There are two ways to look at it. Do we judge a religion based upon its teachings or based upon its followers? I find both to be valid, but it must be specified which we are doing.
It should be judged on its followers. christianity must be. How many times have I heard the tired christian trope, "Proof of God is a changed life." Well, changed, but not for the better obviously. Being a judgmental, hypocritical jerk is not something I need in my spirituality, thanks. Most christians act worse than non-christians, so what does that say about God and this "changed life" business?
I hope you aren't suggesting that those who follow Judaism should act like violent, bloodthirsty warmongers and that we have nothing in our faith that discourages those activities.
No, christians. Which I find ironic, since it's YOUR holy book, not ours. Most Jews I talk to seem to dance around the barbaric stuff in the bible. Not christians, no. They embrace it full on. I've heard more sermons justifying genocide than I have on being a good person, I kid you not.
You'd be surprised how many of his sayings are taken directly from the Tanakh or from rabbis that preceded him, so I agree.
Probably. Buddha said things similar too. Teaching love is a universal truth, not a christian one. But the christian bible says "God is love." So when you act contrary to that or when you promote 'God is violence' or' God is death,' then you have some problems in your religion.
Upvote
0