Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
in case you didn't notice...Many creationists will simply try to say God used a similar blueprint for neanderthals compared too humans, thus explaining the 90-something percent similarity.
Its not my view however. For all i know, God could have used evolution, or he could have not.
but according to the bible...they are "mankind"Humans are homo sapiens (also known as modern humans)
Homo sapiens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Though sometimes the word "human" can also refer to creatures that existed before the rise of homosapiens
(Archaic humans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
but are still apart of our same genus.
(Homo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )
Why would somebody inspired by the holy spirit not be historically/scientifically accurate? the writers of the bible were inspired by the holy spirit.
but according to the bible...they are "mankind"
The argument that neanderthals are a different species from humans is not valid, because it goes against what the bible says.
They are human. Most humans today descended from them. They make up about 3-4% of non-African ancestry.
their skeletons looking totally different from human skeletons?
and a misrepresentation ,i saw this guy with skin on in a park drinking whiskey.he was japanese and a bit bowleggedThere skeletons are not completely different, there are many similarities, and some differences.
from
Neanderthal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not really. Non-creationists say that in the beginning there was this inorganic singularity, and that after it exploded at the Big Bang, there was all this inorganic matter & energy from which all life sprang. Rocks spawning life is as likely as watches spawning other watches.That comparison comes up short though because you're trying to apply an organic process to inorganic objects.
Are you a skeletal forensics expert?and a misrepresentation ,i saw this guy with skin on in a park drinking whiskey.he was japanese and a bit bowlegged
Where is the oft ridiculed "rocks spawning life" claim actually made in the scientific literature, please?Not really. Non-creationists say that in the beginning there was this inorganic singularity, and that after it exploded at the Big Bang, there was all this inorganic matter & energy from which all life sprang. Rocks spawning life is as likely as watches spawning other watches.
I am not familiar with the scientific literature. What other conclusion can be drawn, though? If there was a Big Bang which resulted in all of the matter in the universe; and if some of this matter eventually coalesced into earth; and if life on earth began from this matter; then it follows that life sprang from the inorganic matter that existed in the pre-Big-Bang singularity. Or, reducing the many billions of years down by a factor of 1000, you have rocks spawning life. Does the scientific literature have an explanation of how life got started?Where is the oft ridiculed "rocks spawning life" claim actually made in the scientific literature, please?
Do you think familiarising yourself with it before making claims about it would be an idea?I am not familiar with the scientific literature.
How much do you know about organic chemistry?What other conclusion can be drawn, though?
Um... no, that's not how it works. It seems you don't actually understand what the term organic means in a scientific context. Seriously, rocks aren't involved at all.If there was a Big Bang which resulted in all of the matter in the universe; and if some of this matter eventually coalesced into earth; and if life on earth began from this matter; then it follows that life sprang from the inorganic matter that existed in the pre-Big-Bang singularity. Or, reducing the many billions of years down by a factor of 1000, you have rocks spawning life. Does the scientific literature have an explanation of how life got started?
mans infintisimal blind reasoning vs God...
you choose ,i Chose God.
let God be true....
Not really. Non-creationists say that in the beginning there was this inorganic singularity, and that after it exploded at the Big Bang, there was all this inorganic matter & energy from which all life sprang. Rocks spawning life is as likely as watches spawning other watches.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?