Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, it's not a bogus site. It's defining Godless evolution.
No it's not. The current laws of nature allows for no such supernatural view. That's why it's supernatural. Your 'yeah it could be we just don't know it yet' claim is completely worthless.
The laws of nature do not allow for nothing to create a universe from nothing.
No, it's not a bogus site. It's defining Godless evolution.
Wrong, it is a bogus site. They have a prejudice, and a misleading site name. They oppose the science of biology and do not support it. And the question was not about the made up word "evolutionism". It was about the "Godless form of evolution". You need to be able to show what that was with real words.
Funny how it is the same as Godless chemistry, Godless physics, and Godless thermodynamics. Why don't they just define science as evil and Godless, and be done with it?
What's wrong?Wrong,
The view is not supernatural and it does allow for it. Watch a Universe From Nothing. If you have any questions we can help you answer them. And your strawman argument is dishonest.
The fact that you do not understand something does not make it supernatural.
It all depends upon how you define "nothing". Your idea of "nothing" may not exist. Your idea of nothing may be supernatural and not real.
The real words were presented in the definition.
"Evolutionism is the atheistic worldview that says life developed without God and without purpose. Instead, we agree with Christians who adhere to Intelligent Design and Creationism that the God of the Bible created the universe and all life."
If you have a problem with Godless evolution meaning that life developed without God, you could actually point out where you disagree with the definition instead of responding with your typical meaningless dribble.
What's wrong?
Both passages?
Perhaps you could highlight in red?
No, I do not respond to dishonest sites. That is not dribble, your nonsense is dribble.
So why do you not have a problem with "godless gravity"? God may have been involved with evolution, if he exists. There is no evidence of any god's presence. The same applies to gravity. There is n evidence of god's mucking around with gravity so theories of gravity are "atheistic".
Try to respond with correct English. Remember how you were nitpicking last night, and how you lost terribly? Do not use made up words and answer the question.
The forum is about creation and evolution. Stick with that.
If you don't know what 'Godless form of evolution' means, then I don't think we can help you.Wrong, it is a bogus site. They have a prejudice, and a misleading site name. They oppose the science of biology and do not support it. And the question was not about the made up word "evolutionism". It was about the "Godless form of evolution". You need to be able to show what that was with real words.
You asked for a definition of Godless evolution. What part of the definition are you having a problem with?
You asked for a definition of Godless evolution. What part of the definition are you having a problem with?
If you don't know what 'Godless form of evolution' means, then I don't think we can help you.
The part where it defines all of science as being godless.
The forum is about creation and evolution. Stick with that.
How is it any different than a godless form of chemistry, a godless form of thermodynamics, or a godless form of particle physics?
You have made it about atheistic creationism, which you define as all of science.
If you don't know what 'Godless form of evolution' means, then I don't think we can help you.
Let's try "dysteleological evolution".
Does that help?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?