Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
@HARK! another scripture to consider... Peter’s vision.
Peter told God “I’ve never eaten anything common or unclean”. He didn’t say “I’ve never eaten any animal”...
This would indicate that he had indeed eaten meat.
Not according to the link that I posted. Do you have a more reliable source?It is the last meal (literally a last supper) before the fast of the firstborn from sunrise to sunset on the 14th.
No, it is only regarding gentiles...
There is no mention of them all having a pig roast...
Nope. It either was a Passover meal or it was not a Passover meal.
You cannot argue that it was conducted in a way that a Passover meal is conducted, except that it was substantially different and omitted a number of elements that are part of a Passover meal.
Not only did none of the verses that were suggested earlier in this thread indicate that, but neither does the one you cited here.Scripture says it was a Passover meal.
It takes more than the word "Passover" appearing in any verse for it to indicate to us that the meal the Lord and his Apostles actually ate was a Passover meal.
No, it is only regarding gentiles...
"You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean"
There is no mention of them all having a pig roast...
Not according to the link that I posted. Do you have a more reliable source?
Except we know that after this, Peter ate "unclean" animals because he took the lesson to heart (mostly) as also we should. The old law was abolished and Christ not only purifies us but he nailed the old law to the cross.
Scripture says it was a Passover meal.
Mar_14:12 And the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover, his disciples said unto him, Where wilt thou that we go and prepare that thou mayest eat the passover?
I don't see any evidence that anything was missing.
He wasn't told to eat gentiles. "Peter; kill, and eat"
And nothing forbidding it either.
Anything that has a backbone is considered as meat in the Orthodox Church, and we know that Jesus cooked fish for His disciples. John 21:9-12This short video provides some evidence to support that possibility. I have been researching this subject; and I have found much more evidence than this video presents. Some of the arguments that I have reviewed are weak; but even the weak arguments, could be valid arguments. I have found some flawed evidence in this video; but so far, as I have seen this evidence is only flawed by semantics. Again, this video is just a brief overview of this subject. I'm left torn between observing the Moedim according to the tradition of the Torah, or from following the message of the Prophets, Yahshua, and his disciples. I look forward to those in this community who are interested in seeking out the truth in this matter.
Anything that has a backbone is considered as meat in the Orthodox Church, and we know that Jesus cooked fish for His disciples. John 21:9-12
I'm sure that nothing will convince you, but the argument that they had to have observed a Passover meal although the evidence is that they did not do so cannot not hold up to scrutiny.That is quite incorrect. Killing the Passover and eating the Passover the first day of unleavened bread proves it was the Passover meal.
Seriously?Scripture?
Seriously?
Galatians 2
14 But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?
Earlier he says that Peter ate with the Gentiles. He ate with these formerly unclean people and their unclean food categorized as such under the old law.
And what did Paul understand about the old law? That it was dead.
Colossians 2
11 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. 13 And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, 14 having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. 15 Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it.
As he also explains in Hebrews, going back to the law also means sacrificing animals for sin remission and that is actually an insult against Jesus who made the ultimate sacrifice "once for all."
You can't go back to the law of Moses and just satisfy some of its requirements. You would theoretically have to obey ALL of its requirements. Though after AD 70 it is impossible to obey that law since there is no more a Levitical priesthood and there isn't a temple for offering those sacrifices.
I don't know here you get this stuff from! It is so twisted I don't know where to start! BTW, Torah was kept AFTER the destruction of the first Temple so your theory is moot. No one, not even Yeshua, can keep or obey ALL its requirements. You are just showing me that you have a complete misunderstanding of scripture and Torah...
What was against us was the CURSE of the Law, through Yeshua, THAT was what was taken away.
You have ONE link regarding ONE instance. They are also done for other feasts like Yom Kippur.
Erev (Night Of) Yom Kippur | My Jewish Learning
The Torah was not kept after Christ.
King James Version
But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again unto you, if God will. And he sailed from Ephesus.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?