- May 19, 2018
- 11,802
- 12,530
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Why argue about gravity? Its here and thats all that matters! Flat earth is 'NOT' here, so argue about that!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nice try. If you deny that there is a force pulling objects toward each other you are denying gravity. That is exactly what the poster is doing - denying the apparent force but lacking an alternative explanation for the effect.What are you even talking about??? Nobody is denying gravity.
We're saying NOBODY knows where it comes from or what it is.
Einstein's garbage time space theory is garbage theoretical nonsense that has nothing to do with science. It should belong in the non-fiction nonsense section.
For arguments sake, if one did believe what it says about the earth being created on day 1 and the planets on day 4, why would such a person ever presume the earth is just another planet?
Where does it say the planets were created on day 4? I'd say you're choosing to infer something that isn't there.For arguments sake, if one did believe what it says about the earth being created on day 1 and the planets on day 4, why would such a person ever presume the earth is just another planet?
But that is just a lens effect... or atmospheric refraction... or CGI...Obviously the Weather Channel didn't get the memo from the conspirators.
Why didn't you take a screen shot of this bit?
View attachment 248602
'Sunlight Starry Night' is simply displaying a fundamental ignorance of physical principles, and appears unabashed by it.It's not just FES that denies gravity. In this thread, read from post 82 onwards. It's weird.
Can? So it's entirely possible that there's no distortion? Hmmm, that's tricky, eh?Anyone knows when a camera is attached to a rising balloon the fluctuation in the balloon when it is rising can cause distortion in the camera.
Anyone knows when a camera is attached to a rising balloon the fluctuation in the balloon when it is rising can cause distortion in the camera.
But when the balloon has stopped rising and is resting right before the burst, for a good 15 seconds on the video is seen a flat stationary earth.
Anyone knows when a camera is attached to a rising balloon the fluctuation in the balloon when it is rising can cause distortion in the camera.
Can? So it's entirely possible that there's no distortion? Hmmm, that's tricky, eh?
I cant decide whether your post is admirable for the effort on display or ridiculous for continuing to engage in this absurd game theyre playing.Ah, OK. So, looking at your flat Earth posts on Christian Forums, you've posted a fair number on the subject, and refused to debate several times on account of past ridicule, which is fair enough; but to refuse to post your links to detailed analysis by qualified contributors because of past ridicule is odd, because any ridicule would be aimed at those analyses, not you.
However, although you've said things like, "I've discussed the science in great detail. ... There are past threads to peruse should one feel so inclined." and you've claimed that you've provided links to papers by qualified mathematicians, physicists, or engineers that provide a full mathematical treatment of flat Earth theory, "on numerous occasions on past threads", the site search facility doesn't turn up a single post you've made that discusses the science 'in great detail', or that contains relevant links to anything more than so-called 'primer' videos.
Given that you claimed to be "not convinced of a flat earth" in April 2017, and were still "shape agnostic" in July of last year, and that the links you claim to have posted would clearly be convincing, one would have expected to find those posts sometime after April 2017... but no - and not before that date either.
My evidence suggests that you haven't "discussed the science in great detail" in these forums, nor have you posted links to papers by qualified mathematicians, physicists, or engineers that provide a full mathematical treatment of flat Earth theory "on numerous occasions on past threads". However, it's still possible that I somehow missed all those "numerous occasions", or that the search facility did not reveal them.
You're welcome to show that you have done what you claim, and prove me wrong while doing so.
Why argue about gravity? Its here and thats all that matters! Flat earth is 'NOT' here, so argue about that!
Lol! both? BS is expected, but arrogant BS is just rude - so I had a bit of search practice; after all, he might once have posted a useful link... but as far as I can see, it's complete BS.I cant decide whether your post is admirable for the effort on display or ridiculous for continuing to engage in this absurd game theyre playing.
Science is difficult, and makes disconcerting claims; if you don't have a decent science grounding, it can feel exclusive and elitist. Rejecting it in favour of provocative pseudoscience and reversing the burden of proof takes back control of the narrative.FE believers are a select group of people i think. I think they are pulled in to believe any conspiracy theory that raises its head. They dismiss science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?