Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I disagree and so does scripture. Yeshua was perfect as far as the law is concerned. Why do you claim he wasn't able to keep all of the law's requirements?
While the law was in effect, Paul obeyed it. This does not say that he believed himself to be under that law currently.
And yet he goes on to say that this now-defunct law can justify no one because there is a new covenant for them to obey.
Paul took part so that he could preach the gospel.
Jesus nailed the law of Moses to the cross exactly as Paul said. What we are supposed to obey is Christ's law...
And why do you not advocate that we continue to sacrifice animals as is demanded by this same law?
13 In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
You continue to argue with Paul and the Holy Spirit. Enjoy yourself.
Yep, fulfilled at the cross
then the law changed:
Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
No, we are not under the law because we do not keep that old law. Keeping the law of Moses is not what Paul taught.
eshua was perfect as far as the law is concerned. Why do you claim he wasn't able to keep all of the law's requirements?
While the law was in effect, Paul obeyed it. This does not say that he believed himself to be under that law currently.
What translation are you using? Neither 'Eolohim' nor 'Yahweh' can be found in the New Testament.
And yet he goes on to say that this now-defunct law can justify no one because there is a new covenant for them to obey.
All of the prophecies were not fulfilled on the pale (cross). Neither heaven nor Earth have passed away.
Sin is the transgression of the law. We no longer need sacrifices to cover our sin. Yeshua is now our Kohen Gadol (High Priest).
Why didn't you post the verse? You have a habit of cherry picking, and reading verses out of context.
NO ONE can keep ALL...ALL...ALL of the law's requirements...not even Yeshua. This is fact. You say I am incorrect because you do not understand Torah.
You say Jesus kept the law perfectly... but there are commandments that are only for women... so he couldn’t “keep” those in the way you are thinking of “keeping” commandments.This is not a fact at all. Jesus kept the old law perfectly and it was part of his purpose that he do so. One, to show us that it was in fact possible for a man to do that, but because also it couldn't be fulfilled until someone did keep it perfectly. To bring in the new covenant he had to fulfill that law perfectly. He did that.
You say Jesus kept the law perfectly... but there are commandments that are only for women... so he couldn’t “keep” those in the way you are thinking of “keeping” commandments.
none of that says anything about followers of Messiah now being free to disobey God’s law.This is the law of the new covenant. He spoke differently about the old law:
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law- Galatians 3:13
the law entangles with the yoke of bondage- Galatians 5:1
if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law - Galatians 5:18
the strength of sin is the law- 1 Corinthians 15:56
ye also are become dead to the law - Romans 7:4
the law worketh wrath- Romans 4:15
we are not under the law- Romans 6:15
we are delivered from the law- Romans 7:6
we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter- Romans 7:6
There weren’t even animals to eat. It was a vision.He wasn't told to eat gentiles. "Peter; kill, and eat"
And nothing forbidding it either.
Paul took a vow to prove that he lived in obedience to the law of God(aka the law of Moses)Which we know was not because he was trying to obey the Torah but to keep to what the Holy Spirit had directed him to do. He taught that the old law was abolished. You can't use this in an attempt to nullify his teaching on that. Shame on you for using the scriptures against themselves.
You make Paul out to be a lawless flip flopped.1Co 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1Co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1Co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
1Co 9:22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.
1Co 9:23 And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.
Naturally Paul went to Jewish feasts so he could share the gospel with them. He went to synagogues for the same reason. He wanted to gain them who were under the law. Paul taught to not be under the law.
Gal_5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
You make Paul out to be a lawless flip flopped.
Paul never taught disobedience to the law of God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?