Only none of those things listed were ever presented in a symbolic context but instead were presented as things that actually existed and still exist; angels being among that which still exist.
Only none of those things listed were ever presented in a symbolic context but instead were presented as things that actually existed and still exist; angels being among that which still exist.
Only none?
Angels exist---half breeds never did and still don't.
You keep insisting that was never and is still not the case, but you have yet to prove that from the actual passage dealing with that subject itself.
The scriptures themselves call them MEN!! MEN OF RENOWN-----which means, mean of high reputation and authority---not half breeds of any kind!! They are not at anytime ever called anything else!! So to believe otherwise is going against the written word!
he scriptures themselves call them MEN!! MEN OF RENOWN
So they were not called Nephilim?
Numbers 13:33 We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them."
Should we change this to "MEN!! MEN OF RENOWN"?
Sex is much more than just the sexual act. Sex and spirit are closely related descriptions of Truth just like Food, shelter, and clothing are related to Spirit.
The scriptures themselves call them MEN!! MEN OF RENOWN-----which means, mean of high reputation and authority---not half breeds of any kind!! They are not at anytime ever called anything else!! So to believe otherwise is going against the written word!
But these weren't just any men. These were men who possessed abilities and attributes that empowered them to earn renown and heroic status so-called and they inherited those abilities and attributes from that which was NOT human.
Numbers 13:33 We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them."
Should we change this to "MEN!! MEN OF RENOWN"?
You read it right. None of those things mentioned are presented as being figurative. Only literal.
Where does it say that the children of Anak were half angel?? Yes, MEN OF RENOWN!! Yes, they were very well know for they were giants. Just as the Masai are all very well known in Africa and even throughout the world for their height---nothing to do with fallen angels any more than dwarfism is! It is genetics! The children of Anak lived in an area where genetics harbored a group of very tall people---and that also was in their land---a pocket of what was once---even their produce was huge, and the land certainly has nothing to do with human DNA. This area was somehow protected from some of the decay that occurred after the fall. Even today--huge produce is grown in areas---esp. Alaska---look it up.
Weren't these all direct descendants of Noah ...
Deaut 9:1 Hear, Israel: You are now about to cross the Jordan to go in and dispossess nations greater and stronger than you, with large cities that have walls up to the sky. 2 The people are strong and tall—Anakites! You know about them and have heard it said: “Who can stand up against the Anakites?” 3 But be assured today that the Lord your God is the one who goes across ahead of you like a devouring fire. He will destroy them; he will subdue them before you. And you will drive them out and annihilate them quickly, as the Lord has promised you.
Giants are symbolism
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?