Byfaithalone1
The gospel is Jesus Christ!
If you took time to read your Bible or at least believe your Bible you would know these things.
There is a way to disagree without being combative.
BFA
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you took time to read your Bible or at least believe your Bible you would know these things.
There is a way to disagree without being combative.
BFA
Jesus is Lord of all the commandments but that does not mean He breaks them.
Stormy emphasized John 5:17; I would also emphasize verse 18:
John 5:16 For this reason the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because He was doing these things on the Sabbath.That verse clearly states that Jesus was "breaking the Sabbath," as well as "making Himself equal with God." However, paradoxically, He did not sin by doing so; He compared His work to that of the priests in the temple, who likewise broke the Sabbath yet were held blameless for it:
17 But He answered them, "My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working."
18 For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.
Matthew 12:1 At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples became hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat.Sacrifices were commanded on the Sabbath, so the priests were required by law to work in the temple on the Sabbath. Jesus said that they were profaning the Sabbath but that they were not guilty of sinning by doing so. Their work of offering sacrifices in the temple (as dictated by the law) was greater than the prohibition against working on the Sabbath (also as dictated by the law). That "ceremonial" work trumped even a requirement of what Adventists call "the moral law," which calls into question whether Sabbath observance really is a universal moral commandment.
2 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said to Him, "Look, Your disciples do what is not lawful to do on a Sabbath."
3 But He said to them, "Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions,
4 how he entered the house of God, and they ate the consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone?
5 "Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent?
6 "But I say to you that something greater than the temple is here.
7 "But if you had known what this means, 'I DESIRE COMPASSION, AND NOT A SACRIFICE,' you would not have condemned the innocent.
8 "For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath."
Jesus went out of His way to work on the Sabbath in order to reveal His authority over what had been created—including the law and the Sabbath—and His equality with the Father. Jesus was performing the true priestly work that all of the law foreshadowed. He is greater than the priests, greater than the temple, greater than the law, and greater than the Sabbath. God does not observe the seventh-day Sabbath; He is always working.
BFA, you are right, but its cool, actually its funny because the assumption is so far from the truth.... I am 50, was born and raised in adventist culture, baptized at 9, attended sda schools, studied theology, etc... so you do the math.... if anything I am quite familiar with its adventism.... in fact I remember adventist life prior to the 28 fundamentals.....LOL
The problem was not with what Jesus was doing, but rather, how the religious Jews interpreted it. What Jesus was doing was not a violation of the fourth commandment under the New Covenant nor was it a violation under the Old Covenant even though the Jews said it was. Jesus brought them back to the Old Covenant to correct them, which tells us these things were not a violation back then either. The religious Jews also thought it was a sin to eat with unwashed hands. Remember, Jesus' ministry was also to correct, magnify and restore honor to the Law.
Remember, Jesus' ministry was also to correct, magnify and restore honor to the Law.
What Jesus said is that He came to fulfill the law, to fill its obligations full.
BFA
One thing that I have found with people pushing false doctrines or wrong beliefs is that they use one or maybe two verses or statements to prove their position as they overlook many verses that refute their position.
It becomes very frustrating when people have blinders on in order to see only what they want to see so long as it fits within their little box.
If you did not feel vulnerable, you probably would not feel frustrated. The motive force of your frustration is your fear. That's OK - we all experience the same thing in different ways to different degrees.It becomes very frustrating when people have blinders on in order to see only what they want to see so long as it fits within their little box.
God is ALWAYS working..... now run tell that....Jesus went out of His way to work on the Sabbath in order to reveal His authority over what had been created—including the law and the Sabbath—and His equality with the Father. Jesus was performing the true priestly work that all of the law foreshadowed. He is greater than the priests, greater than the temple, greater than the law, and greater than the Sabbath. God does not observe the seventh-day Sabbath; He is always working.
Sophia made this comment which sums up the issue emphasis mine: God is ALWAYS working..... now run tell that....
Good point. I've found something similar. Often, it involves a person ripping one verse out of the surrounding context and then comparing that verse with other unrelated passages -- passages that the person would prefer to focus on. This approach doesn't really lead to any real understanding of an individual passage because the person hasn't paused to consider all that has been said in the context of that passage. This approach is often supported under the umbrella of "here a little, there a little."
It's really amazing what a person can learn when s/he moves away from his/her SS Quarterly and its pre-scripted questions and proof texts and begins to explore entire books in their full context. There are many insights that can be gained that the person may have never before seen.
I agree. Paul refers to this as being "under the veil." He confirms that the law is the cause of this condition.
BFA
Were you frustrated with my earlier one statement question too?