ShirChadash
A Jew, by the grace and love of God. Come home!
SC - Messianic Judaism has been used for many, many years in this context - it is certainly not a new name. By the same token you may well claim it has been borrowed, in its root form, directly from Judaism. Now, that may well be true but there is no copyright on the name. I think, in all honesty, that for someone to think that a Messianic Jew is a part of 'normal' Judiasm, as such, in this day and age is pushing the imagination a little far.
The same arguments were put forward in relation to Reform Judaism, as I recall, that they should not use that title because, in the eyes of many orthodox Jews, they simply were not 'real' Jews any longer in the normal, accepted use of the word. Therefore they should not use the word Jew or its derivatives in their title. They won the day, ultimately, though there was not (and is not, still) universal acceptance by other Jews.
As said above, it will be necessary to find a new name at some point that takes in those who might call themselves Messianic Jews and Messianic Gentiles, but I think the movement itself must be free to choose the name it wishes to use; it will not be an overnight process but a more long term gradual realisation that the existing title does not fit any longer. The new title will need to incorporate something that joins both the Jewish and 'Christian' aspects of the movement - your suggested name does not really do that. Therein lies a part of the problem - but is not just about Jews!
none of that addresses the issue of why anyone would object to the use of the word messiahist as compared to messianic, or of the term messiahism versus messianism (as you used in your title -- others would use the word messianicism).
I realize you have a particular issue you are concerned with, and you are posting out of that view -- that of finding a term that is inclusive of everyone within the messiahist movement itself. That is not at all relevant to my concern nor interest, much less my place to even discuss.
My concern is rather opposite -- I, on the other hand, am concerned with the appropriating messiahism has done, of the term messianic, as an exclusive term which by nature necessarily at best overlooks, and at worst can be taken to negate or deny the fact that huge numbers of people who do not follow your strain of xianity are also messianic believers.
Judaism ITSELF IS messianic. It would be like me starting a new "Judaism" and my group calling our religion "HaShem-following Judaism". Our right? Sure, it would be our "right". But silly? Yes, absolutely. Why? Because it would be an exercise in attempting to distinguish ourselves by stating that we are exactly what every other form of Judaism is. LOL And it would also, by construct, be an insinuation that the other branches of Judaism are NOT HaShem-following in our eyes. Hello? Are any of you understanding, yet?
Upvote
0