Dinosaurs

[SkyWriting]

Fish have nostrils.

I'm not seein any breath in there. What are you imagining?

 

[RickG]

No. Your passage was not specific.
It used global, all encompassing terms.
You were wrong.

Only not specific in that not every creature was named. However, it is all inclusive of animals with flesh.

"And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female." (Genesus 6:19)
​

 

[Split Rock]

Those ferocious Velociraptors in Jurassic Park were closer to chicken size.
But that didn't make for good movie fun.

True, but meet Utah Raptor:

Utahraptor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[RickG]

I'm not seein any breath in there. What are you imagining?

Are you suggesting fish do not breath?

 

[Split Rock]

No. They cannot. The term is exactly
as you use it today. This Kind or that Kind.
It is a general, non specific term.

noun
1.
a class or group of individual objects, people, animals, etc., of the same nature or character,

or classified together because they have traits in common; category:
Our dog is the same kind as theirs.

2.
nature or character as determining likeness or difference between things:
These differ in degree rather than in kind.
3.
a person or thing as being of a particular character or class:
He is a strange kind of hero.

The phrase "after their own Kind"....means
"They are the children of their parents" or
"After their own KIN" Get it?

"After their own kin -folk."

Each according to their Kind.....Kin.....Kin-folk.

Offspring each from their parents.

According to their Kind.

Are you up to speed yet?

Funny then how its the professional creationists, like Gish, who claim a "kind" was some type of systematic group... ever heard of Baraminology?

 

[SkyWriting]

ICR

I challenge the validity that a species of anything has ever been named from only a single piece of one bone.

Not with facts you don't.

BBC - Earth - Is this a new species of human?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140610-animals-foxes-tibet-new-species-fossils-science/

Have fishermen discovered a new species of ancient MAN off coast of Taiwan? | Daily Mail Online

Dinosaur tooth found in Malaysia belonged to new species from Ornithischian order and is 140-million-year-old, says researcher

 

[AV1611VET]

Such a feat is not possible.

Matthew 19:26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

 

[SkyWriting]

Funny then how its the professional creationists, like Gish, who claim a "kind" was some type of systematic group...

That is the definition of Kind......some type of grouping.

 

[AV1611VET]

Was it the Irish Rovers? Oh, no. That was the unicorn.

Methinks the Irish Rovers didn't know their Bibles very well.

Unicorns were indeed aboard the Ark, as they are mentioned later in the books of Job and Psalms; not to mention Numbers and Deuteronomy.

 

[SkyWriting]

Are you suggesting fish do not breath?

What kind of drugs do you take for your disability?

Fish nostrils are not part of their breathing apparatus
- they are not connected to the fish's throat.

 

[RickG]

Matthew 19:26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

However, that scripture is not talking about the 40 days in the wilderness, is it? I can pull scripture out of context as well.

Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth
(2Kings 5:15)
​

 

[AV1611VET]

Matthew 19:26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

However, that scripture is not talking about the 40 days in the wilderness, is it?

No.

But it's an explanation as to how He endured 40 days w/o eating.

Let me make this clear again:

Jesus could have gone 100 days w/o either eating or drinking, if it was His will to do so.

 

[AV1611VET]

I can pull scripture out of context as well.

Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth
(2Kings 5:15)
​

2 Kings 5:15 And he returned to the man of God, he and all his company, and came, and stood before him: and he said, Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, but in Israel: now therefore, I pray thee, take a blessing of thy servant.

I believe what you did is called "quote mining," not "pulling Scripture out of context."

 

[RickG]

No.

But it's an explanation as to how He endured 40 days w/o eating.

Let me make this clear again:

Jesus could have gone 100 days w/o either eating or drinking, if it was His will to do so.

Nevertheless, he was fully human on earth. The only point I am suggesting is that the number 40 is not specific, rather a word to describe a period of time within context.

 

[RickG]

2 Kings 5:15 And he returned to the man of God, he and all his company, and came, and stood before him: and he said, Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, but in Israel: now therefore, I pray thee, take a blessing of thy servant.

I believe what you did is called "quote mining," not "pulling Scripture out of context."

What is the difference? Both have the same objective.

 

[AV1611VET]

Nevertheless, he was fully human on earth.

So?

He walked on water, didn't He?

Oh, wait ... you said "on earth."

Nevermind.

The only point I am suggesting is that the number 40 is not specific, rather a word to describe a period of time within context.

Ya ... I heard that tongues junk from Wrong's Concordance pertaining to "40" in the Hebrew.

Only this "40" is in Greek.

 

[AV1611VET]

What is the difference?

Ask Eve.

 

[RickG]

Only this "40" is in Greek.

I'm not questioning the translation, I'm questioning the context.

Example: I'm drinking a really "bad" cup of coffee right now. I bet it's been a thousand years since I had one like that.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

Those ferocious Velociraptors in Jurassic Park were closer to chicken size.
But that didn't make for good movie fun.

Are you quoting Mr Morris's creation research now? Gosh, the institute really is rigorous isn't it!

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm not questioning the translation, I'm questioning the context.

More like you're trying to sterilize jots & tittles.