DINOSAURS! Noah's Flood & other awesome questions.

[ElxDalto]

Your point? That only means we have more to learn and discover. There is no shame in not knowing.

But there is shame in acting like we do, which, we do. Evolution remember?

 

[SnowyMacie]

But there is shame in acting like we do, which, we do. Evolution remember?

What?

 

[Hieronymus]

It will always be pointless until you face up to what the real theory of evolution actually says and stop tilting at straw men.

You could also just admit you have no point or not reply at all.

Guys, i wish you all have a nice day and may God bless you.

 

[ElxDalto]

so if something dose seem out of place, that is why.

Thats an easy way of moving away from the evidence in my opinion.

 

[ElxDalto]

What?

Evolutionist believe they have the answer. Don't they?

 

[Speedwell]

Evolutionist believe they have the answer. Don't they?

Only to the material aspects of our existence.

 

[ElxDalto]

Only to the material aspects of our existence.

Exactly, and it's how you view the evidence with your mindset. If you're set on a certain view, you will bend the evidence towards it.

 

[ElxDalto]

Explain to me how a global flood lays down layers of sandstone.

Sandstone forms where sand is laid down and buried. It wasn't already sandstone.

 

[Hieronymus]

Sandstone forms where sand is laid down and buried. It wasn't already sandstone.

It's compressed dried mud basically.

 

[Speedwell]

Exactly, and it's how you view the evidence with your mindset. If you're set on a certain view, you will bend the evidence towards it.

So you think that limiting science to the material aspects of our existence is wrong? How is it to investigate God, the supernatural and our spiritual natures? How far do you go with this? Do you think limiting automotive engineering to the mechanical workings of engines is wrong, too?

 

[RickG]

Sandstone forms where sand is laid down and buried. It wasn't already sandstone.

Do you know that there are numerous types of sandstone, both of marine and terrestrial origin and they ways in which they are formed are well known, observed and understood?

How do you explain layers of shale and limestone?

 

[RickG]

It's compressed dried mud basically.

No its not.

 

[ElxDalto]

Lack of faith????? It's more like you find my courage to speak out about a stubborn religious institution which has stunted the growth of billions of Christians and turned off so many more children of God who might respond to the original gospel of Christ, you find that troubling to the delusions of Bronze Age speculations.

1 Corinthians 2:14
The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.


God gave us His word, why try and make His Word fit our false perceptions.

 

[ElxDalto]

So you think that limiting science to the material aspects of our existence is wrong? How is it to investigate God, the supernatural and our spiritual natures? How far do you go with this? Do you think limiting automotive engineering to the mechanical workings of engines is wrong, too?

What? No, I think we shouldn't twist the Word of God to fit what little we understand.

 

[Speedwell]

What? No, I think we shouldn't twist the Word of God to fit what little we understand.

OK, that's fair enough--for you, it's your interpretation of scripture which is at stake, not the Existence of God or His authorship of the universe.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

It's a naturalistic (i.e. Godless) model with a humongous platform and ambiguous evidence and many many gaps, which even evolutionists acknowledge. 'nuff said as far as i'm concerned.

The evidence is not ambiguous and the gaps are merely the fact of lack of an infinite number of fossils and the theory is not "godless" . . . any more than rocket science is "godless".

 

[ElxDalto]

Do you know that there are numerous types of sandstone, both of marine and terrestrial origin and they ways in which they are formed are well known, observed and understood?

How do you explain layers of shale and limestone?

Sedimentary rock... it was sediment, before it was rock.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

What? No, I think we shouldn't twist the Word of God to fit what little we understand.

So you're willing to let the word of God be wrong. An interesting choice.

 

[ElxDalto]

OK, that's fair enough--for you, it's your interpretation of scripture which is at stake, not the Existence of God or His authorship of the universe.

Oh you don't have to tell me.. of course it's not at stake, it's what scripture says.

 

[ElxDalto]

So you're willing to let the word of God be wrong. An interesting choice.

How is it wrong? Im not willing to accept man's word over God's.