Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now a simple look at this thread.
People who say they own a weapon - Simply Put
People who say they do not own a weapon - Alithis, SpiritPsalmist and Messy
People who posted, but never said whether they own a weapon or not.
Optimax
Svt4Him
SouthBound
Boidae
Brinny
RDKirk
Frogster
Steve Petersen
Catherineanne
Ajax777
Katerinah
Alderbaren
de1929
Not one mentioned if they even owned a weapon - not one. So I'll ask you to substantiate your claim. To whom is the bolded accusation addressing and what proof do you have of the accuracy of the accusation.
If you can substantiate the accusation, then it may be harsh, but accurate. If the accusation cannot be substantiated then not only is it harsh, but could most likely be a false accusation against a Brother or Sister in Christ.
I find the above testimony to be suspect (hey, if we're going to play court on an Internet forum with strangers, might as well do it with gusto), because I've posted in this thread and my name doesn't appear anywhere on either list. But FTR, I do not own a weapon.
He was speaking of the Sword of the Spirit obviouslyDid you not read the entire post?
Why did Jesus command his followers to purchase swords?
We can't pick and choose which verses to give consideration to view and which verses to ignore because they fly in the face of a belief.
We have to have the WHOLE council of the Word of God and the Divine wisdom to follow His leading. Even if it bothers our doctrines
He was speaking of the Sword of the Spirit obviously
Now a simple look at this thread.
People who say they own a weapon - Simply Put
People who say they do not own a weapon - Alithis, SpiritPsalmist and Messy and the ever present probinson doesn't have one either
People who posted, but never said whether they own a weapon or not.
Optimax
Svt4Him
SouthBound
Boidae
Brinny
RDKirk
Frogster
Steve Petersen
Catherineanne
Ajax777
Katerinah
Alderbaren
de1929
Not one mentioned if they even owned a weapon - not one. So I'll ask you to substantiate your claim. To whom is the bolded accusation addressing and what proof do you have of the accuracy of the accusation.
If you can substantiate the accusation, then it may be harsh, but accurate. If the accusation cannot be substantiated then not only is it harsh, but could most likely be a false accusation against a Brother or Sister in Christ.
What exactly was your point again?
I stated it already in the post you referred to. You are welcome to scroll back and re-read it
David had weapons, and if they had guns back then he would have used em..
Lol its not an acusation of or at any one.Now a simple look at this thread.
People who say they own a weapon - Simply Put
People who say they do not own a weapon - Alithis, SpiritPsalmist and Messy and the ever present probinson doesn't have one either
People who posted, but never said whether they own a weapon or not.
Optimax
Svt4Him
SouthBound
Boidae
Brinny
RDKirk
Frogster
Steve Petersen
Catherineanne
Ajax777
Katerinah
Alderbaren
de1929
Not one mentioned if they even owned a weapon - not one. So I'll ask you to substantiate your claim. To whom is the bolded accusation addressing and what proof do you have of the accuracy of the accusation.
If you can substantiate the accusation, then it may be harsh, but accurate. If the accusation cannot be substantiated then not only is it harsh, but could most likely be a false accusation against a Brother or Sister in Christ.
where it says David slew thousands, was not about the Goliath story, he cut people up with a weapon, commonly known as a sword! If he had an AR, he would have used it, and AR is an assault rifle!Can you just imagine little David walking up to Goliath with a gun? The story would be so utterly meaningless. We'd all be talking about gangsta David popping a cap in Golitath's noggin...
David was outmatched in every way physically but still killed Goliath with a sling and a stone. How? Because God, not a gun, was with him. Even though he was physically incapable of defeating Goliath in the natural, God was with him and made the impossible possible.
where it says David slew thousands, was not about the Goliath story, he cut people up with a weapon, commonly known as a sword! If he had an AR, he would have used it, and AR is an assault rifle!
well, he probably slew more than Rambo.Well I suppose if you want to envision David as a Biblical Rambo, that's your prerogative.
Can you just imagine little David walking up to Goliath with a gun? The story would be so utterly meaningless. We'd all be talking about gangsta David popping a cap in Golitath's noggin...
David was outmatched in every way physically but still killed Goliath with a sling and a stone. How? Because God, not a gun, was with him. Even though he was physically incapable of defeating Goliath in the natural, God was with him and made the impossible possible.
where it says David slew thousands, was not about the Goliath story, he cut people up with a weapon, commonly known as a sword! If he had an AR, he would have used it, and AR is an assault rifle!
David was a warrior.Some guy stood and killed so many his hand was locked onto the sword then some other guy defended a lentils field. Don't see him asking God if he should use a sword for lentils, and IMO lentils are evil, so saving them serves no purpose.
well, he probably slew more than Rambo.
Point being he had a weapon, used em, and would have , loved an AR!
Abe did some killings too!Some guy stood and killed so many his hand was locked onto the sword then some other guy defended a lentils field. Don't see him asking God if he should use a sword for lentils, and IMO lentils are evil, so saving them serves no purpose.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?