Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
1) It's actually anti-masonry if you are concerned about being factually correct. 2) Not at all. Cordially, Skip.morningstar2651 said:Ah, and naturally the anti-mason brigade shows up.
Still confused about the definition of the word "Cordially"?
Refer to my post #135 for your answer. Cordially, Skip.So show me that the Freemasons are stating these things in the 'context of salvation.'
4. Their prayer at the start of the EA degree is that the candidate will dedicate his life in the service of God, using what he learns in Masonry. In this, he is said to be joining in a partnership with God under Masonic auspices.
Yes, but any god will do. If you trust in Satan as your god, you have met the requirement.
Me, I think the spirit behind the ritual is demonic in nature.
Not if all but one of them is false. The God of the Bible is the only God; all others are false. A man can take a tree as his deity, but that doesn't make the tree God. Hope this clarifies things, assuming you were serious.smaneck said:You stated that "the Masonic deity make itself at home in such a temple." You also stated that Allah is not the same deity as God. The only way that is possible is if it there are multiple deities.
The version you use is immaterial, as the words as I described them maintain their meaning in any honest translation. Masons, by the way, generally use the KJV, and point to 3:16 as the source of their authority for the teaching. It remains true, as I've noted, that the verses Masons use to justify their 'spiritual temple' teaching are misidentified and misapplied in the process. The Church, collectively, is the Temple of God, not the individual believer.Uh, only KJV has 'ye' and I was reading a more modern translation.
Sounds like a personal problem on your part. But, be of good cheer, the truth never hides from the seeker.So far you haven't persuaded me that they are the ones doing the distorting.
I've stated my problems with Freemasonry quite clearly in this thread. If you read them, you'll find that inclusiveness was not mentioned as one of them.So your real problem is that Masons are too inclusive?
No criteria involved; merely pointing out exactly what Freemasonry teaches. It needs no further explanation.By your criteria Matthew 25 also supports salvation-by-works.
The comment makes sense in a church, or mosque for that matter. But you forget that Masons claim it's not a religion, only a fraternity of God-fearing men. Your question should have been: why would they be acting just like a religion that such a manner? And by what authority do they make such a claim?That way you say 'partnership with God' seems to be some sort of accusation. That sounds strange to my ears because the pastor of the church I used to attend was always talking about partnership with God.
Wrong question to ask. The real one is this: If a man chose Satan as his god, would that satisfy Masonry's requirement to believe in a Supreme Being?Masons on this list. Is it true you allow Satanists to join?
That the transforming force behind their ritual is demonic? My real issue is otherwise stated, and it focuses very much on Christians, and Masonry's destructive power in their lives.Ah, so that is your real issue.
Try considering the context all those comments fall into and you'll get the idea. Cordially, Skip.saw one phrase which spoke of purity and conduct.
Not if all but one of them is false. The God of the Bible is the only God; all others are false. A man can take a tree as his deity, but that doesn't make the tree God. Hope this clarifies things, assuming you were serious.
The Church, collectively, is the Temple of God, not the individual believer.
Verse 6:19 agrees with 3:16 in that once one accepts Gods' gift of eternal life, he receives the Holy Spirit within him, which makes him, as Paul notes, a temple of the Spirit. You will note that Paul differentiates between the Spirit and God in the same verse.
Sounds like a personal problem on your part. But, be of good cheer, the truth never hides from the seeker.
I've stated my problems with Freemasonry quite clearly in this thread. If you read them, you'll find that inclusiveness was not mentioned as one of them.
The comment makes sense in a church, or mosque for that matter. But you forget that Masons claim it's not a religion, only a fraternity of God-fearing men.
If a man chose Satan as his god, would that satisfy Masonry's requirement to believe in a Supreme Being?
The candidate must also pass muster with an examination committee, and it's my guess that not many Satanists would get their seal of approval.
My real issue is otherwise stated, and it focuses very much on Christians, and Masonry's destructive power in their lives.
Masons on this list. Is it true you allow Satanists to join?
Ah, so that is your real issue. Besides Masons being too inclusive you think the devil is behind it!
No religious test is required of a candidate, other than that he shall believe in God, the Creator and Governor of the Universe.
Do you believe in the existence of one supreme and everlasting God, in some revelation of His will, and in the immortality of the soul?
Do you believe in the existence of one ever-living and true God?
The above are requirements for membership in a Masonic lodge.
My interpretation of this would be a Satanist would not qualify. FYI this reply is for the non-professional poster and not the professional anti-mason. I do not reply to them.
Gee, what a surprise. Cordially, Skip.
Some GL's imply a monotheistic god, but that is the minority. Here are a few examples of GL requirements as to belief:The monotheistic requirement is interesting
Btw, Simpleman25 claims to be an Oklahoma Mason. Note that his GL states that that a man's faith is of no concern to Masons, but one of his lodges restricts membership to only Christians. More hypocrisy.Oklahoma: Do you believe in God? No atheist can be a Mason. Masons do not care what your individual faith is -- that is a question between you and your God -- but we do require that a that a man believe in a Supreme Being.
(The Iowa statement is that most commonly used among U.S. GL's.)Iowa: You must believe in a Supreme Being.
Kentucky: A belief in God.
South Carolina: a believer in the existence of a Supreme Being.
A review of such criteria reveals that there is no requirement for that supreme being to be monotheistic. Were GL's to demand such a thing would be considered an innovation. Too, it would prohibit Mormons from joining.Pennsylvania: The primary requirement of a Freemason is a belief in a Supreme Being, whether He be called God or Allah or Jehovah or any of the names by which the Supreme Architect of the Universe may be designated.
Where Masonic training manuals have addressed the subject, they conclude that no communist can be made a Mason due to its atheistic nature. Cordially, Skip.No restrictions against communists?
Feel free to post it here so the other readers can read it, or tell them where you posted it. After all, one other was interested in it. To my knowledge, you've never backed up the charge with facts.Simpleman25 said:He has been shown more than once the post I made concerning how he and his operators are indeed a cult obsessed with freemasonry.
Oh, I've answered your serious questions. I do admit to avoiding much of the nonsense you post, though I have made an exception in this instance. Cordially, Skip.As you can see I made numerous responses on a number of subjects only to have him disregard them.
Yet your brother, Simpleman25, belongs to a lodge that discriminates against non-Christians. Perhaps you should admonish him about that, privately, of course. Cordially, Skip.americanvet said:No religious test is required of a candidate, other than that he shall believe in God, the Creator and Governor of the Universe.
And now you know otherwise.smaneck said:It sounded very much to me like you thought they were taking a demon as God.
You take it wrong.I take it you don't believe in the Trinity.
It does no such thing. Paul differentiates between the actions of God and of the Holy Spirit. More to the point, if 6:19 supports the Masonic view that the individual is the Temple of God, that would make it contradictory to 3:16. Paul was a far more careful writer than to make an error like that. Bottom line remains: the Temple of God is the Church, made up of the body of believers. It is the Holy Spirit that is within us, a deposit, so to speak, guaranteeing what is to come.Verse 6:19 clearly indicates that the Temple here is the human body whereas you insisted it was the Church.
No, the real issue is Freemasonry's insistence that a non-Christian can be endowed with the spirit just as can a Christian. Thus, a Christian that supports Masonry's teaching is a hypocrite of the worst kind.But I'm guessing your real objection is with the idea that the bodies of non-Christians might also be Temples.
I wouldn't phrase it that way, as 'too inclusive' really doesn't capture the objections which I have articulated, nor does it carry any precision.So once again, it is a problem with the Masons being too inclusive.
It's a matter of degree. Do the Elks make statements such as Freemasonry makes about themselves? See my post #135.You do realize that most fraternities throughout history have had religious rituals? Doesn't make them separate religions.
They won't. They'll rephrase it many different ways, but they will not answer it as I pose it.Okay. Let's let the Masons answer that question.
I make no such conclusion, for reasons addressed elsewhere. My point remains: such rituals are approved by the GL's and their content, as with that of their training documentation, constitute the doctrine under which all Masons are subject, whether they like it or not. When Masonic doctrine claims that moral and mental purity are required for admission to heaven, the Christian must note the contradiction and act upon it. He must choose between the lessons of Masonry and those of his Lord and Savior.I think you assume that Masons who are Christians take those rituals as seriously as you do.
Matthew 25 concerns itself with Jesus' return, not salvation. John 3:16 and Ephesian 2:8-10 are the key verses that specify what one must do to be saved. Cordially, Skip.As for works-righteousness, you've yet to establish how anything in their rituals goes beyond what Jesus says in Matthew 25.
Yet your brother, Simpleman25, belongs to a lodge that discriminates against non-Christians. Perhaps you should admonish him about that, privately, of course. Cordially, Skip.
Some GL's imply a monotheistic god, but that is the minority. Here are a few examples of GL requirements as to belief:
Btw, Simpleman25 claims to be an Oklahoma Mason. Note that his GL states that that a man's faith is of no concern to Masons, but one of his lodges restricts membership to only Christians. More hypocrisy.
You take it wrong.
It does no such thing. Paul differentiates between the actions of God and of the Holy Spirit.
More to the point, if 6:19 supports the Masonic view that the individual is the Temple of God, that would make it contradictory to 3:16.
No, the real issue is Freemasonry's insistence that a non-Christian can be endowed with the spirit just as can a Christian.
Thus, a Christian that supports Masonry's teaching is a hypocrite of the worst kind.
I wouldn't phrase it that way, as 'too inclusive' really doesn't capture the objections which I have articulated, nor does it carry any precision.
Too, it's a matter of definition. Just how is 'religion' defined? And would Masonry meet that definition?
They won't.
Matthew 25 concerns itself with Jesus' return, not salvation.
John 3:16 and Ephesian 2:8-10 are the key verses that specify what one must do to be saved. Cordially, Skip.
He lives in a state that openly violates the Constitution by openly discriminating against Muslims by passing legislation against the Shariah.
Sounds like it is not just the Masons who are guilty of hypocrisy here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?