Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I am among those who currently understand that the 70th week begins about the time of Jesus' baptism. Why do you think that it is erroneous?

Thanks
Hi Christian 1724,

7 weeks and 62 weeks unto messiah. "unto messiah" is the big issue.

Since the the 70 weeks are determined upon Daniel's people and Jerusalem, my reasoning is not according the start of Jesus's ministry, but upon Jesus's arrival in Jerusalem... hailed as the King of Israel coming in the name of the Lord.

In Luke 19:41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it,

42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.

43 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,

44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

4 days after arriving in Jerusalem, hailed as the messiah by his followers, Jesus was cutoff, crucified. Which completed the 69 weeks.

Jesus arrived in the 69th week and when cutoff completed the 69 weeks.

Leaving the 70th week still unfulfilled.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

christian1724

Active Member
Oct 8, 2021
32
31
64
Texas
✟21,630.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I see. And thanks for the response.

I was also confronted by that verse (Daniel 9:26) at one time. Yet the next verse (Dan 9:27) seemed to fit Jesus' covenant, ministry, and final sacrifice so well that it was difficult to put aside the 3 1/2 year ministry of Jesus as being not included. I'm not locked in on this viewpoint but it seems to fit Daniel's message better in light of what is now the history of Jesus and His ministry.

On a slightly side note: "Mat 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." seems to speak to Daniel 9.27.

(and this is my blood) And He shall confirm (of the new testament) the covenant (which is shed for many) with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the (for the remission of sins. But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.)sacrifice and the oblation to cease.

Dan 9.26 (in the KJV) says "And after threescore and two weeks". Since it does not say "at the end of ..." then it may be that there is no deadline at the end of the 69th week. So when you look up the word, it can be legitimately translated "after(ward)" which would place the cutting off of the Messiah afterward into the 70th week.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
So when you look up the word, it can be legitimately translated "after(ward)" which would place the cutting off of the Messiah afterward into the 70th week.
My thinking is into gap between the 69th week fulfilled by the messiah's arrival and the 70th week beginning. 4 days from His arrival, to being cutoff would be 4 days into the gap. Which would meet the requirement of "after" 69 weeks (7wks + 62 weeks), messiah cutoff.

Here is a chart I made of the Daniel 9. To the right, the a.o.d setup 1335 days before Jesus's return (based on Daniel 12:12).




upload_2021-10-16_16-28-39.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,319
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,960.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Hello All

I know another really long post but read it you will not be sorry I promise it will make you go wait a minute!!!

I think before you can get into the weeks of years it would help to know what the heck Daniel is actually talking about and what his understanding of all this was. So lets get some perspective.

Dan 9:[2] in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, perceived in the books the number of years which, according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah the prophet, must pass before the end of the desolations of Jerusalem, namely, seventy years.

That is what Daniel is considering here when will the punishment be over the punishment he tells is

Dan 9:[11] All Israel has transgressed thy law and turned aside, refusing to obey thy voice. And the curse and oath which are written in the law of Moses the servant of God have been poured out upon us, because we have sinned against him.

So what is the curse of the covenant Daniel is talking about in Verse 11

Well Actually Lev 25 and 26 lays it all out doesn't it. The Blessings and the curse of the covenant.

Lev 25:[2] "Say to the people of Israel, When you come into the land which I give you, the land shall keep a sabbath to the LORD. [3] Six years you shall sow your field, and six years you shall prune your vineyard, and gather in its fruits; [4] but in the seventh year there shall be a sabbath of solemn rest for the land, a sabbath to the LORD; you shall not sow your field or prune your vineyard.

This is the main rule that we are dealing with here.

Lev 26: [1]"You shall make for yourselves no idols and erect no graven image or pillar, and you shall not set up a figured stone in your land, to bow down to them; for I am the LORD your God.[2] You shall keep my sabbaths and reverence my sanctuary: I am the LORD.[3]"If you walk in my statutes and observe my commandments and do them,[4] then I will give you your rains in their season, and the land shall yield its increase, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit.[5] And your threshing shall last to the time of vintage, and the vintage shall last to the time for sowing; and you shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land securely.[6] And I will give peace in the land, and you shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid; and I will remove evil beasts from the land, and the sword shall not go through your land.[7] And you shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.[8] Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall chase ten thousand; and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.[9] And I will have regard for you and make you fruitful and multiply you, and will confirm my covenant with you.[10] And you shall eat old store long kept, and you shall clear out the old to make way for the new.[11] And I will make my abode among you, and my soul shall not abhor you.[12] And I will walk among you, and will be your God, and you shall be my people.

That is the blessing part.

So from Daniel's perspective this is exactly what has just happened. We need to remember Daniel is a Priest and they lived and breathed the books of Moses. So they violated the Covenant as clearly laid out by Jeremiah and so The Curse of the Covenant as clearly laid out in Leviticus is poured out upon them as Daniel so quaintly puts it.

Lev 26 [14]"But if you will not hearken to me, and will not do all these commandments,[15] if you spurn my statutes, and if your soul abhors my ordinances, so that you will not do all my commandments, but break my covenant,[16] I will do this to you: I will appoint over you sudden terror, consumption, and fever that waste the eyes and cause life to pine away. And you shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it;[17] I will set my face against you, and you shall be smitten before your enemies; those who hate you shall rule over you, and you shall flee when none pursues you.

Even Stating this

"Then the land shall enjoy its sabbaths as long as it lies desolate, while you are in your enemies' land; then the land shall rest, and enjoy its sabbaths. [35] As long as it lies desolate it shall have rest, the rest which it had not in your sabbaths when you dwelt upon it.

So now we have established what scripture says the 70 years are for. We know why it was 70 years. We know that 70 Sabbath years were missed during the Years from Saul to the Babylonian Captivity.

So first the Israelite's are dragged away then the Jews and the Land will lie desolate for 70 years and have the rest it missed while they were on it.

So the next question is what about when they are in captivity does the curse stop when they are dragged away or are they still under the rules of the covenant even in captivity........................ and the answer is yes they are still under the covenant.

SO what now what if they repent

"But if they confess their iniquity and the iniquity of their fathers in their treachery which they committed against me, and also in walking contrary to me,[41] so that I walked contrary to them and brought them into the land of their enemies; if then their uncircumcised heart is humbled and they make amends for their iniquity; [42] then I will remember my covenant with Jacob, and I will remember my covenant with Isaac and my covenant with Abraham, and I will remember the land.

Ok So God will return them to their Glory and remember the Covenant.

SO ....did they repent while they were in captivity?..........Well we know they did not.... all worshiped the statue except three men we are told this in Dan 3: Daniel confirms this

Dan 9 [13] As it is written in the law of Moses, all this calamity has come upon us, yet we have not entreated the favor of the LORD our God, turning from our iniquities and giving heed to thy truth.

So what happens in the curse of the covenant if they do not repent?

Lev 26:[23]"And if by this discipline you are not turned to me, but walk contrary to me,[24] then I also will walk contrary to you, and I myself will smite you sevenfold for your sins.

So they will be punished seven times or sevenfold for their refusal to repent.

So Daniel prays, confesses they have violated the covenant and asked to be told when will the seventy years of punishment be over and when will the Israelite iniquity be healed. And make no mistake the Covenant calls it their iniquity.

[39] And those of you that are left shall pine away in your enemies' lands because of their iniquity; and also because of the iniquities of their fathers they shall pine away like them. [40] "But if they confess their iniquity and the iniquity of their fathers in their treachery which they committed against me, and also in walking contrary to me, [41] so that I walked contrary to them and brought them into the land of their enemies; if then their uncircumcised heart is humbled and they make amends for their iniquity;

So it is very clear this is all about the Hebrews Sins, the Hebrews iniquity that Daniel is asking for answers on.

So Daniel asks the question and the answer comes back...

[24]"Seventy weeks of years are decreed concerning your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place.

The answer is not what he wanted to hear. They have not repented so Seven Times more for their sins as they are still under the curse of the covenant and if they do not repent God will increase the punishment by seven times.

So 70 years times 7 = 490 years

Now we see that the 490 years is not a random number it is what is laid out in the very curse of the Covenant Daniel speaks of in this chapter.

Notice it is concerning your people to put an end to THEIR SIN TO ATONE FOR THEIR INIQUITY all exactly as laid out in the curse of the covenant Daniel speaks of

Dan 9:[11] All Israel has transgressed thy law and turned aside, refusing to obey thy voice. And the curse and oath which are written in the law of Moses the servant of God have been poured out upon us, because we have sinned against him.

It is not about Jesus dying on the cross and ending sin to atone for mankind's iniquity as some doctrines of men teach. It is about exactly what it says it is about Their iniquity their sins their violation of the covenant and their punishment for it.

The reality is only after the 490 years can the Promise to Abraham Issac and Jacob be fulfilled and not one day sooner because they are still being punished for the whole 490 years.

This prophecy starts with the decree of Cyrus as stated by Daniel himself in verse one and ends 490 years later with the end of the Priest king line in 47 BC. After that then can the promise to Abraham be fulfilled.

This prophecy has nothing to do with Jesus the anti christ or any thing else that has been added to it after 120 AD.

Use common sense ask yourself this question, if this prophecy actually names the very year Jesus was born then why did not Jesus and the Apostles directly refer to it over and over as proof Jesus was the Messiah. They refer to dozens and dozens of other scriptures but just leave out the one prophecy that supposedly names the exact year of Jesus's birth. Please that is just plain nonsense. They would have quoted it over and over as the most compelling proof of Jesus being the Messiah. Why didn't the Pharisees tell Herod the exact year Jesus was to be born why all the mystery. Apparently only the wise men knew the Messiah was born because of some star!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But the very people who read and studied the word of God day after day were what....Just to stupid to be able to add?????? Really ...Seriously.

The earliest Church Fathers knew the truth of this prophecy its time you did too.
2000 years later and the curse has still not been lifted from Israel.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,319
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,960.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I see. And thanks for the response.

I was also confronted by that verse (Daniel 9:26) at one time. Yet the next verse (Dan 9:27) seemed to fit Jesus' covenant, ministry, and final sacrifice so well that it was difficult to put aside the 3 1/2 year ministry of Jesus as being not included. I'm not locked in on this viewpoint but it seems to fit Daniel's message better in light of what is now the history of Jesus and His ministry.

On a slightly side note: "Mat 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." seems to speak to Daniel 9.27.

(and this is my blood) And He shall confirm (of the new testament) the covenant (which is shed for many) with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the (for the remission of sins. But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.)sacrifice and the oblation to cease.

Dan 9.26 (in the KJV) says "And after threescore and two weeks". Since it does not say "at the end of ..." then it may be that there is no deadline at the end of the 69th week. So when you look up the word, it can be legitimately translated "after(ward)" which would place the cutting off of the Messiah afterward into the 70th week.
The 70th week is the work of Christ, starting with His baptism. Only half of the mission is complete. The last half is still a future completion. The first coming was the Messiah. The second coming will be the Prince.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: christian1724
Upvote 0

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2017
3,485
1,045
Colorado
✟415,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Jesus arrived in the 69th week and when cutoff completed the 69 weeks.

Leaving the 70th week still unfulfilled.

False! Christ was cut off when He went to the Cross and at the same time, his blood confirmed a covenant. This is how the covenant was made strong. Just like the will of someone who died. When he dies, a will become a force. A covenant is confirmed for His Poeple.

Heb 9:14-17
(14) How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
(15) And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
(16) For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
(17) For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

The testament is a covenant. Christ has to die in order for the covenant to be confirmed or make strength for HIS PEOPLE! This is for the New Testament congregation! God was not talking about some peace treaty crap with national Israel some 2,000 years later with your so-called gap "theory" by your fantasy antichrist. Your premillennial doctrine of Daniel 9:24-27 is not supported by Scripture but by your own private interpretation. "Little Horn Prince", really?!
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
False! Christ was cut off when He went to the Cross and at the same time, his blood confirmed a covenant. This is how the covenant was made strong. Just like the will of someone who died. When he dies, a will become a force. A covenant is confirmed for His Poeple.

Heb 9:14-17
(14) How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
(15) And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
(16) For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
(17) For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

The testament is a covenant. Christ has to die in order for the covenant to be confirmed or make strength for HIS PEOPLE! This is for the New Testament congregation! God was not talking about some peace treaty crap with national Israel some 2,000 years later with your so-called gap "theory" by your fantasy antichrist. Your premillennial doctrine of Daniel 9:24-27 is not supported by Scripture but by your own private interpretation. "Little Horn Prince", really?!
Is the prince who shall come - a good person or a bad person? And what is his role for being mentioned in Daniel 9?
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Messiah was and is the Prince.

Jesus was and is the Messiah.

Ergo, Jesus was and is the Prince.
But Jesus was not a Roman. The prince who shall come will be of the Romans.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,448
10,675
Georgia
✟918,862.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Use common sense ask yourself this question, if this prophecy actually names the very year Jesus was born then why did not Jesus and the Apostles directly refer to it over and over as proof Jesus was the Messiah. They refer to dozens and dozens of other scriptures but just leave out the one prophecy that supposedly names the exact year of Jesus's birth. Please that is just plain nonsense. .

1. The 490 year timeline in Dan 9 begins in 457 B.C and the start of the 70th week (end of 69th) is 27 A.D.

2. which is the start of Christ's ministry - as "Messiah". Not the start of his earthly life as "baby".

3. The N.T. does speak of this -

Mark 1:
14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God,
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

The time line pointing to 27 A.D. and the start of Christ's ministry.

================================


Seventy Weeks and the Messiah

24 “Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city,
· to finish the transgression,
· to make an end of sin,
· to make atonement for iniquity,
· to bring in everlasting righteousness,
· to seal up vision and prophecy and
· to anoint the most holy place.

Vs 25

New International Version
“Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (457 B.C.) until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ (483 years) It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble.​

NASB
25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (457 B.C. ) until Messiah the Prince (anointed one) there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks (483 days = 483 years); it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress.​


Vs 26

New International Version
After the sixty-two ‘sevens,(after 27.A.D. ) ’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing. The people of the ruler (Caesar) who will come will destroy the city (Rome) and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.​

(after the 69 weeks ends. So 27 A.D. 483 years into the 490 year contiguous timeline)​

NASB
26 Then after the sixty-two weeks (after 27 A.D.) the Messiah (anointed one) will be cut off (crucified Christ) and have nothing, and the people of the prince (Rome) who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.​

27 And he (Messiah) will make a firm covenant (1 Cor 11:25) with the many for one week (7 years), but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering (Heb 10:4-12); and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate (pagan Rome, Caesar) , even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,448
10,675
Georgia
✟918,862.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
But Jesus was not a Roman. .

Messiah the prince - is literally the "anointed one" in Daniel 9 - not the "Roman one".

Only one of the princes in Dan 9 is called "the anointed one"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟807,167.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
But Jesus was not a Roman. The prince who shall come will be of the Romans.

Jesus was the prince who came. You are correct, He was not a Roman. You say that He will be of the Romans. But the text does not.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Jesus was the prince who came. You are correct, He was not a Roman. You say that He will be of the Romans. But the text does not.
"the people of the prince who shall come shall destroy the city and sanctuary"

Are you saying that because "Romans" is not directly spelled out in the text, as your reason for disagreement?

History is plain that is was the Romans who destroyed destroyed the city and sanctuary.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟807,167.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
"the people of the prince who shall come shall destroy the city and sanctuary"

Are you saying that because "Romans" is not directly spelled out in the text, as your reason for disagreement?

History is plain that is was the Romans who destroyed destroyed the city and sanctuary.

History is plain that it was both the Romans and Jews who destroyed the city and sanctuary in 70 AD.

Jesus Messiah the Prince was in Heaven in 70 AD.

In Heaven, He was neither Roman nor Jew.

But the Romans and Jews were His people for His purposes of accomplishing His judgment and destruction upon apostate Israel.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,023.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
History is plain that it was both the Romans and Jews who destroyed the city and sanctuary in 70 AD.
The person who becomes the Antichrist will be descended from the Julio-Claudians, Revelation 17:10. And will also be a Jew.

To become the Antichrist, the person has to be anointed the King of Israel - coming in his own name. Not coming in the name of the Lord.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0