin or of evil. God's word is not unclear when allowed to speak for itself. The overwhelming testimony of the Bible is agreed upon by all who accept it as God's word. Note that the following highly regarded professors and theological writers all concur on this as a clearly stated biblical fact

http://www.girs.com/library/theology/syllabus/theo4.html
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Summary of Christian Doctrine

Part II: The Doctrine of God and Creation

Chapter VIII: The Divine Decrees



1. The Divine Decrees in General. The decree of God is His eternal plan or purpose, in which He has foreordained all things that come to pass. Since it includes many particulars, we often speak of the divine decrees in the plural, though in reality there is but a single decree. It covers all the works of God in creation and redemption, and also embraces the actions of men, not excluding their sinful deeds. But while it rendered the entrance of sin into the world certain, it does not make God responsible for our sinful deeds. His decree with respect to sin is a permissive decree.
a. Characteristics of the decree. The decree of God is founded in wisdom, Eph. 3:9-11, though we do not always understand it. It was formed in the depths of eternity, and is therefore eternal in the strictest sense of the word, Eph. 3:11. Moreover, it is effectual, so that everything that is included in it certainly comes to pass, Isa. 46:10. The plan of God is also unchangeable, because He is faithful and true, Job 28:13, 14; Isa. 46:10; Luke 22:22. It is unconditional, that is, its execution does not depend on any action of man but even renders such action certain, Acts 2:23; Eph. 2:8. Moreover, it is all-inclusive, embracing the good and the wicked actions of men, Eph. 2:10; Acts 2:28, contingent events, Gen. 50:20, the duration of man's life, Job 14:5; Ps. 39:4, and the place of his habitation, Acts 17:26. With respect to sin it is permissive.

http://www.mbrem.com/shorttakes/berk8.htm
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Divine Decrees

God’s purpose in history is described as His “decree.” Louis Berkhof, in his Manual of Christian Doctrine, defined God’s decree this way: “The decree of God is His eternal plan or purpose, in which He has foreordained all things that come to pass.”

The Westminster Shorter Catechism,Question 7, defines the decree of God similarly: “The decrees of God are, His eternal purpose, according to the counsel of His will, whereby, for His own glory, He hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass.”

The Westminster Confession of Faith (ch. 3:1) explains a bit further about God’s decree saying:

God from all eternity did by the most and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin; nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.

The Westminster Standards carefully assert that God is not the author of sin. The origin of sin was neither in God, nor from His decree in any productive or efficient way. God simply permits sin and at the same time bounds and controls it for His wise and holy ends, even though these ends are inscrutable to men. Similarly, the free agency of the creature is not violated by the purpose of God. Men are free agents and the will of any man is not subject to any sort of coercion by the Creator, even though the acts of men as free agents, fully foreknown by God, can and do accomplish God’s purpose and are therefore certain.

The reality of second causes, with their dependent efficiency, is not destroyed, but rather established by the eternal purpose. The reason for this is that God’s plan includes means and ends in their relation to each other, so that both are alike related to the divine decree, and the result shall surely come to pass.

So God has a purpose in history and that purpose is designed to inspire worship and praise. Even the reality of evil, though God hates it in itself, serves the ultimate purpose of glorifying God.

11 In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will, 12 that we who first trusted in Christ should be to the praise of His glory (Eph 1:11-12, emphasis added).

God rules over all events in history, including evil, for our good and His glory. John Piper says that God is not like a firefighter who gets calls to show up at calamities when the damage is already happening. He is more like the surgeon who plans the cutting he must do and plans it for good purposes. God rules over the beginning of our troubles as well as their end.

But to believe this takes genuine trust in God’s power and goodness. It forces one to come to grips with the Creator/creature distinction. The apostle Paul helps us to realize our place in God’s universe:

14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! 15 For He says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion." 16 So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. 17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth." 18 Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens. 19 You will say to me then, "Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?" 20 But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, "Why have you made me like this?" 21 Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor? 22 What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? (Romans 9:14-24).

Why has God decreed the entrance of sin and evil? According to Paul, God has a double purpose: First, to reveal His wrath against sin; second, to reveal the wealth of His grace as He saves “vessels of mercy.”

What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory (Rom 9:22-23).

More of God is known by the entrance of sin and how He deals with it than would have been possible without the entrance of sin. We must come to accept the fact that God always acts in His own interest. God is the most God-centered person in the universe. Everything He does in history is to magnify and display His glory. You and I exist for God’s purposes, not for ourselves.

Fallen man loves to question God. In Romans 9, Paul gives a stern rebuke to those who do so. In this evil age, men give no thought to their creaturely status and their just condemnation before God. They arrogantly question God’s right to ordain events and to judge.

This kind of back-talk by the creature to his Creator is as absurd as a clay pot arguing with the potter. God has absolute sovereignty over His works. He answers to no one. The unbeliever falsely calls this fatalism. Such a charge displays one’s ignorance. For man’s acts are free acts. Men act out of who and what they are. Men are not robots. God does not compel or coerce them against their desires. Every choice man makes is a free choice (of course, one that is limited by his nature and therefore, fallen man cannot freely choose righteouness apart from the new birth).

http://www.frontlinemin.org/evil.asp
 
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
holdon said:
Where? Produce the reference where I said that or be held in contempt of forum rules.

Post #178, this thread. Last 3 lines. And don't threaten me with forum rules.
holdon said:
Or learn how to debate.

How about you learn how to avoid insulting people?

holdon said:
Like whether I put sugar in my coffee or not? See Gen. 1:29, 2:16. No, He is not in control of that. Nor whether I sin or not. He will not set me up to sin. Or do you think He does?

And He knows every day you put sugar in your coffee, down to the exact number of grains of sugar. He knows the eact number of hairs on your head, and which ones will fall out tomorrow morning. He knows every choice you will make from now until you die, and He has already incorporated the results of those choices into His Purpose and Plan, and those choices will come to pass exactly as he has foreseen them, even the sinful ones.

Sorry you can't accept a God that powerful.

holdon said:
Yeah, yeah. I know the music. God wanted the Fall, God wanted sin, God wanted evil, etc.... Error!

Yeah, yeah, I know you don't have a clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cygnusx1
Upvote 0

holdon

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2005
5,375
97
67
✟6,041.00
Faith
Christian
nobdysfool said:
Post #178, this thread. Last 3 lines. And don't threaten me with forum rules.
Let's see:
He wants something He apparently cannot get.

That's right! "how often would I ...., and ye would not!" Mt 23:37
All because men won't listen....what's a God to do? He must be so frustrated and heartsick...those mean men he created reject Him.
Indeed He is.
The agony He must suffer, because He is powerless to change it!


Exactly!
So, how does that correspond to:
You agreed He was powerless to change things

You see, you're not truthful. I did not "agree" that God was powerless to change things in general. Just that God is powerless to change "it". (I'll leave it up to you to find out what "it" is, since you said it first....) But as usual your mind is predisposed by a certain doctrine, that apparantly precludes you even from reading correctly, posts in this forum of the bible. Ex. reading "my sheep" when it says "the sheep" or reading "God hated Esau before he was born", putting Jn 1:13 before Jn 1:12, etc. etc. The list goes on and on. There are just too many things Calvinism has twisted in the bible. Why am I not surprised at even a lack of integrity when responding to my posts. Because that's what it is.
How about you learn how to avoid insulting people?
(staff edit)
 
Upvote 0

Athanasian Creed

Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Solus Christus !!!
Aug 3, 2003
2,368
154
Toronto
Visit site
✟25,984.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
The (God) of Calvinism – must be the Author of sin, or he is not an absolute Sovereign. So even Satan is but the servant of God who bids His will in every scheming, evil act.

The (God) of the Bible – does not decree sin, but puts the first cause of sin squarely in the laps of free agents. To be sovereign, God does not have to first check with Calvin as to what type of sovereignty He should have. In fact, it takes a greater Sovereign to allow men to have free-will and still be in control. To deny that God is not the Author of sin is to deny Calvinistic sovereignty, which demands that God must be the first cause of everything, including the sinful actions of men. Thankfully, the Scriptures teach otherwise (Ezek. 18:20, Ezek. 33:14, Gen. 3:6, James 1:13-15, Mark 7:20-23)

The Westminster Confession (6.1) states quite specifically that God intended that Adam and Eve would sin: "Our first parents, ... sinned in eating the forbidden fruit. This their sin God was pleased, ... to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory." There has never been a greater insult offered to God in the realm of religion than this. The claim made by the Confession that God "purposed to order" His own creation to experience moral failure is absurd.

The Westminster Confession provides one of the greatest examples of incoherence in the history of religion. On the one hand it claims that angels and men sinned "not by a bare permission" but because they were powerfully bound by God to do so. The Confession claims that Satan and Adam sinned because God created for them a destiny that guaranteed that they would sin. It says, in effect, that Satan and Adam were programmed to sin. After stating that in plain English the Confession then absurdly argues that God had nothing to do with His own divine intentions.

The article in the Confession that states Satan and Adam sinned because of their predestination reads as follows:

5.4 The almighty power, unsearchable wisdom, and infinite goodness of God ... extendeth itself even to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men, and that not by a bare permission, but [by a] ... powerful bounding, and otherwise ordering and governing of them, ... yet so as the sinfulness thereof proceedeth only from the creature, and not from God; who, ... neither is nor can be the author or approver of sin.

When the same statement is quoted, but the emphasis is placed on different wording, the Confession flatly denies the very affirmation that it had just strenuously affirmed. Note that only the emphasis has been altered.

5.4 The almighty power, unsearchable wisdom, and infinite goodness of God ... extendeth itself even to the first fall, and all other sins of angels and men, and that not by a bare permission, but [by a] ... powerful bounding, and otherwise ordering and governing of them, ... yet so as the sinfulness thereof proceedeth only from the creature, and not from God; who, being most holy and righteous, neither is nor can be the author or approver of sin.

The Confession clearly states that sin entered the universe, not by an accident or break down in the exercise of free will, and "not by a bare permission" but by a "powerful bounding" and otherwise "ordering and governing" of the outcome by God. The claim that God predestined Adam and Eve to sin is clearly affirm in another place.

6.1 Our first parents, ... sinned in eating the forbidden fruit. This their sin God was pleased, ... to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory.

After having stated plainly that Adam sinned according to a "powerful bounding", and an irresistible "ordering and governing" of outcomes, and having stated plainly Adam sinned because God "purposed to order it" the Confession makes the contradiction that "the sinfulness thereof proceedeth only from the creature, and not from God."

The Westminster Confession repeatedly affirm that God has "ordain whatsoever comes to pass", including the entrance of sin into the universe, but just as often affirms that God had nothing to do with the very events that He predestined to come to pass. The following statement repeats the same contradiction that we have already noted.

3.1. God from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.

It has to be asked, how could God "ordain whatsoever comes to pass", including the entrance of sin, and at the same time a situation exists in which "neither is God the author of sin". The Confession affirms that God predestined Satan and Adam to sin by a powerful an irresistible "ordering" of events and affirms that God had nothing to do with what He ordered. The Confession affirms that God "purposed"' to order something it elsewhere affirms that He had nothing to do with His own purpose and intention. This is not intelligence, it is self deception and utter nonsense.

The authors of the Confession operated on the principle that because God is God He can do what He likes. In their thinking it does not matter if an idea sounds confusing, if God is involved the idea has to be accepted as it stands. But since the authors of the Confession that invented the confusion no one is obligated to agree with them.

http://www.bibleonly.org/docs/calvinism/sovereignty_of_god.htm

Yes, surely the wicked actions of men have a place in God’s eternal purpose. The Bible makes that abundantly clear. Wicked men may not think they are serving God’s purposes: but they are serving His purposes all the same, even by the most wicked of their acts.
- J. Gresham Machen

"I confess that all descendants of Adam fell by the Divine will," and that "we must return at last to God's sovereign determination, the cause of which is hidden"
- John Calvin, Institutes,III,23,4)

Here is John Calvin quoting Augustine. Institutes Book 1 Chapter 18
(Augustine Enchirid. ad Laurent. cap. 100.) That the apostate angels, by their revolt, and all the reprobate, as far as they themselves were concerned, did what God willed not; but, in regard to his omnipotence, it was impossible for them to do so: for, while they act against the will of God, his will is accomplished in them. Hence he exclaims, "Great is the work of God, exquisite in all he wills! so that, in a manner wondrous and ineffable, that is not done without his will which is done contrary to it, because it could not be done if he did not permit; nor does he permit it unwillingly, but willingly; nor would He who is good permit evil to be done, were he not omnipotent to bring good out of evil," (Augustine in Psalm 111:2.)

According to Calvin's view of Providence, everything that happens, good or bad, is the work of God. Loyal Calvinists taught that every calamity and every fortune is an act of God. When a man does good, God is doing it; when a man does evil, God is doing it. Calvin’s view of God was one of a God in total control of everything that happens. Calvinists then and now call this the sovereignty of God. Calvinists say that God does not merely permit all things good and bad to happen; He causes them. Calvin said God caused everything to happen without exception.

Calvin says, "If God merely foresaw human events, and did not also arrange and dispose of them at his pleasure, there might be room for agitating the question, how far this foreknowledge amounts to necessity; but since he foresees the things which are to happen simply because he has decreed that they are so to happen, it is vain to debate about prescience while it is clear that all events take place by his sovereign appointment."

In Melancthon's commentary on Romans of 1525, we are taught that "God wrought all things, evil as well as good; that he was the author of David's adultery, and the treason of Judas, as well as of Paul's conversion."

See how low Calvinism must stoop in order to preserve its extreme view of God's sovereignty at the expense of His character - there is no getting around the fact that Calvinism makes God the Author of sin! :sigh::help::(


Ray :eek:
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
So Calvinists answer God is not the author of sin , but that is not good enough for the fire thirsty anti- calvinists.............. on you go , continue burning your straw donkeys , here , have some marshmallows for the fire!
If He is the "Author and finisher of our faith" *, and if only whom-He-ELECTS have faith (therefore, those whom He does NOT elect He chooses FOR sin) --- then how can He not also by the "author of sin"? Even if only by "unelection"?


* A misunderstanding of Heb12:2
 
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Ben johnson said:
If He is the "Author and finisher of our faith" *, and if only whom-He-ELECTS have faith (therefore, those whom He does NOT elect He chooses FOR sin) --- then how can He not also by the "author of sin"? Even if only by "unelection"?


* A misunderstanding of Heb13:2

No, Ben, it is YOU who misunderstands Hebrews 12:2. You can't even get the reference right. You have consistently twisted this verse to rob it of its meaning and force. Why? Because it totally undermines your bogus theory. There is no such thing as "unelection", it is a made-up perjorative coined by hatred of Calvinism, and stubborn resistance to the biblical doctrine of Election, as taught by Reformed Theology..

Your conclusion is false, because your intent is to charge God with sin, or more correctly, to falsely charge that Calvinists do. Once again, you display your utter ignorance of Calvinism, and your stubborn unwillingness to correct that ignorance.

The hatred of Calvinism displayed here is truly astounding. The attitudes of the anti-Calvinists violate their own professed beliefs. The misinformation and outright lies thrown about against Calvinism are intellectually and spiritually dishonest.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Ben johnson said:
If He is the "Author and finisher of our faith" *, and if only whom-He-ELECTS have faith (therefore, those whom He does NOT elect He chooses FOR sin) --- then how can He not also by the "author of sin"? Even if only by "unelection"?


* A misunderstanding of Heb12:2

it doesn't get any clearer than this , so if you want to traduce the Calvinist and his position you are doing it not from knowledge but from spite.

"That the apostate angels, by their revolt, and all the reprobate, as far as they themselves were concerned, did what God willed not; but, in regard to his omnipotence, it was impossible for them to do so: for, while they act against the will of God, his will is accomplished in them. Hence he exclaims, "Great is the work of God, exquisite in all he wills! so that, in a manner wondrous and ineffable, that is not done without his will which is done contrary to it, because it could not be done if he did not permit; nor does he permit it unwillingly, but willingly; nor would He who is good permit evil to be done, were he not omnipotent to bring good out of evil," (Augustine in Psalm 111:2.)


[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Predestination - Reprobation Contrasted[/FONT]
[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
1. [The Scripture] does not teach or imply a double predestination. In an attempt to distinguish between election and reprobation we should use predestination for the elect and foreordination for the reprobate.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]2. Election and reprobation rest on different grounds: election on the redeeming love of God that undertakes the salvation of the lost; reprobation on the moral necessity to manifest to the universe the nature and consequences of sin in moral personality. [/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]3. Means are used of God to fulfil the purpose of election, but God uses no means to fulfil His purpose of reprobation. It is left to sin to run its course and receive its wages. [/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]4. The fruits of election are attributable to divine grace, the fruits of reprobation to personal sin. This means that while there is grace to some, there is injustice to none. [/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]5. While God finds pleasure in the salvation of the elect, He has sworn by Himself that He has no pleasure in the death of the wicked. God does not need sin or its retribution for His self-manifestation, but its reality in the universe can serve that end. [/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]6. That the elect will constitute a recreation of the race under a new Head is evident, while the retribute are but the branches cut off from the tree of humanity. Christ will be revealed as the Saviour of the world, though many are lost in the process. [/FONT]
[FONT=Book Antiqua, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- Finlayson[/FONT]​
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
There is no predestination but "double-predestination". Per Calvinism, the reprobrate CANNOT choose anything else. Therefore they cannot be BLAMED, because there was no way they could have AVOIDED their fate.

God either dynamically CREATES people FOR Hell, and CAUSES them to sin --- OR He is equally guilty of their sinfulness simply because of negligence, ignoring them to rot in what they could never avoid by themselves.

Of course --- the THIRD choice (and the only one that fits Scripture), is that everyone HAS a choice, therefore whoever goes to Hell has only themSELVES to blame. "God is just, and justifier of he who BELIEVES." The only way that works, is if belief was a CHOICE.

"You believe because you see? Blessed are those who HAVE NOT seen, and yet believe." How does this fit into "predestined-belief"? It doesn't.

"Not only do YOU refuse to enter (into belief), but those who WERE entering, you STOP!" Were-entering, means "were-being-saved". Stopped, means stopped. Try until the rivers run dry, until the winds cease to blow, until the sun burns out --- you can never fit that into "predestination"...
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Ben johnson said:
There is no predestination but "double-predestination". Per Calvinism, the reprobrate CANNOT choose anything else. Therefore they cannot be BLAMED, because there was no way they could have AVOIDED their fate.

God either dynamically CREATES people FOR Hell, and CAUSES them to sin --- OR He is equally guilty of their sinfulness simply because of negligence, ignoring them to rot in what they could never avoid by themselves.

Of course --- the THIRD choice (and the only one that fits Scripture), is that everyone HAS a choice, therefore whoever goes to Hell has only themSELVES to blame. "God is just, and justifier of he who BELIEVES." The only way that works, is if belief was a CHOICE.

"You believe because you see? Blessed are those who HAVE NOT seen, and yet believe." How does this fit into "predestined-belief"? It doesn't.

"Not only do YOU refuse to enter (into belief), but those who WERE entering, you STOP!" Were-entering, means "were-being-saved". Stopped, means stopped. Try until the rivers run dry, until the winds cease to blow, until the sun burns out --- you can never fit that into "predestination"...


more nonsense ben ..:yawn:


Reprobation is according to a permission to allow sin , you would have it that God cannot permit sin , that He was surprsied by the fall and that God didn't know who would die in sin before He created them!

it doesn't get any clearer than this , so if you want to traduce the Calvinist and his position you are doing it not from knowledge but from spite.
 
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Ben johnson said:
There is no predestination but "double-predestination". Per Calvinism, the reprobrate CANNOT choose anything else. Therefore they cannot be BLAMED, because there was no way they could have AVOIDED their fate.

By making that statement, you show clearly that you oppose Predestination as a biblical doctrine, and therefore you oppose God's own Word, which unequivocally teaches Predestination.

Ben said:
God either dynamically CREATES people FOR Hell, and CAUSES them to sin --- OR He is equally guilty of their sinfulness simply because of negligence, ignoring them to rot in what they could never avoid by themselves.

Of course --- the THIRD choice (and the only one that fits Scripture), is that everyone HAS a choice, therefore whoever goes to Hell has only themSELVES to blame. "God is just, and justifier of he who BELIEVES." The only way that works, is if belief was a CHOICE.


Maybe in Ben's little mind, but since he refuses to inform himself and learn what Reformed Theology ACTUALLY teaches, he can be forgiven for not "getting" it. Of course, all the non-Reformed believe that they had a hand in actuating their salvation, and believe that they have a free and unfettered choice for or against Christ, from the time they were born. God often allows people to live with that illusion for a time, but when they want to learn more, at some point, God will confront them with the Truth of their salvation, and their prior fallen condition, and they will come to believe the Reformed position, if they do not harden their hearts against it. If they do, God will leave them at the level, and they will be saved, but they will miss out on what God could show them if they were willing.

Ben said:
"You believe because you see? Blessed are those who HAVE NOT seen, and yet believe." How does this fit into "predestined-belief"? It doesn't.


No one said this verse teaches predestination, Ben. You're grasping at straws because this is referring to PHYSICAL SIGHT. This is NOT a verse about predestination, so it can't be used to refute it, any more than it can be used to teach it.

Context, Ben, context.

Ben said:
"Not only do YOU refuse to enter (into belief), but those who WERE entering, you STOP!" Were-entering, means "were-being-saved". Stopped, means stopped. Try until the rivers run dry, until the winds cease to blow, until the sun burns out --- you can never fit that into "predestination"...

Yada-yada-yada. Ben hates predestination. Ben can't stand it when it's taught. So Ben tries to refute it by any means possible, reading into verses meanings that aren't there so he can say, "can't fit into predestination, blah-blah-blah" . He brings up the subject even when it isn't being talked about. He drags out his entire false theory, and posts long-winded rambling posts at every turn, trying to make proselytes to his false theory. He mentions Calvinism at every opportunity to show his opposition to it, even when the topic has nothing to do with Calvinism or Calvinists.

Ben, most people who have been here for a while have you figured out, and most don't even bother to participate, because of the blowhard nature of your posts. You have been counseled over and over again to take the time to learn the truth about Reformed Theology and Calvinism, and you stubbornly and steadfastly refuse to do so, but would rather cling to the lies and falsehoods you hold about Calvinism, so that you can preserve your theory which you have invested time into and have become way too attached to, to the point where you refuse to be corrected about any point of it.
 
Upvote 0

Athanasian Creed

Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Solus Christus !!!
Aug 3, 2003
2,368
154
Toronto
Visit site
✟25,984.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
nobdysfool said:
...The hatred of Calvinism displayed here is truly astounding. ...

You should be happy the "hatred" is directed towards CalvinISM not CalvinISTS unlike other threads where non-Calvinists have been called all sorts of names up to and including heretical! :eek:

This is a case of "pot calling the kettle black"...pot, meet kettle!:doh:


Ray :wave:
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Athanasian Creed said:
You should be happy the "hatred" is directed towards CalvinISM not CalvinISTS unlike other threads where non-Calvinists have been called all sorts of names up to and including heretical! :eek:

This is a case of "pot calling the kettle black"...pot, meet kettle!:doh:


Ray :wave:

oh .... it must be just my imagination that John Calvin gets maligned at least once a Month on CF then ..........
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.