- Oct 23, 2003
- 16,711
- 1,132
- 54
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
Wonder if he ever killed anything else before this. Bet David would stand no chance against, say... a bear? Or say...a lion? Nope, wouldn't stand a chance against those either.
God helped him with his weapon of choice. If he took a piece of paper, don't know if that would have killed him, or a bear, or a lion, but you're free to believe it would have.
Maybe he could have used a butterfly? But he didn't, still used a proven weapon of choice and God still blessed him. But imagine if he did, what would we think when we heard the term butterfly effect?
God helped him with his weapon of choice. If he took a piece of paper, don't know if that would have killed him, or a bear, or a lion, but you're free to believe it would have.
Maybe he could have used a butterfly? But he didn't, still used a proven weapon of choice and God still blessed him. But imagine if he did, what would we think when we heard the term butterfly effect?
You're acting like it was a foregone conclusion that David slinging a stone at Goliath would ensure his victory. The Bible says differently.
Goliath laughed at David approaching him with a sling and a stone. The king and his brothers thought David was nuts for approaching Goliath with just a sling and a stone. Why do you suppose that was? Maybe because, to borrow a saying from my pastor, anyone with one eye and half sense knows that a young boy with just a sling and a stone stands no chance in the natural against a giant. But God was with him.
That really is the point of this story. Even though David stood no chance against Goliath in his own strength and power, as he went "...in the name of the Lord Almighty..." he was able to defeat the giant. David defeated the giant not because of his own ability or strength, but because God was with him.
![]()
Upvote
0