It's written on our hearts. The Holy Spirit works on us internally. The only good in us is Him.
You said his:
"The good news remains in all who call themselves Christians."
.. yet Jesus has said this:
Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
.. then I am not sure that just calling onesself Christian does necessarily qualify a person to have had the good news written on their hearts. Maybe they call themselves Christian because it is a fashionable thing to do. Do you know of a scripture that will support your idea? Or maybe your words are a bit inaccurate for what you mean, and you could rephrase it.
*Paul taught his compromised remixed gospel to the Pagan world who already had concepts of the sacrifice of a human/divine being for sin.
I am curious, can you please produce the statement St Paul made that you are referring to?
He didn't create it that way. They ate herbs. It was a result of the fall and inviting the devil in. In the new world the lamb will lay with the wolve again.
Is there scriptural evidence for this idea? Can you please provide the location for it? Thanks!
Looks like everything went according to God's plan. What you perceive as the works of man I see a God's sovereignty. There is not one thing that happens that He hadn't already preordained.
.. In saying this, do you think that in "preordaining" Jesus Christ's brutal execution, He desired it? If so, why, and if not, then who do you say desired it, and why?
They sinned within no time and they changed at once. Why is that so hard to believe? Lol even most Christians don't believe that but I do.
What does this mean "within no time" - does it mean they sinned before time began.. that time began after they sinned, or does it mean that not much time passed from the beginning of their life to the time when they sinned? How long is that extremely short amount of time? Are you suggesting seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, years? Is there scriptural support for this idea, and can you please show us that. Thanks again!
Someone he was not, apparently.
To some this is true, for example those He was addressing at the time. But to others He appears to be who He claimed to be. So what is the difference? Does He appear differently from different angles? Or do we bias our view of Him to see Him in a preconceived way?
I've found the tendency of people to anthropomorphize things to be quite fascinating.
I have too. I have also found the tendency for the opposite to be interesting: eg, that some people insist on "scientific proof" that animals feel pain.
Yeah, he didn't. Best offer is 'inspired', and opinions vary as to what that might mean, from vaguely giving someone the idea to write something, to dictating word for word. But the Bible does not use the word 'dictated', and therefore we are not obliged to believe it.
My own view is that any Christian bookshop you care to visit will give ample evidence that 'inspired by God' can result in work of mind-numbing mediocrity. Some diamonds; mostly dross. Why should Scripture be any different?
A songwriter is inspired by their muse too, FYI. You stopped short of that extreme.
"Common sense" would have us believing in a flat, immovable Earth and that the cosmos rotates around us.
Sure. So common sense isn't necessarily true, it is just a normal way to make sense. But the awareness of the existence of God is still common sense. Can you please explain your opposing view? Thanks!