DMS1972 my translation said “Jesus looked at the man with love” so think Jesus loved him anyway. But Jesus loves everyone. Not everyone is saved though. My biggest fear is if I disobey God in a single area of my life will it cost me heaven?
Hi abovetheclouds, That's a good point. This meeting is recorded by both Matthew, Mark and Luke and Luke records how Jesus looked at the rich young ruler, with love in his countenance.
I can't tell anyone what Jesus wants them to do. If we only have very scant awareness of the teaching of Jesus on the Kingdom then its going to be difficult for us to hear what he is saying in our particular circumstance.
Also we might be conditioned a little by others to think only in terms of doing this and doing that.
I think its interesting because I heard this taught in a christianity explored course and we got round to talking about this. What they said was it was about 'authenticity' - but as I thought about it later I couldn't help notice the difference between the way Jesus responds to this enquirer and the way he responds to the Pharisees with only a few exceptions. I didn't quite accept the answer that the record of the meeting is to do with 'authenticity', or the young mans lack of it - that's too vague.
God's word does promise mercy. Lamentations 3:22 It also tells us what is impossible with man, is possible with God.
There was a whole different attitude in the rich young man of course, the Pharisees came with trick, or nonsense questions quite often, he came with a genuine interest, he clearly believed Jesus could give him an answer. He wasn't trying to catch Jesus out with a difficult question.
As I understand this Jesus answered the man according to his position religious and otherwise. He knew the commandments so Jesus answered him at first according to the best the young man knew, as he did with the Pharisees and Saducees.
Remember Jesus taught the multitude and I don't believe that he ordered his teaching hapzardly or that it was recorded in a muddled way.
Since its inner character that is important I think if we went back to our old lifestyle having been redeemed from it then that would be a turning back.
The christian life is a
pilgrimage but not to places on earth - people can go to those if they want, but how much closer are you to heaven if you go to these? Don't get me wrong there may be value in visiting some of these places, but I think that one can if not careful then end up thinking the journey ends there.
I'm not a calvinist, or not any longer. I am not against Calvin, some of his thoughts commentary are helpful - I just no longer go for that whole system, because of the way its filtered down over the last four centuries, and because it does seem to have been somewhat infected by the spirit of the age in France.
Eternal Life as far as christian living on earth is concerned means
Life with God in Christ (given the meaning content the Bible would give to that). It's a
walk. After we die it will no longer be possible to turn back. If you turn back and it doesn't bother you then you never really were a christian. Commiting suicide would be a form of turning back, despairing of God and life - whereas despair of ones own ability to save oneself can take a person on to Faith.
Presumption and despair are two sins for the christian to be wary of.
Josef Pieper wrote a book on Hope, called "On Hope", I find him helpful.
Question that I have on this also : did the believers in Acts sell
everything? - they certainly shared with other believers if they had genuine need from what I read?
I help at a community garden (open to christians and non-christians) and take some stuff of my own (books, tools) and leave it there for others to use at the Garden, I can also use the things myself there - that's one way I think Jesus wants me to serve Him at the moment.