Pretty lame. By the way folks notice how the disinformation operation has is deliberately stigmatizing the word "truth": truthers, troofers, truther logic etc. Think about that. We are being conditioned to now think truth is a bad thing. Anyone else notice that?
If you'll remember, you recently said something to the effect of, 'If we're 9/11 Truthers, doesn't that make them 9/11 Liars?'. Remember that?
The whole point of the quote above is that putting 'Truth' in the moniker is just a cheap theatrical trick, as if the mere word has any bearing on the truth of your beliefs. I'm poking fun at the idea, because it's about as relevant as petitions of who-believes-what. It's not a devaluation of
truth itself, but pointing out that simply inserting the word in the title of your movement doesn't mean its beliefs are true in the slightest, or even that your camp places a higher value on truth. I seem to remember pictures of beams cut during cleanup being posted as if they were thermite cuts from the 'Truth Movement', so there you go.
ManFromUncle said:
Barry Jennings said quote "I was stepping over bodies. You know when you are stepping over bodies."
Jennings says in the interview you post that his words were "taken out of context." He latches onto "I never said I saw" dead bodies. This is a difference without a distinction. This is from the well-known BBC hit piece on 911 questioners.
'Without a distinction'. Go into a court of law and see if saying you think there were dead bodies beneath your closed eyes is not distinct from
seeing dead bodies. If you want to say that Barry Jennings is lying about Dylan Avery abusing his story for Dylan's own agenda, then go right ahead. Even when someone denies the spin that Truthers put on their words, Truthers just re-label them as part of the conspiracy, or imply that sinister forces 'got to them', which is what's being implied here. Your beliefs appear to be unfalsifiable in that regard, which is a bad sign.
Not a single dead body was recovered from WTC7. If you have evidence to the contrary, please present it.
ManFromUncle said:
Why would a frightened Barry Jennings call Avery asking him to pull the footage, and reverse his position about the bodies (not the explosions)? Why would the PI hired by Avery to investigate Jennings' death refer the case to law enforcement before refunding Avery's money and telling him "never contact me again"?
Regarding the first claim, we have Barry's own words that he didn't like the way Dylan and Co. were hijacking his story for their own benefit. Regarding the second claim (about the P.I.), we don't know that it happened at all...it comes only from the mouth of Dylan Avery, whose first film 'Loose Change' is full of bogus claims, which he later was forced to admit. If you want to believe Dylan, that's your right...but don't expect me to take his story as true when there's no way to verify it. Even if I did believe the story, he doesn't elaborate on
why the P.I. said to never call him again...you expect us to believe it's because the P.I. was scared, and (if it happened at all) it may be that the P.I. thought Dylan is a first-class scumbag.
Btodd
