• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did Abraham observe the Sabbath day?

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,377
Dallas
✟1,087,745.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
They were doing two days of gathering, much different than just eating food, which is allowed on the Sabbath. The equivalent would be grocery shopping on Friday (the Preparation day) to eat on the Sabbath. The disciples were just picking the grains and eating what they picked, not harvesting.
The Israelites were only allowed to pick up what they could eat each day. They weren’t allowed to gather more than what they could eat in a single day except on Friday when they were told to gather a double portion.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The Israelites were only allowed to pick up what they could eat each day. They weren’t allowed to gather more than what they could eat in a single day except on Friday when they were told to gather a double portion.
Yes, agreed. They were gathering two days worth of food on the Friday so they could eat on the Sabbath. Eating on the Sabbath is not a sin, just like its not a sin to pick an apple off a tree to eat or pick the heads of grain to eat, which is much different than gathering a full days' worth of food or harvesting.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,210
2,590
✟265,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
The Israelites were only allowed to pick up what they could eat each day. They weren’t allowed to gather more than what they could eat in a single day except on Friday when they were told to gather a double portion.
It depends on what Sabbath. If it was the 15th, the firstday of unleavened bread, None was to eaten or harvested until The first ripe sheaf had been brought to the priest first. Then eating and harvest could begin.

Festival sabbath the first day of unleavened bread...

Lev 23:11 And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.
12 And ye shall offer that day when ye wave the sheaf an he lamb without blemish of the first year for a burnt offering unto the LORD.
13 And the meat offering thereof shall be two tenth deals of fine flour mingled with oil, an offering made by fire unto the LORD for a sweet savour: and the drink offering thereof shall be of wine, the fourth part of an hin.
14 And ye shall eat neither bread, nor parched corn, nor green ears, until the selfsame day that ye have brought an offering unto your God: it shall be a statute for ever
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BNR32FAN
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It depends on what Sabbath. If it was the 15th, the firstday of unleavened bread, None was to eaten or harvested until The first ripe sheaf had been brought to the priest first. Then eating and harvest could begin.

Festival sabbath the first day of unleavened bread...

Lev 23:11 And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.
12 And ye shall offer that day when ye wave the sheaf an he lamb without blemish of the first year for a burnt offering unto the LORD.
13 And the meat offering thereof shall be two tenth deals of fine flour mingled with oil, an offering made by fire unto the LORD for a sweet savour: and the drink offering thereof shall be of wine, the fourth part of an hin.
14 And ye shall eat neither bread, nor parched corn, nor green ears, until the selfsame day that ye have brought an offering unto your God: it shall be a statute for ever
The reference to the disciples eating was on the weekly Sabbath commandment, not the annual sabbath(s) feast days.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,210
2,590
✟265,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
The reference to the disciples eating was on the weekly Sabbath commandment, not the annual sabbath(s) feast days.
Luke 6:1 And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands.

This 2nd Sabbath after the first concerned them eating the grain in the fields. It could have been any one of those Sabbaths. Even the second week ie Sabbath of the weeks.

There were actually seven Sabbaths. Each, bringing the firstripe/s throughout the weeks as each species ripened.

Le 23:15 And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete:
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Luke 6:1 And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands.

This 2nd Sabbath after the first concerned them eating the grain in the fields. It could have been any one of those Sabbaths. Even the second week ie Sabbath of the weeks.

There were actually seven Sabbaths. Each, bringing the firstripe/s throughout the weeks as each species ripened.

Le 23:15 And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete:
Second Sabbath of the month, this is not about the annual sabbath(s) feast days, there is no picking the heads of grain and eating on the sabbath(s) feast day ordinances, this is not about making sacrifices or offerings, this is the disciples eating on the Sabbath day, which is not a sin.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,210
2,590
✟265,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Second Sabbath of the month, this is not about the annual sabbath(s) feast days, there is no picking the heads of grain and eating on the sabbath(s) feast day ordinances, this is not about making sacrifices, this is the disciples eating on the Sabbath day, which is not a sin.
It was the second Sabbath after the first of the harvest season obviously. We disagree again
Good day
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It was the second Sabbath after the first of the harvest season obviously. We disagree again
Good day
They were not harvesting grains or were they making any grain offerings, they were hungry and eating the heads of the grain on the Sabbath, while walking with Jesus, which is not a sin.

Matthew 12:1 At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat

Mark 2:23 Now it happened that He went through the grainfields on the Sabbath; and as they went His disciples began to pluck the heads of grain

There is no sin to eat on the Sabbath day, the broke the law of the Pharisees, not the law of God because the Pharisees were adding to the commandments of God and we are told not to add to the commandments or take away from them. Deut 4:2
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobRyan
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,377
Dallas
✟1,087,745.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, agreed. They were gathering two days worth of food on the Friday so they could eat on the Sabbath. Eating on the Sabbath is not a sin, just like its not a sin to pick an apple off a tree to eat or pick the heads of grain to eat, which is much different than gathering a full days' worth of food or harvesting.
What I get from the context of Jesus’ words is that what they were doing was against the commandment. Notice how His reply is to mention David entering the temple and eating the consecrated bread which He specifically points out that it was not lawful for him to eat”.Jesus doesn’t quote scripture to support that what His disciples were doing was lawful, instead He quotes scripture about how what David did was unlawful but God showed mercy on him and those who were accompanying him because they were hungry. Furthermore the usage of His statement “you would not have condemned the innocent. For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath” seems to be an indication that because He is Lord over the Sabbath He is able to show compassion and pardon them.

“But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions, how he entered the house of God, and they ate the consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone? Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent? But I say to you that something greater than the temple is here. But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire compassion, and not a sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent. For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.””
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭12‬:‭3‬-‭8‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

Jesus makes no defense in any way implying that they weren’t breaking the Sabbath commandment, on the contrary He was using David and the priests as an example of others who had broken the same commandment whom He showed mercy towards. In a manner of speaking it appears that Jesus was basically telling the Pharisees “have a heart, show some compassion”.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,210
2,590
✟265,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
They were not harvesting grains or were they making any grain offerings, they were hungry and eating the heads of the grain on the Sabbath,
Each week, sabbath they brought the ripened grain until pentecost. The grain was ripe enough to eat, but still standing in the fields. Nobody was to eat until it was first brought to the priests in the temple. You can ignore and deny it was the harvest season all you want.
Good day
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,210
2,590
✟265,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
What I get from the context of Jesus’ words is that what they were doing was against the commandment. Notice how His reply is to mention David entering the temple and eating the consecrated bread which He specifically points out that it was not lawful for him to eat”.Jesus doesn’t quote scripture to support that what His disciples were doing was lawful, instead He quotes scripture about how what David did was unlawful but God showed mercy on him and those who were accompanying him because they were hungry. Furthermore the usage of His statement “you would not have condemned the innocent. For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath” seems to be an indication that because He is Lord over the Sabbath He is able to show compassion and pardon them.

“But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions, how he entered the house of God, and they ate the consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone? Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent? But I say to you that something greater than the temple is here. But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire compassion, and not a sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent. For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.””
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭12‬:‭3‬-‭8‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

Jesus makes no defense in any way implying that they weren’t breaking the Sabbath commandment, on the contrary He was using David and the priests as an example of others who had broken the same commandment whom He showed mercy towards. In a manner of speaking it appears that Jesus was basically telling the Pharisees “have a heart, show some compassion”.
what you say corresponds to this...............

Deut 18:3 And this shall be the priest’s due from the people, from them that offer a sacrifice, whether it be ox or sheep; and they shall give unto the priest the shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw.
4 The firstfruit also of thy corn, of thy wine, and of thine oil, and the first of the fleece of thy sheep, shalt thou give him.
5 For the LORD thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes, to stand to minister in the name of the LORD, him and his sons for ever.

6 And if a Levite come from any of thy gates out of all Israel, where he sojourned, and come with all the desire of his mind unto the place which the LORD shall choose;
7 Then he shall minister in the name of the LORD his God, as all his brethren the Levites do, which stand there before the LORD.
8 They shall have like portions to eat, beside that which cometh of the sale of his patrimony.

The ministry of the priesthood was to bear the peoples sins, for forgiveness, and bless them offer incense (prayers) before him.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,377
Dallas
✟1,087,745.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
what you say corresponds to this...............

Deut 18:3 And this shall be the priest’s due from the people, from them that offer a sacrifice, whether it be ox or sheep; and they shall give unto the priest the shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw.
4 The firstfruit also of thy corn, of thy wine, and of thine oil, and the first of the fleece of thy sheep, shalt thou give him.
5 For the LORD thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes, to stand to minister in the name of the LORD, him and his sons for ever.

6 And if a Levite come from any of thy gates out of all Israel, where he sojourned, and come with all the desire of his mind unto the place which the LORD shall choose;
7 Then he shall minister in the name of the LORD his God, as all his brethren the Levites do, which stand there before the LORD.
8 They shall have like portions to eat, beside that which cometh of the sale of his patrimony.

The ministry of the priesthood was to bear the peoples sins, for forgiveness, and bless them offer incense (prayers) before him.
Yes but my point is, I don’t see Jesus defending their innocence, I see Him acknowledging their guilt and urging the Pharisees to show some compassion.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Each week, sabbath they brought the ripened grain until pentecost.
Pentecost wasn't each week, it is one of the annual festivals.
The grain was ripe enough to eat, but still standing in the fields. Nobody was to eat until it was first brought to the priests in the temple. You can ignore and deny it was the harvest season all you want.
Good day
Thats not what the scripture says the disciples were doing, they were eating the grain because they were hungry Matt 12:1 not gathering, harvesting or making sin offerings. You’re reading into the scripture.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Yes but my point is, I don’t see Jesus defending their innocence, I see Him acknowledging their guilt and urging the Pharisees to show some compassion.
There was nothing to defend. Jesus is not bending the rules for His disciples that makes Him a hypocrite. There’s no sin in eating on the Sabbath, these were the Pharisees laws not the law of God.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,377
Dallas
✟1,087,745.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There was nothing to defend. Jesus is not bending the rules for His disciples that makes Him a hypocrite. There’s no sin in eating on the Sabbath, these were the Pharisees laws not the law of God.
You miss the whole point of the passage. So please explain why Jesus’ reply was to mention David and the priests who were guilty of breaking God’s commandments when they were hungry.

It’s like this, the Pharisees accused the disciples of breaking God’s commandments. Jesus replies, David and the priests broke God’s commandments and yet you don’t condemn them. His argument was that the Pharisees would overlook the matter of David and the priests breaking God’s commandments so why not these men for breaking His commandments for the same reason of being hungry.

And I should point out that Jesus wasn’t being a hypocrite because He wasn’t picking grain on the Sabbath, His disciples were.
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,132
4,647
Eretz
✟377,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Actually, he said (in Mark 2:27) that "the sabbath was made for MAN", not Adam. Of course, that was in the context of the Pharisees accusing him and his disciples of breaking the sabbath law. (The same story with slightly different details is in Matthew 12 and Luke 6) Adam is not actually mentioned anywhere in the four gospels. (Except in Luke's genealogy) Paul mentions him several times in his letters, but never in context with the sabbath.
Adam in Hebrew. Same difference. He did not say the Sabbath was made for JEWS. So Yeshua was speaking regarding creation. Adam was made on the 6th day and Shabbat on the 7th.
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,132
4,647
Eretz
✟377,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Just can't give an inch huh? You responded to my post and what I said. My point was not the same as yours. Enough said.
Why would I when you try and take the mile? You are wrong...enough said.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You miss the whole point of the passage.
Not really, I don't think I am the one missing the point.
So please explain why Jesus’ reply was to mention David and the priests who were guilty of breaking God’s commandments when they were hungry.
First of all, please quote the scripture that says it is against the commandment of God to eat on the Sabbath. The law being referred to is the law of the Pharisees, they added many laws to God's commandment and Jesus was correcting them, not bending the rules.

David ate the showbread on the Sabbath when he was running for his life and was hungry. David ate the bread and there is nothing in the Sabbath commandment about not eating on the Sabbath. Here is the Sabbath commandment for your reference.

Exodus 20:8 “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. 11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.

Please point out in the commandment of God where eating is prohibited on the Sabbath day.

It’s like this, the Pharisees accused the disciples of breaking God’s commandments. Jesus replies, David and the priests broke God’s commandments and yet you don’t condemn them.
Lets quote the scripture...

Matthew 12:1 At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. 2 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath!”
3 But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: 4 how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? 5 Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are blameless?

Which law is Jesus referring to, not one of the Ten Commandments as there is no such law in God's commandments that one cannot eat on the Sabbath day. This is the law of the Pharisees.

Just like it is not a sin for priest to do the work of God on the Sabbath day, this is not secular work and the Sabbath is meant to honor God by doing His ways Isaiah 58:13 Jesus was comparing eating on the Sabbath to priests working on the Sabbath, neither is a sin or against the commandment of God.


His argument was that the Pharisees would overlook the matter of David and the priests breaking God’s commandments so why not these men for breaking His commandments for the same reason of being hungry.
It's not the commandment of God that was broken. The Pharisees accused Jesus of breaking the Sabbath, they accused Jesus that God was not His Father, they accused His disciples of breaking the Sabbath, it seems like you have sided with the Pharisees over the very Words of Jesus.

Jesus said He kept His Fathers commandments, which includes the Sabbath commandment John 15:10 Luke 4:16 and never sinned.....so you trust the words of the Pharisees who accused Jesus and His disciples of sinning, when they were not, eating is allowed on the Sabbath.
Sin is the transgression of God’s law 1 John 3:4 and Paul quotes right from the Ten Commandments to define sin Romans 7:7 if you break one of these commandments you break them all James 2:10-12 Jesus is not okay with His disciples sinning and condemning others for it.
And I should point out that Jesus wasn’t being a hypocrite because He wasn’t picking grain on the Sabbath, His disciples were.
No, saying Jesus bended the rules for His disciples is making Jesus a hypocrite because Jesus condemned the Pharisees for keeping their rules over the commandments of God. Matthew 15:3-9 so allowing His disciples to bend the rules is in essence making Jesus a hypocrite which is one of the saddest teachings by some churches, they would rather make Jesus out to be a hypocrite or sinner than keep one of His commandments. This makes the apostles hypocrites as they teach over and over to keep the commandments of God and the Sabbath is a commandment of God, that they kept every Sabbath Acts 13:42, Acts 13:44, Acts 18:4 and says what matters is keeping the commandments of God 1 Cor 7:19.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,377
Dallas
✟1,087,745.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
First of all, please quote the scripture that says it is against the commandment of God to eat on the Sabbath. The law being referred to is the law of the Pharisees, they added many laws to God's commandment and Jesus was correcting them, not bending the rules.
Quote where Jesus corrected them. He doesn’t say this was not what was commanded. The case He made against them was that both David and the priests broke God’s commandments because they were hungry and the Pharisees didn’t condemn their actions. The Pharisees held both David and the Levitican priests in high regard and didn’t refer to them as unrighteous or ungodly because of this transgression. Yet they condemned the actions of Jesus’ disciples as an offense against Jesus Himself, because they were His followers and their actions reflect on Him personally. Jesus didn’t say that David and the priest’s actions were lawful, He said they were unlawful.

““You shall work six days, but on the seventh day you shall rest; even during plowing time and harvest you shall rest.”
‭‭Exodus‬ ‭34‬:‭21‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

Harvesting was considered work according to God’s commandment.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,410
5,513
USA
✟704,337.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Quote where Jesus corrected them. He doesn’t say this was not what was commanded. The case He made against them was that both David and the priests broke God’s commandments because they were hungry and the Pharisees didn’t condemn their actions. The Pharisees held both David and the Levitican priests in high regard and didn’t refer to them as unrighteous or ungodly because of this transgression. Yet they condemned the actions of Jesus’ disciples as an offense against Jesus Himself, because they were His followers and their actions reflect on Him personally. Jesus didn’t say that David and the priest’s actions were lawful, He said they were unlawful.

““You shall work six days, but on the seventh day you shall rest; even during plowing time and harvest you shall rest.”
‭‭Exodus‬ ‭34‬:‭21‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

Harvesting was considered work according to God’s commandment.
They were not harvesting wheat, please show where the disciples were harvesting wheat. They were picking the heads of grain and eating them while walking with Jesus because they were hungry Matthew 12:1 and please show where that is breaking the commandment of God to eat on the Sabbath? It would be hypocritical for the disciples to tell us to keep the commandments of God, but not keep them themselves and for Jesus to condemn people for not keeping the commandments of God but yet bend the rules for His disciples. Sorry this is what you are getting from these scriptures, it’s wrong it is recording the side of the Pharisees, not what was happening as Jesus explains. Jesus would know how to properly keep the Sabbath which is why He was contrasting priest who are doing God’s work with David eating on the Sabbath, neither are sins. The Sabbath is made to be a blessing for mankind Isaiah 58:13 Mark 2:27 and eating on the Sabbath when hungry is not breaking any of the commandments of God.

What law that was unlawful was the man-made law of the Pharisees, which is not the same as the commandments of God, the same law that crucified Jesus who in His own words said He did not sin. John 8:46-47 and Jesus said those who did not believe Him are not of God and you want to side with the Pharasees, have you thought this through? The Pharisees added many man-made laws to the commandments and we cannot add to or subtract from God’s perfect commandments Deut 4:2. The Pharisees wanted to add to them, now everyone wants to take away from them, both are equally as bad.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0