Dad on Youtube

[PsychoSarah]

I did not trade some dread of science for a belief in God actually. I first realized God was right, and sought to find out why science was wrong in a sane and reasoned way

Wait, why can't they both be right?

 

[dad]

Yeah, really.

 

[dad]

Wait, why can't they both be right?

No!

 

[morningstar2651]

No!

Why not?

 

[PsychoSarah]

No!

That doesn't answer my question.

 

[dad]

Why not?

Real science of course fits with the bible. If you shoot a rocket to the moon, or build a bridge, that is all bonifide science. The problem is trying to use our spacetime and laws and form a picture of the past or future. That is not science, but a religion. That religion is opposed to the truth of God as revealed in the bible. Obviously.

 

[dad]

That doesn't answer my question.

See previous post.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Real science of course fits with the bible. If you shoot a rocket to the moon, or build a bridge, that is all bonifide science. The problem is trying to use our spacetime and laws and form a picture of the past or future. That is not science, but a religion. That religion is opposed to the truth of God as revealed in the bible. Obviously.

Obviously it isn't obvious, because if it were it wouldn't be questioned so much. Also, science doesn't become a religion just because the evidence it finds doesn't seem to work in the context of your religion.

 

[dad]

Obviously it isn't obvious, because if it were it wouldn't be questioned so much.

What would not be questioned?

Also, science doesn't become a religion just because the evidence it finds doesn't seem to work in the context of your religion.

It became a belief system when it rested on beliefs. A same state past is a belief that could not and was not proven. Period.

 

[biggles53]

Real science of course fits with the bible. If you shoot a rocket to the moon, or build a bridge, that is all bonifide science. The problem is trying to use our spacetime and laws and form a picture of the past or future. That is not science, but a religion. That religion is opposed to the truth of God as revealed in the bible. Obviously.

Guess what....science also contravenes much of what is literally written in the Qu'ran, the Greek myths, the Egyptian myths, the Aboriginal Dreamtime, etc, etc......

So what....? Your brand of myth has no greater claim to 'Tha Truth' than any of those others.....and just as much of a problem as they have in being able to back up its claims.....

 

[dad]

Guess what....science also contravenes much of what is literally written in the Qu'ran, the Greek myths, the Egyptian myths, the Aboriginal Dreamtime, etc, etc......

Who cares what the sick religion falsely called science also opposes besides the truth!? Guess what, not me!

So what....? Your brand of myth has no greater claim to 'Tha Truth' than any of those others.....and just as much of a problem as they have in being able to back up its claims.....

You need authority to call a belief that is tried and proven and tested and known a myth. Once we see that you have no science, all opinions are relegated to near insignificance.

 

[biggles53]

What would not be questioned?



It became a belief system when it rested on beliefs. A same state past is a belief that could not and was not proven. Period.

How many times does something have to be repeated before it penetrates some skulls...!?

It is NOT a belief, it is an OBSERVATION....we observe that there is a certain set of physical properties which govern the existence and operation of our universe. YOU AND YOU ALONE claim that a different set of properties used to exist at some time in the past. It is therefore up to YOU to show evidence for this change in the status quo.

At this point you have shown ZERO evidence for such a claim....instead, you declare it to be so on the ridiculous basis that no-one has shown that it couldn't.....that's not how it works bud......YOU make the claim, YOU provide the evidence...!

 

[PsychoSarah]

Who cares what the sick religion falsely called science also opposes besides the truth!? Guess what, not me!
You need authority to call a belief that is tried and proven and tested and known a myth. Once we see that you have no science, all opinions are relegated to near insignificance.

Parts of the bible have been proven to be myth for over 100 years.

 

[biggles53]

Who cares what the sick religion falsely called science also opposes besides the truth!? Guess what, not me!
You need authority to call a belief that is tried and proven and tested and known a myth. Once we see that you have no science, all opinions are relegated to near insignificance.

Just one thing missing.....your belief has NOT been tried and proven....!

News flash.......you preferring one myth over others does NOT make your choice any more likely to be accurate...!

 

[dad]

How many times does something have to be repeated before it penetrates some skulls...!?

The bible was posted long ago. You getting it?

It is NOT a belief, it is an OBSERVATION....we observe that there is a certain set of physical properties which govern the existence and operation of our universe.

Not true! Time is not known to exist where the stars are. You observe IN our spacetime, and under our laws.

YOU AND YOU ALONE claim that a different set of properties used to exist at some time in the past. It is therefore up to YOU to show evidence for this change in the status quo.

Flattery will get you nowhere. The bible does describe a nature that is not like this one, don't blame me.

At this point you have shown ZERO evidence for such a claim..

Science has no evidence either way. Face it. That is why you show none. Ever. Amen.

..instead, you declare it to be so on the ridiculous basis that no-one has shown that it couldn't....

No one can show what was not there! Science can't show this fundamental basis for all it's claims....the present state in the past or future. Period. Really.

.that's not how it works bud......YOU make the claim, YOU provide the evidence...!

Science made claims and it must do more than rest on beliefs! God made claims, and showed He was right in ways He chose, and that does not include so called science. Get it Bud?

 

[dad]

Parts of the bible have been proven to be myth for over 100 years.

Not in the real world. Come on now.

 

[morningstar2651]

Not in the real world. Come on now.

Afraid so dad. Don't fret; just because something is a myth doesn't make it a lie.

 

[dad]

Afraid so dad. Don't fret; just because something is a myth doesn't make it a lie.

Afraid so kid. The definition of myth starts with this

": an idea or story that is believed by many people but that is not true"


Myth - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Even in the other meaning.."

: a story that was told in an ancient culture to explain a practice, belief, or natural occurrence"


--the bible is not a myth! It was not made up to explain anything. God gave it.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Afraid so kid. The definition of myth starts with this

": an idea or story that is believed by many people but that is not true"


Myth - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Even in the other meaning.."

: a story that was told in an ancient culture to explain a practice, belief, or natural occurrence"


--the bible is not a myth! It was not made up to explain anything. God gave it.

I'm sorry dad, but seriously some of these stories have been disproven, for a very long time. Whether or not you can accept that doesn't change the reality.

 

[dad]

I'm sorry dad, but seriously some of these stories have been disproven, for a very long time. Whether or not you can accept that doesn't change the reality.

Sorry you were misled. Never seen one story that wasn't true yet.