Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I was thinking that exact same thing awhile ago. You really need to think faster, Nathan ---Cool -- then there were also plenty of apes aboard the ark, counting Noah and his family.
I was thinking that exact same thing awhile ago. You really need to think faster, Nathan ---
Well, it's easy for me to deny* --- you can't though. You guys paint yourselves into a corner. In saying the apes boarded, and claiming Noah and family were apes, you also have to admit that dinosaurs were aboard.Looking for a way to deny it, no doubt.
Well, it's easy for me to deny* --- you can't though. You guys paint yourselves into a corner. In saying the apes boarded, and claiming Noah and family were apes, you also have to admit that dinosaurs were aboard.
Ain't that a shame?
* God limited the animals to two-by-two-by-four/seven; whereas all of mankind was invited.
Were birds on the Ark?
Why are you asking us? We know there wasn't really any ark in the first place.Second time --- were birds on the Ark?
WEEEEEEEE! Satyrs were "Proto-dinosaurs!" Tell us... does that mean there were "proto-birds" on the ark?? Huh? Huh??I describe a Satyr as:
A) A pet theory of mine.B) Some kind of proto-dinosaur.
Why would any one tell you that, when there wasn't an ark in the first place?Indeed I do --- don't tell me there were no dinosaurs aboard the Ark.
One more time..... THERE WASN"T ANY ARK! However, if hypothetically speaking there was an ark, then there could not have been any non-avian dinosaurs on it. Does that answer your question? Or do you want to discuss unicorns now?Well, it's easy for me to deny* --- you can't though. You guys paint yourselves into a corner. In saying the apes boarded, and claiming Noah and family were apes, you also have to admit that dinosaurs were aboard.
Ain't that a shame?
* God limited the animals to two-by-two-by-four/seven; whereas all of mankind was invited.
And just why not? [Go ahead, give me a bunch of scientific nonsense in your reply, so I can pwn it. Bring up all the stuff you can, like oceans boiling, and the seaworthiness of the Ark, etc. I love shooting that stuff down.]However, if hypothetically speaking there was an ark, then there could not have been any non-avian dinosaurs on it.
The Chinese didn't come about until Genesis 10.Were people in China invited? Did Noah tell them about the coming Flood?
Genesis 10:17 said:And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
From what my history teacher tells me, the Chinese civilisation predated Noah. The Chinese civilisation is the world's oldest continuing civilisation. It didn't die off at any point in time which means they were unaffected by Noah's flood. Hehe. Probably they built the Great Wall to stop the flood from getting in. Hehe.
Besides, from pottery and images of the Chinese in their early civilisation, the Chinese people looked Chinese even then. No resemblance to Noah or the Jews, which means they couldn't have descended from Noah.
When we really study anything, be it history or world civilisation or science, fundamentalism does appear embarrassingly ignorant.
Maybe you guys ought to keep looking before you act like you know every cubic inch of this earth's interior; and quit giving cheap, myopic reports to one another - (and us). I'd love to see you guys' expressions when your archaeological spades dig up a worldwide, correlated flood layer. That would be a Kodak Moment extraordinnaire!Again excellent evidence that Triassic sediments are NOT flood deposits, and that YECs biblical flood ideas are completely wrong.
There's nothing like watching a scientist take a hike, is there? (Life's simple pleasures.)John Anderson strolling over ancient forest soils...
So are you saying that birds and dinosaurs were of the same "kind"?Well, it's easy for me to deny* --- you can't though. You guys paint yourselves into a corner. In saying the apes boarded, and claiming Noah and family were apes, you also have to admit that dinosaurs were aboard.
Ain't that a shame?
Really? Please quote the exact Bible verse that says that all of mankind was invited. I find it amusing the literalists try to justify the destruction of nearly all of mankind including children and babies by saying how evil all of mankind was and then turn around and claim that all of mankind was invited on the ark.God limited the animals to two-by-two-by-four/seven; whereas all of mankind was invited.
You find that Flood deposit first, hot-shot scientist, then we'll talk your nonsense. Until then, keep your dumb photo albums out of our theology.Now how about getting back to the point of the thread? Do you have any explanation for dinosaur footprints in supposed flood deposits or are you just going to continue to spout apologetics and play semantic games to try distract attention from yet another failure of young earth creationism to match reality?
Maybe you guys ought to keep looking before you act like you know every cubic inch of this earth's interior; and quit giving cheap, myopic reports to one another - (and us). I'd love to see you guys' expressions when your archaeological spades dig up a worldwide, correlated flood layer. That would be a Kodak Moment extraordinnaire!
You didn't understand him - these are the deposits some YECs claim were left by the Flood.You find that Flood deposit first, hot-shot scientist, then we'll talk your nonsense. Until then, keep your dumb photo albums out of our theology.
Nope, no plate tectonics anywhere.Nope, no biblical flood deposits anywhere.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?